Alright derek spong is really good and props to him to finishing 2nd at the US open, especially at 14 years old. But all of his 10's look the same. They weren't even close to jacob webster's 7. Jacob webster should have advanced instead of him.
But my question is why all of his non-stylie 10's were 'better' than the steeziest 7's I've seen. Why do judges keep ranking 10's better if they are uglier? I know this has been posted a million times, but damn, I'm sick of this.
I don't deny there are bad things in the US right now, hell, 51% of the country to be exact. But god damnit, our country being fat is NOT a problem. I do't give a shit how fat people are. hell, fat kids are harder to kidnap, that means our country is safer.