Laurent."However the over whelming agreement between economists which don't pose any sort of agenda is that immigrants and refugees are good for the economy in the long run."
That's just plain BS, when the current situation over the past 100 years in the Netherlands has shown it hasn't. OECD is also not free of any bias, and that research from the CPB is essentially the Dutch government presenting the actual numbers. It is a part of the Ministry of Economic Affairs (Netherlands) and it delivers economic analysis and forecasts. It is operating independently. This means it does have a stable income but also does not have to follow the ministry.
No guesswork, no estimations, but the raw actual data proves that immigrants/refugees over here do not thrive.
All you do is say my references are shit but yours are the golden goose. That's no argumentation.
Did you miss the part where it;s 19 out of 20 European countries will benefit from refugees? Guess what that one country that won't benefit from refugees??? Boom you guessed it netherlands!!!!
But for the remaining European countries they will benefit from the refugees. I fail how you can't get this.
And no, your sources are shit because frontex is pretty anti immigration, and the other is shit because it didn't reference any of articles. Surely you learnt how to see if a source is reliable in your first year of uni...
Also, you claim that the majority of them are economic migrants. Well a study done by ODI found that if countries cut welfare that would not stop
refugees.