Member of the Month

JalmarKalmar
April, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Faction Prodigy or On3p Jeronimos—Help me! (+k)

profile picture
McLS
Posts: 1980 - Karma: 6,446
I was almost sure about the Jeronimos (2013 model) and then here I am again, stuck between those two great skis...

What I'm looking for:

-All mountain = mainly park/small pow but still perform ok in deep pow
-Buttery --> probably one of the determining factor, which one is more buttery out of the two?
-Carve nicely on groomers (not too jittery)



*I know that the Prodigys are lighter, but the Jeronimos will probably last me longer (on3p is famous for durability).

*The prodigy have 178, whereas Jeronimos are 176 (or 181), since I'm 5,8, 178 would be better, but not really gonna make a big difference.

*Jeronimos are 101 underfoot against 98 for Prodigys, I think 101 is better, although no big difference either

Price is very similar on both, graphics are equally cool.

I can't choose!!! Anybody rode one or the other, feedback would help me a lot!
Nov 1 2013 11:39AM
12 0
profile picture
TimRiley
Posts: 1873 - Karma: 1,327
12/13 Jmos are a great ski. More of a medium-stiff flex though. No problems with chatter on groomers. I wouldn't describe them as buttery, but you can still butter with them pretty easily. I have no experience with Prodigys to compare the two.
Nov 1 2013 11:51AM
2 0
profile picture
MLJ
Posts: 1849 - Karma: 3,649
you gotta decide between buttery and stable, because they are at the opposite ends of the stiffness scale. How buttery do you want vs how fast do you like to go? also really floppy skis dont float too well.

I havent ridden either though so I cant say which is better for you of them
Nov 1 2013 11:57AM
1 0
profile picture
McLS
Posts: 1980 - Karma: 6,446
its not actually all down to stiffness/floppyness...an early rise helps being buttery for example. Both jeronimos and prodigy are buttery (well compared to Al dente, they're not, but still quite flexible). Being too buttery won't mean you can't bomb down the mountain, just you won't be able to carve at all.
Nov 1 2013 12:13PM
1 0
profile picture
penguiin
Posts: 1444 - Karma: 561
I own jeronimos and love them.

Like the guy said above me, they aren't really "buttery" but you can't have buttery, no chatter, and good in pow.

Go with the jmos man, great ski, last a long time, perfect all mountain ski.
Nov 1 2013 12:57PM
2 0
profile picture
McLS
Posts: 1980 - Karma: 6,446
arrrh Hard choice is hard, in my old ski choosing thread everyone was saying that jmos were the best, i guess not many people have actually skied the Prodigys....Well ill make sure to post feedback whatever ski i get!

oh n +k to you guys, hope it doesn't take of 5000 instead of giving you like 100...
Nov 1 2013 1:01PM
1 0
profile picture
JIB_WALRUS
Posts: 671 - Karma: 130
Softness doesn't necessarily mean its a good butter ski I rode 178 Line anthems(super soft) they buttered alright but the flex consistency wasn't there. I upgraded to the fr a stiffer ski than the anthem, due to the bamboo the flex is much more consistent and easier to control this makes butters effortless. The jmo would be a great choice but I haven't ridden the prodigies.
Nov 2 2013 1:50PM
1 0
profile picture
Ducky.
Posts: 5811 - Karma: 1,420
What he said
Nov 2 2013 8:49PM
1 0
profile picture
McLS
Posts: 1980 - Karma: 6,446
Thanks for the feedback, but i think i'll go with the prodigy now, i really want a more buttery ski to jib around with.
Nov 3 2013 7:13AM
1 0
All times are Eastern (-4)