Red Bull Unrailistic | LIVE Broadcast

Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Punx vs filthy riches or prestors

profile picture
M.M
Posts: 1696 - Karma: 4,490
I'm 16, 5'7'' 140 and expecting to grow more. these skis will be for park and only park since i already have a all mountain/ pow ski. i ski park in Edmonton Alberta and it snows alot but when its -30c for a week and it doesn't snow it can get a little icy but im not worried about that to much. im about 50/50 rails to jumps and i spin jumps as big as my local places have, last years was 60 feet and i was spinning it but thats on the bigger end of jumps 40 feet is about the average size so they need to be pretty solid landing jumps but be really durable for the rails and thats why i want on3p because i have first hand experience of how durable they are. its mainly a toss up between the punx and filthy riches, and maybe prestors but i feel like they would be to stiff.

punx-
positves: good flex, good on rails, some rocker, lightweight, good size underfoot.
negatives: not durable

filthy riches-
positves: rocker, good on rails, really fun, bomb proof.
negatives: possibly to soft? possibly heavy?

prestors-
positves: bombproof, good size underfoot,
negatives: possibly to stiff?

can someone help me decide and are filthy riches to soft for jumps or are they just right?

Aug 31 2013 10:16PM
6 6
profile picture
M.M
Posts: 1696 - Karma: 4,490
bamp
Aug 31 2013 11:43PM
0 0
profile picture
TRAP_CHEF
Posts: 1172 - Karma: 279
If i were you id probably rule out the prestors there gunna be too stiff for you your already pretty light and you wouldnt need a ski that stiff unless you were hittin mostly jumps the filthys are a ton of fun though and i would definitely recommend them but the punx sounds like a great ski too honestly if you pick one of those two you wont look back
Aug 31 2013 11:47PM
0 0
profile picture
M.M
Posts: 1696 - Karma: 4,490
the only things im worried about is punx getting beat to shit and fr being to soft? help
Sep 1 2013 12:27AM
0 0
profile picture
SPUTnik.
Posts: 1487 - Karma: 2,555
Punx are a waste of money, my brothers got delaminated in the first two weeks
Sep 1 2013 11:56AM
0 0
profile picture
SPUTnik.
Posts: 1487 - Karma: 2,555
Punx are a waste of money, my brothers got delaminated in the first two weeks of use
Sep 1 2013 11:56AM
0 0
profile picture
tomPietrowski
Posts: 7099 - Karma: 17,043
^ well that's unlucky but he will get them replaced by warranty if its a delam. They are a great ski though and honestly for the op sound the best option especially with the new ones being a bit stiffer. I have had punx and the durability is on par with any other park ski so don't worry about trashing them.
Sep 1 2013 12:41PM
2 0
profile picture
M.M
Posts: 1696 - Karma: 4,490
anyone know if the flex of the two is similar underfoot of punx and fr's
Sep 1 2013 1:01PM
0 0
profile picture
EthanScott23
Posts: 203 - Karma: 89
friend of mine said the filthy riches have a shitty turning radius
Sep 17 2013 6:26PM
1 2
profile picture
SkiTheYeast
Posts: 2310 - Karma: 392
Filthy Riches are hands down my favorite ski ive ever been on. They are light, poppy, DURABLE, and the rocker is so sick it allows the ski to be stiff but still really easy to butter and press.
Sep 17 2013 7:01PM
0 0
profile picture
Newschool_Pope
Posts: 2473 - Karma: 267
going into the second season with the 12/13 punx. hit some urban, lots of summer glacier skiing and indoors. i really beat them on rail with high impacts and the edges only have a few cracks. no edges pulling out, only an 1x1 inch part of topsheet was chipped off of the tail. the wood shows a little now but i put some epoxy on and theyre good to go. going to buy another pair when this one dies.
Sep 18 2013 8:01PM
0 0
profile picture
Cotter
Posts: 2546 - Karma: 850
He said they were for park soley. I don't think I have ever even bothered looking at turning radius for park skis because it doesn't matter all that much (for a park ski).
Sep 19 2013 11:20PM
0 0
profile picture
will_powder
Posts: 3194 - Karma: 5,445
60 footers in edmonton...yeah right haha.
Sep 20 2013 2:55AM
0 0
profile picture
tomPietrowski
Posts: 7099 - Karma: 17,043
Of course it matters if your carving off a lip it's the turn radius that dictates how they will carve. It's less inportant then all mtn but certainly is a big factor in ski choice still.
Sep 20 2013 4:46AM
0 0
profile picture
Balto
Posts: 25985 - Karma: 4,398
Your friend is probably a shitty skier. As an ex FIS level racer and someone who has been on BS's and FR's for years, i can safely say they make a turn better then ANY OTHER SYMMETRICAL SKI ON THE MARKET. They have an infinite turn radius, so the more you put into them the harder they can turn. They adapt perfectly to pretty much any ski style, from really tight turns around rails or trees, to big fast SG turns ripping down a groomer or into a jump. I've hit jumps 70ft+ on FR's and never once had any stability issues.
Sep 20 2013 11:45AM
1 0
profile picture
Jakey.
Posts: 329 - Karma: 3,000
https://vimeo.com/73670465
Sep 20 2013 3:21PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)