It looks like you are using an ad blocker. That's okay. Who doesn't? But without advertising revenue, we can't keep making this site awesome. Click the link below for instructions on disabling adblock.
Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
Yeah I wouldn't call it a dub misty. Whenever one of my friends does a misty 5 to back flip we always called it a pimp flip. Not sure why but we've just always called them that. But regardless of the name that was dope
1. It's a Windells' video meaning it's an ADVERTISEMENT. They don't give a shit if it's a true dub cork as much as the X-Games would.
2. In that second video, if you didn't read my fucking post specifically addressing that not every second rotation is perfectly set as if you're going off a jump, he starts that second rotation while SIDEWAYS, so if you consider that a lincoln then you're just further proving my point.
By the way, that's all irrelevant to proving that a misty 450 to backflip OFF A RAIL should be considered a double misty, even though only one misty is actually tossed.
You n00bz are so pathetic. I'm dying to see you flood this thread with your ignorance... go on.
you aren't proving anything? and I said that the second rotation in the second video is more of a switch frontflip. I don't see how it was irrelevant, in the first video there was only one cork rotation, still a dub cork, and in the second there was only one switch rodeo, still a switch dub rodeo. Sure Pc's trick didn't reach the expectations of skiierman, which of course all skiers should reach or else they are terrible and gay, but I would still let other people call it a dub misty, and leave them alone.
Are you fucking retarded? Since when are backflips landed switch? Even the noobiest of noobs know that backflips are landed forwards. It's a misty 450 to switch backflip. Getting all high and mighty on others and then getting your own claim ass backwards...priceless.
For example, let's take a look at Tom Wallisch's sw dub cork 10 trick tip (Which looks like a sw dub rodeo 10 for me, but if the master says it's a dub cork then it's a dub cork. Whatever, it's irrelevant in this case)
If you look at his dub, the first rotation is a sw rodeo 5 (or a sw cork 5 since it's a sw dub CORK. Again, this is irrelevant).
After the first rotation comes the second one. Now, according to some of you guyzzzzzzzzzzzzz the second rotation should be a sw (or forward, I haven't yet fully figured out your theory) cork/rodeo 5 since the first one was a sw cork/rodeo 5 and the name of the dub is sw dub cork/rodeo 10.
Well, is it a rodeo/cork 5? No, it's not. It is an undeflip. Tom even recommends to learn really flippy sw rodeo 5 and underflips before trying the dub.
So this leaves us some options:
1) I am wrong, the second flip is indeed a sw cork/rodeo. If this is the case, I apologize. Hate me all you want. Your theory still applies to this trick.
2) Your theory doesn't apply to sw doubles, which would be extremely stupid IMO.
3) I am right. The second rotation is an underflip. According to your "theory", this would mean that Tom Wallisch, the Newschoolers' loved one, calls this double with a wrong name (It should be something like sw rodeo/cork 5 to underflip) or your theory is bullshit.
I'm leaning towards the 3rd option, but I would like to hear your guyzzzzzzzzzz opinion too. And btw, this post is as relevant to this thread as "OMG dat aint no dub misty its a misty to backflip you noobz" - posts.
To all those guys saying gus' looked better, watch both videos again and look at the difference between the rails, sure gus' looked a bit nicer, but fosse's was crazy because the momentum was completely against him.
Also, so much hate for such a sick trick, grow the fuck up.
Im really sorry that you hate this trick so much, Skiierman. But why do you really care? Would be glad if you could show me how to do this in a proper way. But thanks for all the nice comments, really stoked that some of you liked it!
First off, I can't do that trick and it's dope that you can. Props, it's what, the 2nd double ever done off a rail? So big ups on that for pushing the sport.
But you did kinda miss the boot grab. It's important cause it's what separates us from the aerials. Hucking for the sake of hucking isn't what I want to see... put some style in there PC, I know you got it in you.
What does that even mean- if they're already going switch then like I said, it's a switch backflip - not a backflip, like you erroneously claimed.
So either you're just agreeing with me that you don't know the difference between really simple tricks like a regular backflip and a switch backflip, or you do know the difference but you're not smart enough to actually type it out correctly. Even though you're the one on the thread being a pedantic dick about the mechanics of a much more complicated trick like a double misty.
And you reiterating your stupidity in caps locks helps by....wait, how does that help?
My point remains - you're retarded. Digging yourself further into a hole doesn't help.
PS. Your grammar is so fucking terrible that your sentence is pretty much incomprehensible. Which kind of adds weight to my accusation that you're a fucking retard.
Thanks. I know that the grab is not there, but as you probobly can see, it's not the biggest launch rail so It was really hard to get a dub flip there. In the future I will try to get a nice grab On that one. Btw, I've nevet seen an ariels dude do tricks from a rail.
I don't care about the grab - it was sick and you were rightly stoked on just landing such a difficult trick. A grab will come with time, just like any trick someone's just learned. How many kids grab their first three?
NS is just full bitter little loser kids these days who like to shoot their mouths off because they can't achieve anything themselves. First Lolo getting hate and then you, unbelievable.
Maybe you're too busy looking like a flailing idiot while skiing but I don't hate the trick and have never said I hated it or you... all I said was that it was not a double misty... like you jackasses seem to think it was.
Your logic and reading comprehension is about as impressive as the 13-year-olds on this POS site.
I'm all about the quantity, you fucking shit. I don't care about how much quality caring and being a fucking pussy is included in my posts.
If you want to suck cock in public, do it in the bushes at the park. The forums is no place for that because after all, there could be kids watching! OMG
Do you really want your kids to catch the gay? I don't think so.
I was talking about skiing (specifically you being so much of a noob you can't tell the difference between a backflip and a switch backflip) and you're changing the subject to sucking cock. Trying to shift the conversation on to a subject you're more comfortable with?
I was going to photoshop your face on but then I realised I'd be wasting my time - you and Bad Luck Brian look fucking identical. Were you separated at birth?
Coming from a kid who thinks it really was a dub misty and decides to try to save himself from embarrassment by nit-picking between a backie and switch backie when there's zero difference between the two aside from the direction you're heading down the hill... MAN YOU GOT ME GOOD!
I have never once claimed it was a double misty. Read the fucking thread again - I called it a misty 450 to swtitch backflip.
I just corrected you when you were wrong because you were being a douchebag nit picking about it. And if you're going to nitpick about shit like that then you better not get confused about one of the easiest tricks of all time - it makes you look like a fucking noob, noob.
"There's zero difference between the two except for this major difference between the two...". Logical.
Awww, wow I care so much about remember which one of you stupid shit heads say what... like I care so much that I re-read every post that you made JUST to be sure that when I respond to you, I know exactly what you posted earlier! You're all the same stupid children to me, much like how all Asains look identical.
And not knowing what you specifically posted invalidates everything I've said before... makes sense... logical.
