Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Coreupt or fatypus

profile picture
east.coast.skier
Posts: 47 - Karma: 21
I'm looking for new skis and i like the corrupt yards and the fatypus g butters. I've never heard anything about how good either of these companies are and just wanted some input. just like weight, flex, durability, and stuff like that
Dec 13 2011 4:51PM
0 0
profile picture
Cab3
Posts: 767 - Karma: 50

Fatypus if you have the money to blow.

Dec 13 2011 6:11PM
0 0
profile picture
east.coast.skier
Posts: 47 - Karma: 21
bump
Dec 13 2011 9:41PM
0 0
profile picture
east.coast.skier
Posts: 47 - Karma: 21
bump
Dec 14 2011 7:39PM
0 0
profile picture
Woodhouse
Posts: 390 - Karma: 160
This.
Dec 14 2011 7:41PM
0 0
profile picture
DERS.
Posts: 6299 - Karma: 1,293
honestly neither make a very good product. coreupt is shit quality and fatypus will feel like you have 2x4's (such a damp/not fun/overall crappy ski)

so my advice would be to look elsewhere....
Dec 14 2011 8:15PM
0 0
profile picture
DUKES
Posts: 5149 - Karma: 686
totally wrong
Dec 14 2011 8:30PM
0 0
profile picture
east.coast.skier
Posts: 47 - Karma: 21
wrong about the coreupt or the fatypus? and which one is better quality and a better overall ski
Dec 14 2011 9:49PM
0 0
profile picture
.Duncan.
Posts: 1375 - Karma: 459
fatypus, btw are you decided on these two or would you be open to other options?

Dec 14 2011 9:50PM
0 0
profile picture
east.coast.skier
Posts: 47 - Karma: 21
and i have suspects now, i love them but i was looking for a softer ski. i still might just go with the '12 suspects unless coreupt or fatypus makes a good ski
Dec 14 2011 9:51PM
0 0
profile picture
KillaSteeze
Posts: 3329 - Karma: 351
im with this guy
Dec 14 2011 10:09PM
0 0
profile picture
DUKES
Posts: 5149 - Karma: 686
the g-butters are really durable and really playful. They are a bit $ since they are a small ski company but they are quite worth it. yards are the same durable and playful. They are cheaper since they are only available online. The yards will be the stiffer of the two but not too much. Personally i would purchase the g-butters since they are a really great company and they do not manufacture in china like coreupt. Stimulate the economy and your joy in the park bro
Dec 14 2011 10:27PM
0 0
profile picture
east.coast.skier
Posts: 47 - Karma: 21
very helpful thats exactly what i was looking for thanks man. definitely getting that +k
Dec 14 2011 11:00PM
0 0
profile picture
DERS.
Posts: 6299 - Karma: 1,293
wrong about what?

coreupt makes shiity quality skis. that is a fact.

and the fatypus skis are very damp (in my opinion) and not very well made either.

but hey its not like i work in a shop or anything and would know anything about a skis durability and quality.....
Dec 15 2011 10:55AM
0 0
profile picture
Chilly.
Posts: 930 - Karma: 24
You are wrong and obviously basing you opinion about fatypus on nothing...they are made in the same factory as Icelantic skis and both a extremely high quality and bombproof. Ive actually ridden the skis and you have no idea what your talking about.
Dec 15 2011 2:10PM
0 0
profile picture
DERS.
Posts: 6299 - Karma: 1,293
ive ridden fatypus skis aswell. and they are no fun and felt like i had wooden 2x4's under my foot. that is my opinion (not something i can be wrong about). and ive seen at least 3 or 4 pairs of fatypus's that have needed extensive repairs (delams, edges falling out, and diecut issues in the base) beyond your typical wear and tear in just one season. therefore i'm advising the kid not to purchase based on my experience with the ski. i have quite a good idea what im talking about sir. so please hop off your high horse and let me voice my opinion on the brand.
Dec 15 2011 3:17PM
0 0
profile picture
DUKES
Posts: 5149 - Karma: 686
maybe you lack character
Dec 15 2011 3:40PM
0 0
profile picture
wrichmond
Posts: 562 - Karma: 369
Can't speak for the G-Butters but I ride the D-Senders and I-Rocks, which are both beyond kickass.
They charge like crazy, are stable and dependable when necessary and playful to boot. Very bomber bases as well, and incredibly light. I recommend the brand.
Dec 15 2011 5:29PM
0 0
profile picture
Chilly.
Posts: 930 - Karma: 24
Well if you suck at skiing then yea they might feel like a piece of wood lol. Oh yea you've seen at least 3 or 4 that were in serious need of repair? That's complete bullshit but it's the Internet so I guess you can lie about stuff like that...
Dec 15 2011 7:10PM
0 0
profile picture
maxwell666
Posts: 554 - Karma: 20
First of all damp is not bad, people pay upwards of a grand for kastle skis which apparently are as damp as can be. If you ever leave the park you would notice that flappy bouncy skis that don't absorb vibration aren't very good in choppy or hard pack snow, that's why people buy damp skis.

Secondly, dampness isn't an opinion and you can definitely be wrong about it.

Lastly, everyone else disagrees anyways, so hop off your high horse and give it a rest.
Dec 15 2011 7:15PM
0 0
profile picture
infuser
Posts: 1220 - Karma: 241
I love my 2010/2011 candide yards. They're really light and playful. Plus, you can get them for $199 on skis.com which doesn't hurt
Dec 15 2011 7:50PM
0 0
profile picture
DERS.
Posts: 6299 - Karma: 1,293
ahh classic internets argument. your right i must suck at skiing, and clearly lack character; you got it!!!

yes im aware damp is desired by some, but for a sight like newschoolers most kids want something buttery and soft. though i might clarify ive never ridden the g butters but ive tried the d sender and one other i believe. not a fun ski, in my opinion.

and finally im not making anything up. the shop i work at and a few others i know of are no longer carying fatypus skis because they have not sold very well (and because they are not very well made, but no one seems to believe me on that).


go ahead and criticize away on this post!!! i cant wait to respond.

Dec 16 2011 2:15AM
0 0
profile picture
crawley
Posts: 605 - Karma: 729
ha, you sound like the bitch ass kids in Michigan when they try to rip a pair of stiff boards.

The skis were obviously to stiff for you. Keep working on it, the more aggressive you get the less you will get that 2x4 feeling on a pair of skis, I remember it from when I was 12 and probably skied like you do today. Practice makes perfect and you'll get there and we won't have to hear you bitch about 2x4s on the boards anymore. I would suggest a really soft ski like an old K2 fujative or press for you based on your ability right now.

Both companies make legit skis no doubt, Coreupt has been producing some of the best skis around since they moved to the China factory, just as good as Armada from my experience, stiff beefy skis with vertical sidewalls.
Dec 16 2011 9:11AM
0 0
profile picture
DERS.
Posts: 6299 - Karma: 1,293
yep you got it! i'm a 12 yr old park rat...

except that it seems you're the one from michigan. believe me i can "handle" any ski i just prefer a softer-jibbier ski. its pretentious fucks like you who ruin the skiing community. just because i have a preference for a softer ski doesnt mean i cant ski. i grew up skiing telluride all my life. there are some stiffer skis that don't feel like 2x4's that i have enjoyed (suspects, though they have issues of their own, icelantic shaman's, and my roommates black diamond megawatts). so for you to say i'm a 12 yr old is just so ignorant.

but hey im willing to forgive. i just got to telluride and will be shredin here and silverton for the next month. but enjoy your 350ft vertical ski hill suckaa..
Dec 16 2011 9:58AM
0 0
profile picture
crawley
Posts: 605 - Karma: 729
Click for larger image

pretty jealous right now actually, hope you guys get some snow I'll get out there next Saturday.
Dec 16 2011 10:12AM
0 0
profile picture
iSmokeweed
Posts: 4793 - Karma: 1,370
agreed.
Dec 16 2011 11:08AM
0 0
profile picture
Chilly.
Posts: 930 - Karma: 24
The only one who is ignorant in this thread is you and every time you post you make it worse. Your "opinion" is not better than that of most the people in this thread disagreeing with you. Give it a fucking rest already you might not be 12 but you act like it.
Dec 16 2011 11:51AM
0 0
profile picture
.nasty
Posts: 10581 - Karma: 11,092
fatypus = damp as fuck old man skis.

coreupt = shitty as fuck skis. period.
Dec 16 2011 11:52AM
0 0
profile picture
crawley
Posts: 605 - Karma: 729


First Run With LJ and Friends from Evan Heath Visual on Vimeo.



A lot of shit talking in this thread with very little backup. Can't go wrong but the Coreupt Permins/BTDs IMO are as well built and fun as they come for a deep day ski.
Dec 16 2011 12:29PM
0 0
profile picture
GorillaSteez03
Posts: 344 - Karma: 65
Get the Butters man....they are my favorite park ski and I will most certainly be getting another pair myself after my current pair gets retired.  I honestly have had no problem with durability, and I have been riding these pretty hard for about a season now, & I ski mostly rails, so these are in heavy contact with metal atleast 5 times a week.  No  delams, no base problems, just average degradation on my edges from rail skiing.  I personally love the flex pattern on these, they are stiff enough to hold up really well on jumps & high speeds, but they definitely have a butter zone and can be pretty playful and snappy when you want them to be.  Super crisp ollies too....and feather light.  I have had a lot of experience with this ski, and in my opinion, you can't go wrong.
Dec 16 2011 4:39PM
0 0
profile picture
DaysToCome
Posts: 1601 - Karma: 86
wait your trying to tell him he shouldnt buy the the g-butters because the d-sender was damp and not very playful? you realize that the d-sender is pretty much a big mountain/comp ski right? thats no where close to what a park ski is going to feel like. Ive heard good things about fatypus, theyre made in the never summer factory in denver and alot of the skis and boards coming out of there have pretty good reputations for being durable. id say support them.
Dec 17 2011 2:13AM
0 0
profile picture
PUFFY
Posts: 160 - Karma: 64
This. I've ridden a pair of candide pows for the past 2 seasons and so far they've held up well
Dec 17 2011 4:30AM
0 0
profile picture
I_Am_Mod
Posts: 13214 - Karma: 3,753
just throwing it in here that i have coreupt TJ schillers and from what i've seen/experienced with this ski, i'd buy coreupt in a heartbeat!
so cheap for so much quality !

i got mine for 99$, brand new :)
Dec 17 2011 5:46AM
0 0
profile picture
.nasty
Posts: 10581 - Karma: 11,092
keep believing that a 99 dollar ski is going to last... really. lol
Dec 20 2011 10:51AM
0 0
profile picture
DUKES
Posts: 5149 - Karma: 686
well they do last sooooooooooooooo
Dec 20 2011 11:09AM
0 0
profile picture
AviadIL
Posts: 245 - Karma: 30
haven't skied fatypus but i've skied yards for a couple of days last season and the felt pretty good..
they were a bit too stiff for me but i had rossi scratch wich are like wet noodles.. swing weight was more than fine and they definately felt solid on landings..
Dec 20 2011 12:18PM
0 0
profile picture
I_Am_Mod
Posts: 13214 - Karma: 3,753
so you think expensive skis are better skis?

even if they're less durable than a regular park ski (which i highly doubt), i can go through 3 pairs for the same money....
Dec 20 2011 1:29PM
0 0
profile picture
I_Am_Mod
Posts: 13214 - Karma: 3,753
also, just for reference, coreupt had a bad reputation concerning durability back when they were rebranding dynastars up until 2009 (i think)
after that they shifted their production line to china so they can produce skis for near to nothing and strange enough the quality of the skis has improved dramatically....
Dec 20 2011 1:34PM
0 0
profile picture
ankhou
Posts: 505 - Karma: 238
I love my TJ Pros. Solid ski, really fun flex. I don't hit rails with them though, so YMMV. I haven't noticed any obvious issues with Coreupt's construction though.
Dec 20 2011 1:50PM
0 0
profile picture
YoUnGinAYo
Posts: 307 - Karma: 226
Get the Fatypus L-Toro.  Fucking sick Bro!
Dec 20 2011 2:01PM
0 0
profile picture
I_Am_Mod
Posts: 13214 - Karma: 3,753
^^didnt you win their topsheet design contest? cause that was a tight looking ski!
although i do enjoy mine with the previous topsheets with the little ghosts on them :)
Dec 20 2011 2:04PM
0 0
profile picture
ankhou
Posts: 505 - Karma: 238
I did, yeah. Thanks! I really dug the first topsheet on the TJ Pro when they were still being produced in the Dynastar moulds - the teal and purple one.
Dec 20 2011 3:36PM
0 0
profile picture
infuser
Posts: 1220 - Karma: 241
really? I could just be crazy but I feel like my Candide Yards are really soft
Dec 20 2011 4:25PM
0 0
profile picture
AviadIL
Posts: 245 - Karma: 30
as i said- i've skied them for just a few days and the only freestyle ski i've ridden before is a rossi scratch, wich is way softer...
Dec 21 2011 10:33AM
0 0
profile picture
steve0
Posts: 1120 - Karma: 1,048
You've ridden these? I'm picking up a pair for this season. I had orignally settled on the Moment PB&J's since they were $125 cheaper, but they sold out in my size. I'm pretty stoked on these now though, I think I'll like them better than the moments.
Dec 21 2011 10:57AM
0 0
profile picture
ChocolateMilk.
Posts: 1129 - Karma: 220
He didn't say his opinion was better.
And you didn't disagree with him you said his opinion was wrong.
Calm down....
Dec 21 2011 2:33PM
0 0
profile picture
YoUnGinAYo
Posts: 307 - Karma: 226
I have only seen them in shop.  they are such a perfect dimension ski.  they are light, and they have a fairly soft flex.  and plus AD rides them when he is cruisin the mountain so you cant go wrong there
Dec 23 2011 10:04PM
0 0
profile picture
Chilly.
Posts: 930 - Karma: 24
If you actually read his first post you would realize he was calling coreupts "shit quality" and that fatypus skis feel like planks of wood as if both were a proven fact. It was in no way stated like an opinion. I having ridden skis from both companies defended them. Also almost everyone in the thread disagreed with him as well.

So Im sorry I offended you.
Dec 23 2011 11:51PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)