Hey i played the second one, and it was sick. I havent played the first one. Now the third is coming out though and i was wondering if you guys think i should play the first one, like is it one big story or what?
Trolling attempt or not, might as well answer this properly.
AC1 is a good game for the story, but AC2 improved on nearly every flaw it had, such as absolutely horrifyingly repetitive missions. If I were you I would read the Wikipedia plot synopsis without having to trudge through the god-awful and tedious parts of the game. Apparently the cops in Jerusalem were always pretty strict with speed limits, as if you dare to even THINK about sprinting slightly on a horse in the vicinity, they'll burn you like hot glue poured down your urethra.
Does Crichton smoke? Does a bear shit in the woods? -Rex
"What's the point in being an outlaw if you've got responsibilities?"
"Keep this in mind kids, poop is your friend, but can also be your worst enemy." -Alpentalik
AC1 is sweet but once you've done a mission in each of the cities the game gets incredibly boring and repetitive. you're in the same cities climbing basically the same viewpoints, saving the same citizens, pickpocketing from the same people, and killing the same people like 13 times