Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
Vanular with faction skis
Posts: 1123
-
Karma: 1,568
Posts: 4276
-
Karma: 1,047
good, I tought I was the only one who tought it didn't make sens
Posts: 11498
-
Karma: 327
its unfortunate for a lot of people that all they want to do is hate instead of actually trying the skis out because i bet that 90% of the haters would fall in love with the skis after one day on them.
Posts: 984
-
Karma: 250
i don't understand . . . you're reppin' 9thward, and you said it was "pretty gay" of vanular to leave. but then you blame your sponsor--9thward----for your lack of production. why should anyone--including you--stay with a sponsor if they don't invest in your exposure? seems like you and your bro stuck with 9 because you got to be on the "pro" team and have "pro" models. obviously there are gonna be a trade-offs for getting those perks before you deserve it.
Posts: 878
-
Karma: 456
Posts: 984
-
Karma: 250
... says the dude who can't spell you're.
Posts: 11498
-
Karma: 327
says the dude that doesnt have a clue as to wtf is going on and doesnt know people have different views on the ski industry and how they want to place themselves in it.
the peters are great skiers everyone knows this,(no hate) but will they ever be a simon dumont or tom wallisch no... so why not rep a company hard and have a pro model and just love what you are doing. I think they realize they arent going to be able to live the rest of their lives on skiing but why not have as much fun and do what YOU want and not what the little newschooler punk wants you to do?
to some people its about having fun and doing what you want not what other people want you to do you might not understand this concept.
Posts: 984
-
Karma: 250
i admire your passion and indignation, but have you actually read his posts in this thread?? mr. peters is claiming he gets unfair exposure because his sponsors don't fork out the cash. try to reconcile that with what you just wrote.
the dude utterly lacks the "perspective" on the ski industry that you attribute to him. he seems to think he's entitled to the exposure of a pro at another company . . . a pro that has risen through the ranks and justifies the investment.
Posts: 6239
-
Karma: 2,356
Posts: 9006
-
Karma: 780
I'm not pretending, I honestly couldn't give a fuck. It's not my business, why go prying?
Posts: 984
-
Karma: 250
on second thought, you're right. he's a cool dude and i owe him an apology. i got the wrong impression and i wish him well. i'll think twice about running my mouth next time. i've actually been a fan of his skiing for a long time, and thought his forward blunt 10 was the best trick at west coast sessions a few years back.
Posts: 11498
-
Karma: 327
so if he wanted to switch do get in movies and make money why doesnt he switch companies?
Posts: 5786
-
Karma: 4,457
wow you really called someone out for their grammar? how big of a deushebag are you in real life?
Posts: 239
-
Karma: 1,258
haha kinda a slap in the face to 9, they give him a pro model and he leaves
Posts: 39
-
Karma: 10
haha this thread rocks. like i said earlier though, 9s got nothing on dynastar
Posts: 159
-
Karma: -105
was this just an excuse to show everyone how shit your dubs are?
Posts: 10
-
Karma: 10
9s are the sickest skis in the universe and about the only ski company in the world that makes skis under 160 cm but with the same construction as the bigger skis. and these days it is almost impossible to get good skis under 160 cm. trust me im 13 and a midget
All times are Eastern (-4)
