Red Bull Unrailistic | LIVE Broadcast

Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

LINE ELizabeth Durability

profile picture
cbeebzthasteeze
Posts: 1862 - Karma: 85
First off, I did searchbar. So I'm looking for a new park ski, and everyone who has the Lizzies loves them. I have Atomic Urban Punx right now, and I want something fatter. The only thing I am worried about is LINE's durability. I've seen edge rip-outs, delams, and I don't want to buy a ski that will break when I use it. For reference, I am 5'9", 140 pounds, and a type 2.5 skier who does primarily park but does a few trees and groomers, and that occasional East Coast "powder" day.
Apr 4 2010 12:45PM
0 0
profile picture
jibjunkie
Posts: 3807 - Karma: 191
they sound perfect for you. as far as durability they are sidewall so you may get some chipping but unless you hit constant rails which it doesnt sound like you will your edges should be fine. they are great skis the only damage ive ever heard of is a binding ripout but that was one person and ive seen other poeple on their third mount on lizzies not having any problems. get em while you can and enjoy em!
Apr 4 2010 12:56PM
0 0
profile picture
cbeebzthasteeze
Posts: 1862 - Karma: 85
Thank you. For another reference, I do about 60%/40% boxes and rails/jumps, but that's because my punx were too narrow and soft to hit any, so those numbers might change.
Apr 4 2010 12:58PM
0 0
profile picture
jibjunkie
Posts: 3807 - Karma: 191
true the lizzies are prolly gonna be similar in flex pattern but the width helps
Apr 4 2010 1:10PM
0 0
profile picture
El_Barto.
Posts: 11630 - Karma: 24,465
not sure what the flex is like on the urban punx but lizzies are way softer than my regular punx
Apr 4 2010 1:30PM
0 0
profile picture
I_liketobutter
Posts: 2664 - Karma: 997
super durable, they're $600, so they are going too be built better than $300 invaders.

140 days on one pair
180+ on my current ones, had a small edge tear out under foot this year from casing a flat down disaster, but got it replaced and has held up just fine so far.

youll get a lot of top sheet chipping at the edge, but after a while its kinda just rounds itself off. though its never affected the durability in any way.
Apr 4 2010 2:29PM
0 0
profile picture
207
Posts: 8969 - Karma: 3,846
I thought yu h8ed line?
Apr 4 2010 4:28PM
0 0
profile picture
cbeebzthasteeze
Posts: 1862 - Karma: 85
Haha no Joey. I don't like the Afterbangs.
Apr 4 2010 9:39PM
0 0
profile picture
B-runge
Posts: 16558 - Karma: 360
uh theyre great untill your dumbass shop mounts them 5CM INFRONT OF FUCKING CENTER
Apr 4 2010 9:41PM
0 0
profile picture
cbeebzthasteeze
Posts: 1862 - Karma: 85
Hahaha I read that post. The fucking blows heavy chode.
Apr 4 2010 9:48PM
0 0
profile picture
fragglemuffin
Posts: 3312 - Karma: 444
my shop mounted mine backwards, which means that they were a little forward of center...i'm convinced that shops have an anti-lizzie thing going.
Apr 4 2010 9:48PM
0 0
profile picture
a_pla5tic_bag
Posts: 9210 - Karma: 5,357
wait what? haha, where's this thread, they sound like a bunch of idiots.
Apr 4 2010 9:50PM
0 0
profile picture
B-runge
Posts: 16558 - Karma: 360
damn im getting new ones hopefully
im just scared to go in there and demand them
i dont want two fucking holes drilled through my ski right where it will be flexing, god damn it
Apr 4 2010 9:51PM
0 0
profile picture
a_pla5tic_bag
Posts: 9210 - Karma: 5,357
I think sometimes shops could maybe argue about a bad mount, but in front of center is pretty hard to do. The only logical explanation I can think of is that he tried to mount them 5cm back and had the ski backwards.
Apr 4 2010 9:53PM
0 0
profile picture
cbeebzthasteeze
Posts: 1862 - Karma: 85
So how wide are the edges? Are they 1.7mm or 2.5mm, or something in between?
Apr 4 2010 9:56PM
0 0
profile picture
B-runge
Posts: 16558 - Karma: 360
the bindings would be backwards....

and thread is in my threads?

and i think 2.5 cuz of lines "fatty base and edge" mine have about 4 edge cracks after never being tuned and an estimated 100 days of park abuse with lots of rails
Apr 4 2010 9:59PM
0 0
profile picture
cbeebzthasteeze
Posts: 1862 - Karma: 85
Alright thank you.
Apr 5 2010 1:02PM
0 0
profile picture
Twig
Posts: 6336 - Karma: 57,072
I've had two pairs and had no problems so far with either, sold the first, regretted it for a season, bought a new pair. Planning to buy a backup pair this summer too.
Apr 5 2010 1:21PM
0 0
profile picture
Lemuel
Posts: 14477 - Karma: 10,515
I love mine.  They have the standard shitty plastic topsheet cover that every complains about when it chips, but mine haven't yet.  I also only used them probably 10 times but I used them on everything, moguls, powder, rails, jumps, ice...  I absolutely stomped like a 6 foot cliff onto a rock and thought my base was gone, not even a scratch.  The edges are 2.5, I measured them one day.  I highly recommend them.  And don't worry about the topsheet chipping, i does nothing.
Apr 5 2010 4:38PM
0 0
profile picture
cbeebzthasteeze
Posts: 1862 - Karma: 85
So how well will they do on groomers and in the woods on an average East Coast day? So hard pack, with some ice here and there?
Apr 5 2010 9:50PM
0 0
profile picture
Twig
Posts: 6336 - Karma: 57,072
they destroy groomers, bit slow edge to edge but they carve real nice. if you use them on rails they wont hold well on ice but that is true of all skis. i love mine on groomed even with a mild detune underfoot.
Apr 6 2010 4:37AM
0 0
profile picture
ljs
Posts: 501 - Karma: 1,181

Loved my elizabeths. But my sidewalls on both my skis exploded after a good 2 years of hard rail sking.

Apr 6 2010 12:48PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)