Lange inferno boots heard anything ++KARMA++

Are you serious? Can you be any more vague?

it's a lange fluid shell. fits a wider foot with a slightly big heel pocket and an average instep. do yourself a favour and buy a lange banshee boot instead

uhh the inferno boot from last year is the banshee shell. if i remember correctly, since it's not in front of me right now, it doesnt have the gel tongue, and doesnt have an elastic booster strap, and may not have a rubber boot board, and not quite as nice of a liner.

the shell itself is awesome. i ride last year's banshee pros and love them. they're a bit stiff for just messing around on little rails, but for skiing pow, cranking turns, dropping cliffs and hitting jumps, the stability of the boot is unbeatable. i've tried a bunch of boots over the years and i still feel that nothing skis as well as a lange boot, provided you fit into it. go to a shop and try a pair of the banshee shell boots on to make sure they fit though, its a 98mm last, so its pretty slim/low volume.

Thank you ^^^

I was also  looking at the banshee and the Salo SPK

i have a lange Concept 85 or somethin now and lookin for a more flexy boot so Lange seems more of a stability boot am i wrong???

They do have the gel tounge and they also have a somewhat 'softer' boot board.

this is completely false.

anyway i bought infernos in the fall and here is my review after riding them all season (45 days):

Background: I am 17, 6ft tall, 190lbs. Expert skier. East coast. I race for my high school team and otherwise spend my time skiing trees and bumps. I DO NOT ski park and therefore cannot offer information on how they perform within that discipline.

Overall, I have found that these boots work extremely well for my size, weight, ability and preferences. My last pair of boots were Nordica race boots, so I am used to the tight, responsive feel of a race boot. The Infernos, like my Nordicas, have a 98mm last. Many people find that this can be uncomfortably narrow, especially if their feet are on the wider side. Personally, I prefer a tight, responsive fit. They have a well-shaped heel that does an excellent job keeping the rear end of my foot in place. I have never experienced pain from using these boots, and if they fit properly, you shouldn't either. The flex index is 115, though this number is not easy to compare to other boot manufacturers because there is no industry standard for rating boot flex. I would say they are considerably stiffer than the average recreational boot and would be difficult to flex if you're under 170ish pounds and/or not a strong skier. I have found that this is a comfortable "in-between" flex for me- it is stiff enough to be responsive when carving yet soft enough not to sink my skis in powder or kill my shins in bumps. If you look at pictures, the white part of the boot is a softer plastic than the black part, so you get an even, predictable flex without compromising response. The liners are a bit more comfortable than a race liner, but I would still consider them a dense, performance-oriented liner. The part around the foot does not pack out much.The toe box of the liner is a bit softer and expands a little bit. The cuff and tongue of the liner are softer yet still responsive. The inside of the tongue has a rubber/gel piece that adds comfort and reduces shin bang. All four of the buckles are metal and microadjustable, making it easy to dial in your preferred fit. The velcro strap at the top works well, keeping the tongue against your ankle, which improves response and diminishes shin bang.

forgot to mention that im selling a pair. the ones listed for sale are not the ones i rode all season. they are a size too small for me and were only ridden a few times. i bought the same boots in a 28 and loved them- thats where the review came from.

 https://www.newschoolers.com/web/forums/readthread/thread_id/513247/