Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Sweden introduces carbon footprint label on food products

profile picture
Obsessedwski
Posts: 2261 - Karma: 71
Sweden just introduced a system in which food products will not only have nutritional information on them, but will also have a carbon footprint label, which will show the carbon emissions produced by that item.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/23/world/europe/23degrees.html

I think this is definitely a step in the right direction, Sweden seems to be doing a pretty good job of it recently, introducing a "congestion charge" in August of 2007.


Oct 24 2009 3:31AM
0 0
profile picture
Mr.Panda
Posts: 17711 - Karma: 564
I am tired, and going to bed so I didn't read the link.  WHY does FOOD need a carbon footprint label?  For the gas that is expelled when people fart, burp, or shit?  Or is the footprint coming from what it takes to make it?
Oct 24 2009 3:41AM
0 0
profile picture
Kevski
Posts: 7056 - Karma: 2,785
I'll give this a good read when I'm not fucking shittered. Global warming is a big deal so I thnk is sounds like a good idea. I'll watch the lingk later though.
Oct 24 2009 3:50AM
0 0
profile picture
Obsessedwski
Posts: 2261 - Karma: 71
Please tell me you're just tired as hell, otherwise I'd have to say you're utterly and depressingly ignorant.
Oct 24 2009 4:07AM
0 0
profile picture
Mr.Panda
Posts: 17711 - Karma: 564
No, I figure it is coming from the pollution created when they process and make it but it just seems strange that they will need to put the carbon footprint info on a bag of Doritos.  The bag could quite honestly create a bigger footprint in the process of making the bag than the making of the chips in it.


I am still tired as fuck.  Midterms this week, haven't had a full night sleep in like 4 days.  Been on average 3 hours a night.
Oct 24 2009 4:20AM
0 0
profile picture
Obsessedwski
Posts: 2261 - Karma: 71
Ah, I see.

Yea I would assume its from transportation. It would help for the more simple stuff, but I agree on what you said about packaging and what not. In reality, its impossible to track the carbon footprint of anything really, since you can go forever counting the stuff the truck transporting it's made of, how that material was transported, etc.

Its a step though, and every bit counts.

I hope all that studying pays off, good luck on your midterms.
Oct 24 2009 4:27AM
0 0
profile picture
Mr.Panda
Posts: 17711 - Karma: 564
Yeah, they were this week though so I am all done with them.  Time for a cuddle and my 21st tomorrow.  Drink myself to sleep.
Oct 24 2009 4:36AM
0 0
profile picture
Frank_Spinatra
Posts: 1203 - Karma: 75
id like to know what the carbon footprint of carbon footprint labels is
Oct 24 2009 4:40AM
0 0
profile picture
Obsessedwski
Posts: 2261 - Karma: 71
Shouldn't be much since it'll be added on to the already existing nutritional label; they're not making another individual label to stick on the products.
Oct 24 2009 4:43AM
0 0
profile picture
Mr.Panda
Posts: 17711 - Karma: 564
It takes people time and a process to calculate the carbon footprint, these people eat processed food which causes pollution.  Yes, I am trying to connect everything in a really REALLY long shot.
Oct 24 2009 4:47AM
0 0
profile picture
Ben.
Posts: 21463 - Karma: 683
global warming is fake. money is everything, and it costs way to much money to fight climate change. here let me post graphs x, y, and z, all skewed by my political position of choice to support said position. obama is a socialist big government is taking over blah blah blah



here, ill cover the opposition as well


global warming is real because its hot out, and al gore says so. also climate change is the trendy thing to be fighting right now. here are my graphs x, y, and z, also skewed to support my desired position. conservatives hate the planet, its all george bushes fault, blah blah blah.



this will repeat throughout this thread. the end
Oct 24 2009 4:51AM
0 0
profile picture
Frank_Spinatra
Posts: 1203 - Karma: 75
I like the idea for sure, i'm just not positive about the effect it will make.  Doesn't hurt to try.  Bottom line is we need to find ways to limit our impact.  Once we decide to stop being so fat that will help in a lot of ways.
Oct 24 2009 4:51AM
0 0
profile picture
Static
Posts: 8494 - Karma: 4,068
tell that to the Australians
Oct 24 2009 4:52AM
0 0
profile picture
Mr.Panda
Posts: 17711 - Karma: 564
I like my fucking burgers though you bitch.
Oct 24 2009 4:54AM
0 0
profile picture
Obsessedwski
Posts: 2261 - Karma: 71
hahaha
Oct 24 2009 4:55AM
0 0
profile picture
Frank_Spinatra
Posts: 1203 - Karma: 75
well you can like whatever the hell you want,  just don't feel obligated to down 10 burgers a day.  moderation is key, although since you're turning 21 i shouldn't be speaking to you of moderation. (where'd your bday thread go?)

and as for the Australian's comment above, you can't tell them anything.  I've never trusted any of those convicts.
Oct 24 2009 5:01AM
0 0
profile picture
Mr.Panda
Posts: 17711 - Karma: 564
It's still on the front page someplace I believe.  Look for a thread started by a pink name.



Yes, moderation is key.  But I haven't had a good burger in ages.  Must, have, good, burger.
Oct 24 2009 5:04AM
0 0
profile picture
Frank_Spinatra
Posts: 1203 - Karma: 75
Click for larger image
Oct 24 2009 5:17AM
0 0
profile picture
pmills
Posts: 7162 - Karma: 59
just to point out what 'moderation' means, American's consume, on average, 3 hamburgers a week, that's an  excessive amount
Oct 24 2009 9:16AM
0 0
profile picture
Obsessedwski
Posts: 2261 - Karma: 71
hah
Oct 25 2009 1:50AM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)