Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

K2 makes BIG SKIS

profile picture
TannerBalls
Posts: 3197 - Karma: 1,310
k2 skis are bigger than other skis, my 180 candides are smaller than 179 PE by 3 inches!!




A 100 PERCENT CHANCE OF SNOW SHOWERS... HEAVY SNOW ACCUMULATIONS POSSIBLE. HIGHS IN THE LOWER 30S.
Dec 29 2003 12:17AM
0 0
profile picture
CalgaryJibber
Posts: 1828 - Karma: 19
CONGRATULATIONS! thats sooo sick dogg what an effective use of NS space- join my club man you tha man

stop it with the fuckin gay posts!! GNARLAY!

XXXX-Lego Maniac-XXXX
Dec 29 2003 12:26AM
0 0
profile picture
mikee
Posts: 7813 - Karma: 5
I think a 159 K2 ski will actually be 163 and therefore a 179 will be 183 or whatever.

-Michael Lifshitz-
Dec 29 2003 12:27AM
0 0
profile picture
TannerBalls
Posts: 3197 - Karma: 1,310
yeah somthin like that




A 100 PERCENT CHANCE OF SNOW SHOWERS... HEAVY SNOW ACCUMULATIONS POSSIBLE. HIGHS IN THE LOWER 30S.
Dec 29 2003 12:28AM
0 0
profile picture
SkiFree_MT
Posts: 395 - Karma: 9
this thread is a big waste of space moron
Dec 29 2003 12:30AM
0 0
profile picture
Roussel
Posts: 686 - Karma: 41
fuck it, lets waste the space, what has NS done for us lately anyways? nothign! THE'VE DONE NOTHIGN!
-----------
The Roussel
Dec 29 2003 12:33AM
0 0
profile picture
3ski6guy0
Posts: 9201 - Karma: 132
how do i say this nicely. PLEASE SHUT THE FUCK UP MAN
********* ********* *********
LAND SHARK!!! EEEEE EEEEEE EEEEEEE
Dec 29 2003 12:33AM
0 0
profile picture
mikee
Posts: 7813 - Karma: 5
Actually its not, we are discussing a fucking weird system of measuring skis that k2 has. So do you think that the ski si just measured without te tail or something?

-Michael Lifshitz-
Dec 29 2003 12:34AM
0 0
profile picture
TannerBalls
Posts: 3197 - Karma: 1,310
I don't think that was nice---a nice way would have been...please stop posting this moronic poopy!




A 100 PERCENT CHANCE OF SNOW SHOWERS... HEAVY SNOW ACCUMULATIONS POSSIBLE. HIGHS IN THE LOWER 30S.
Dec 29 2003 12:34AM
0 0
profile picture
CalgaryJibber
Posts: 1828 - Karma: 19
actually it is its prolly just the runing length of the ski on the k2's and the tip to tial baselength on the dynastars- if your wanna know get a tape measurer out


XXXX-Lego Maniac-XXXX
Dec 29 2003 1:24AM
0 0
profile picture
mammothpunks
Posts: 5724 - Karma: 372
the big kahunas are real skis. None of your pussy small skis can compare


'I should put my camera on a tripod - its easier to drink beer that way' - dirty steve
NS royal gangstar
Dec 29 2003 3:23AM
0 0
profile picture
ottoponto
Posts: 295 - Karma: 28
so what's 'running lenght' ?
Dec 29 2003 3:45AM
0 0
profile picture
Nix
Posts: 734 - Karma: 10
does this guy EVER post worthwhile threads?



who u think u foolin', FOO?
Dec 29 2003 3:50AM
0 0
profile picture
Insomniac
Posts: 2816 - Karma: 185
i think running length is how the ski messures without the tip and the tail. the tip might actually be in running length, but without ne k2 skis i cant tell. running lenght is how much of the ski is on the snow. but i dont know if they count the tip in that. and k2 should just messure shit the right way
_________________________________________________________________________________ The above comment is the views and opinions of I, Craige Diaz and I hereby accept no responibility for them.




NewSchoolSnow
Dec 29 2003 10:54AM
0 0
profile picture
Powderdayz
Posts: 1881 - Karma: 10
kaHunaS r bEastlY













'crooks is bad at life......' -maier
Dec 29 2003 12:08PM
0 0
profile picture
KZA
Posts: 3304 - Karma: 301
they measure only whats on the ground, so like not tail or tip
Dec 29 2003 12:38PM
0 0
profile picture
mark311
Posts: 508 - Karma: 21
yeah, some companies actually measure tip to tail, while others just measure running length, which is what part of the ski is on the ground.
Dec 29 2003 12:44PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)