Red Bull Unrailistic | LIVE Broadcast

Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Fattest skis around?

profile picture
sconnyFC
Posts: 2197 - Karma: 76
anybody see these yet?  found 'em on mySpace.  unreal!!!

242-200-240

Click for larger image
Dec 18 2007 12:18PM
0 0
profile picture
wrenegade
Posts: 6631 - Karma: 41
There comes a point where such things are overkill.
Dec 18 2007 12:28PM
0 0
profile picture
P.J.S.
Posts: 1782 - Karma: 11
Very true, they could however be extremely fun to try out on an insanely deep day.
Dec 18 2007 12:32PM
0 0
profile picture
Tinga
Posts: 11349 - Karma: 2,333
haha on myspace. haha and theyre called the bff thats pretty funny as well
Dec 18 2007 12:35PM
0 0
profile picture
jhackbeez
Posts: 2136 - Karma: 258
im sure some asshole would ride those in park tho....
Dec 18 2007 1:27PM
0 0
profile picture
Mr.LemonPie
Posts: 4100 - Karma: 1,625
I would ride those in park just to scare people...20 cm thick, that is like 9 inches. Where can you buy them? Because they aren't on liberty's website.
Dec 18 2007 1:31PM
0 0
profile picture
ESfreeridepa
Posts: 2204 - Karma: 11
 jay kay like err day
Dec 18 2007 1:39PM
0 0
profile picture
Fish_Sandwich.
Posts: 9108 - Karma: 16
That is getting out of hand.  Then again people said that when they all rode 50 mm waisted skis.  As far as I cann tell right now, there is no need for anything more than 130 underfoot.
Dec 18 2007 1:46PM
0 0
profile picture
brenker
Posts: 3188 - Karma: 71
^^yea id second that
Dec 18 2007 2:27PM
0 0
profile picture
VTtreeskier
Posts: 1833 - Karma: 64
Got a feeling theyr prob not for sale to the public, just a hunch
Dec 18 2007 2:31PM
0 0
profile picture
iggyskier
Posts: 10434 - Karma: 9,753
HAHAHA. That is great.
Dec 18 2007 2:46PM
0 0
profile picture
.Capn.
Posts: 1454 - Karma: 152
I believe they have fins on the bottom tho which would make that tough
Dec 18 2007 3:47PM
0 0
profile picture
miroz
Posts: 10333 - Karma: 3,947

Shane McConkey skied water skis...

those are incredibly FAT

Dec 18 2007 3:50PM
0 0
profile picture
currentwestman
Posts: 3292 - Karma: 330
why would they be an asshole if they rode those in the park? i think it would be pretty fricken hilarious
Dec 18 2007 3:57PM
0 0
profile picture
HiroProtagonist
Posts: 304 - Karma: 11
"Sir, would you like to upgrade your skis to 'Epic'?"


Dec 18 2007 11:46PM
0 0
profile picture
alaskakid
Posts: 5540 - Karma: 430
Wow. Imagine the weight...
Dec 18 2007 11:50PM
0 0
profile picture
emopoppins
Posts: 3996 - Karma: 269
yay, why do you need soemthing that wide, yay!!
Dec 19 2007 12:05AM
0 0
profile picture
P.J.S.
Posts: 1782 - Karma: 11
Why not? It's cool to see such an extreme, I highly doubt it will become mainstream. But at least there are people out there trying new things and new ways to slide down the mountain.
Dec 19 2007 12:07AM
0 0
profile picture
poofartpee
Posts: 7436 - Karma: 1,537
BFF???? Big Fat Fuck???
Dec 19 2007 12:31AM
0 0
profile picture
tjski
Posts: 5859 - Karma: 44
*corection* BFF: BIGGEST FATTEST FUCKER
Dec 19 2007 12:40AM
0 0
profile picture
-Nick-
Posts: 1479 - Karma: 24
hahaha those look like snowboards
Dec 19 2007 12:54AM
0 0
profile picture
Jwalk
Posts: 4647 - Karma: 134
thats a little bit over board but look extremely fun to ride for a day
Dec 19 2007 12:58AM
0 0
profile picture
AltaByrdSkier
Posts: 544 - Karma: 15
i saw those in a photo the other day they are rediculous
Dec 19 2007 12:58AM
0 0
profile picture
powder_weasel
Posts: 382 - Karma: 9

The fattest ski that you can currently buy is most likely the Monstre Fat:
http://www.duretskis.com/index.php?idarticle=289

It is basically two slightly modified Duret monoskis.

Dec 19 2007 1:03AM
0 0
profile picture
Silence
Posts: 16030 - Karma: 149
I dare someone to try and bend brakes around those suckers..

You would seriously need custom length brake arms - no normal brake would work - even if you could bend them around..

Thats seriously hilarious though..20cm wide.
Dec 19 2007 5:45AM
0 0
profile picture
grams.
Posts: 7406 - Karma: 186
That's just retarded fat. Even on a huge deep day you wouldn't even sink in the pow...no fun!
Dec 19 2007 6:32AM
0 0
profile picture
Steezasaurus
Posts: 796 - Karma: -53

now i think theres such thing as too big for a pair of baords

Dec 19 2007 9:02AM
0 0
profile picture
drwclrk
Posts: 1114 - Karma: 718
eventually people are just going to use 2 snowboards...
Dec 19 2007 9:11AM
0 0
profile picture
bbtkd1
Posts: 113 - Karma: 15
yeah those are really big
Dec 19 2007 9:27AM
0 0
profile picture
alev
Posts: 7819 - Karma: 410
they look like two carving swallowtail snowboards with bindings on it, really. but liberty of all companies would be idiots to try to produce a ski like that.

secondly those would be really dangerous for your knees. youd be turning and be about 8 inches off the ground...
Dec 19 2007 10:27AM
0 0
profile picture
GANDALF
Posts: 6285 - Karma: 6,433
i wonder if anyone could do anything over a 180 on those
Dec 19 2007 11:46AM
0 0
profile picture
Steezasaurus
Posts: 796 - Karma: -53
yeah but he didint actually "ski" with them. he just slid down the side of a steep. STill porps to him
Dec 19 2007 3:46PM
0 0
profile picture
ValPow
Posts: 1049 - Karma: 10
they'd be wierd to ski on but i reckon pretty good fun.

No need for them in my opinion tho
Dec 19 2007 6:29PM
0 0
profile picture
KRAMPUSNTROLLZ
Posts: 2715 - Karma: 355
or just to take water skiing
Dec 19 2007 6:40PM
0 0
profile picture
KRAMPUSNTROLLZ
Posts: 2715 - Karma: 355
yeah i wouldn't want to try a 200 ski cause i mean it would be really really hard to turn and you would never sink in and out of the powder it is fun to go in and come out not just skim on top the whole time
Dec 19 2007 6:42PM
0 0
profile picture
masta_LE3B
Posts: 3397 - Karma: 62
looks like it would be fun tree skiing, you could match any border now with 50/50 slides on rails, easyily
Dec 19 2007 7:20PM
0 0
profile picture
jeremy.g
Posts: 4931 - Karma: 459
hahahahaha........................................yes
Dec 19 2007 7:32PM
0 0
profile picture
KeithB.
Posts: 608 - Karma: 12
Looks like you would have to be pretty wide hipped to ski those fuckers and not be on your inside edge the whole time, maybe it doesn't matter in the depth of snow they are meant for
Dec 19 2007 7:50PM
0 0
profile picture
duretskis
Posts: 3 - Karma: 10
For the Monstre FAT you could watch the video sequence at the end of the clip of the skis monstre fat
on www.duretskis.com/medias.php
these days just him arrive to ride with 1, 5meters of windly snow
others swim and perhaps swim ever

The skis for the biggest conditions

it's better for opinion
the Act II arrive soon

Check video Skipopow et Airpopow au passage

soon
Dec 20 2007 3:45AM
0 0
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61107 - Karma: 118,282
135 on my args is pushing it, and thats with reverse sidecut too.
Dec 20 2007 4:29AM
0 0
profile picture
powder_weasel
Posts: 382 - Karma: 9
Thats what I said! Thanks Duret Dude
Dec 20 2007 5:34AM
0 0
profile picture
sconnyFC
Posts: 2197 - Karma: 76
actually, they are called the "Big Fat Fuckers".  and yes, they do look like swallow-tail boards to me too.
Dec 21 2007 12:27AM
0 0
profile picture
sdfjklioeur
Posts: 2082 - Karma: 114
monoski almost
Dec 21 2007 12:31AM
0 0
profile picture
schlonginator
Posts: 3971 - Karma: 27
You would have to ride those like you ride a horse. Knees wider than your shoulders... just a thought where on earth is the snow that fluffy that you need 200mm under foot? Also if you don't want to sink into snow that bad go ride groomers.
Dec 21 2007 6:08AM
0 0
profile picture
BEARS.
Posts: 5380 - Karma: 696
oh shianp
Dec 28 2007 2:23PM
0 0
profile picture
theres_ghosts
Posts: 875 - Karma: 13
that would be like strapping two surf boards on your feet. 


and they legit fat skis are like 140 and i still think that is pushing it
Dec 28 2007 2:46PM
0 0
profile picture
zerospinskier
Posts: 4867 - Karma: 350
Hahaha
Dec 28 2007 3:01PM
0 0
profile picture
Klick_2_klaim
Posts: 3396 - Karma: 25
so haha, ummm, i look at these SKIS  and think, well what would mcconkey do?
i think he would probably say "you call those skis? these are skis!!!" and he would whip out some wakeboards mounted up with cross country bindings. then go scarachoute everest.
Dec 28 2007 4:54PM
0 0
profile picture
Silence
Posts: 16030 - Karma: 149
^ hahaha
Dec 28 2007 5:05PM
0 0
profile picture
TheMoostafian
Posts: 4504 - Karma: 9,438
haha well yeah alot of people have mentioned shane mcconkey

he rode waterskis.....and im pretty sure he mounted 2 snowboards and rode them for a little bit
Dec 28 2007 5:13PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)