Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
my thoughts on the movie.
Religion is a modern (actual) mythology. It is regarded the same way greek mythology (yup, zeus, aries and all those gods) was regarded thousands of years ago. It dosen't neccisaraly rip off other religions. Its like a copy with no original (a good example of this phenominom is ciment. The romans were the first to invent ciment only for it to be lost and then rediscoverd centuries later. If roman ciment was the original, dose that neccisaraly mean that the guy who reinvented ciment copied them? Maybe he got the idea from them, but worked it out on his own, just like with religion.)
But all in all i too belive religion is complete BULL SHIT.
The whole 9/11 incident is quit convinient, but the question is for who? The Affgans didn't get anything from it, Osama had to live in a hole because of it, the US goverment had a CAUSE to go to war. The thing is that war means money, lots of it. And if the whole loaning with intrest stuff is correct, then the central bank would make a shit load of money. Lets not forget that a shit load of money can make people do pretty much anything.
The people in power had many motives to join WWI, WWII and and start the Vietnam war. mostley money and power. The idea that the Vietnam war was never ment to be won, but to but sustaind has alot of logic to it. the longer the war goes on, the more money the banks loan, the more intrest that has to be returned, the more money in the bankers wallets. But a country can't just go to war, their has to be a reason for it to do so. The sinking of the Lusitania gave reason for America to enter WWI, Pearl Harbor for WWII, and the Vietnames attack against amircan forces for Vietnam. Keeping in mind that history repets itself, it would be very logical that 9/11 was the cause of the war on terror, but the motives for all those wars aren't 100% clear.
If the US goverment was behind the first 3 incedents (as it would seem, all those could have been easily avoided), wouldn't it be logical for them to be behind 9/11.
Plus, i doubt that 2 plains could do so much damage to 3 buildings in NY.
The media shows you only what it wants you to know. Little reporters have the balls to put everything on the line and go after those corrupt basterds in power.