Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Chick skis 4 a dude

profile picture
oldskewl
Posts: 457 - Karma: 10
I have a pal that is a dealer for line and he has a pr of line 167 chick skis brand spankin new and will sell 'em 2 me for 120 bux. I'd just use them in the park...what u think??
Feb 8 2007 7:29PM
0 0
profile picture
ktollefson_1080
Posts: 2061 - Karma: 183
do u have a vagina?
Feb 8 2007 7:30PM
0 0
profile picture
garrett.
Posts: 9304 - Karma: 3,670
well see first you need to learn how to spell
Feb 8 2007 7:31PM
0 0
profile picture
BusyJohnSohn
Posts: 3483 - Karma: 29

I don't know about other people but I would probably rip on you all day.  It depends if they look too like pink and shit or not.  I know line has the shadow or whatever which actually doesnt look that bad.

Feb 8 2007 7:32PM
0 0
profile picture
oldskewl
Posts: 457 - Karma: 10
no I have a p-ness...thats y I asked.

its a serious question im 6' 190...wonderin if maybe too soft and I break em easy if I land back seat or sumthing
Feb 8 2007 7:32PM
0 0
profile picture
*rkp*
Posts: 8198 - Karma: 257
how much do you weigh.   if it's not too much, they should be good for you.    hell i'd ride the ARW's if they came in a longer size.
Feb 8 2007 7:33PM
0 0
profile picture
oldskewl
Posts: 457 - Karma: 10
Thanks for the serious reply. The reason why i am considering is b/c I have pocket rocket 185's and they are a big heavy ski...and going more than 540 is tough for me and I figure a lighter smaller ski would be more fun...and the price is so right
Feb 8 2007 7:37PM
0 0
profile picture
CTD
Posts: 6300 - Karma: 348
this better be a joke. your fucking 6 ft and 190?!? are you kidding. those skis are designed for someone roughly 6 inches shorter than you and 50 lbs lighter. and you must be one hell of a pussy if you think 185 PRs are big and heavy. im 150 lbs and ski shit like that all day everywhere, as do most people on this site. if you were a small dude and wanted the soft flex, than hell yea. but not at your size.
Feb 8 2007 7:44PM
0 0
profile picture
doublexl
Posts: 8407 - Karma: 26
i saw this guy, like 6'6", on 151 mynx. he looked so fuckin gay.
Feb 8 2007 7:46PM
0 0
profile picture
oldskewl
Posts: 457 - Karma: 10
That is quite a hostile reply friend. The PR's are heavier than any other ski I have seen in the park. The reason why I posted was to get a knowledgable reply.
Feb 8 2007 7:49PM
0 0
profile picture
psychkub
Posts: 1788 - Karma: 16
Sorry bub, but those skis would be way too small and probably way too soft too. If you're having trouble with 185s, step it down to 179cm skis, they'll probably be more maneuverable for you.
Feb 8 2007 7:56PM
0 0
profile picture
jiblove
Posts: 1228 - Karma: 18
i have 171 arws
and my guy friends rip in the park with em all the time
they dont care
even though there are sexy shirtless boys on them
Feb 8 2007 7:56PM
0 0
profile picture
mad_540_trix
Posts: 2452 - Karma: 14

nevertheless, he's right.   the pocket rockets aren't very heavy, what kinda crack are you on?

Feb 8 2007 7:57PM
0 0
profile picture
Dustin.
Posts: 13839 - Karma: 7,704
i wouldn't be suprised if you broke those skis. i would buy them and then sell them to a girl who needs some. great price
Feb 8 2007 8:04PM
0 0
profile picture
skier24
Posts: 1216 - Karma: 11
do that.
its the smart thing to do.
Feb 8 2007 8:07PM
0 0
profile picture
tSki
Posts: 956 - Karma: 171
ha that would be so gay and unpractictal for soemone your size, buy them and re sell
Feb 8 2007 8:09PM
0 0
profile picture
oldskewl
Posts: 457 - Karma: 10
thanks for the responses...thats why I asked (I had a feeling they were way too small and soft)...I will not purchase them
Feb 8 2007 8:12PM
0 0
profile picture
rocktheLPs
Posts: 2095 - Karma: 14
bahahahahahhahahahahahhaha

uh well you could

hahahahahahhahahahah.
Feb 8 2007 8:13PM
0 0
profile picture
lalalalaura
Posts: 6753 - Karma: 68
6 foot and 167s? ehhh i dont know, they might be "fun" but like, they aren't designed for your body structure, and you'll probably not get the most out of them. If they were more appropriate for your height and weight I don't see a problem...
Feb 8 2007 8:14PM
0 0
profile picture
shrEddie
Posts: 5117 - Karma: 65

woah woah woah,  6foot 190 lbs.  on a womens 167.    NEVER.  if you were maybe 5'4" and like 115 and an intermediate skier, then i would say sure it doesnt make a difference, but i would say that is a very bad idea

Feb 8 2007 9:31PM
0 0
profile picture
KillerMonkey
Posts: 6435 - Karma: 108
Go for it so I can laugh at you when I see some 6ft newb with some short ass girl line skis and then snaps them when he tries to carve.
Feb 8 2007 9:37PM
0 0
profile picture
Flo_Rida_2016
Posts: 2804 - Karma: -5
I wouldnt. Theyll be too soft and youre not a small guy. Plus everyones gonna make fun of you.
Feb 8 2007 9:39PM
0 0
profile picture
CTD
Posts: 6300 - Karma: 348
nah dude, come on. everyone knows at least the basics of ski sizing, and with that little bit of info, and the fact that its a womens ski, i think you should be able to put the pieces together to figure out that it is a dumb idea. and as for my comment on the PRs, nope. no way. those skis are actually fairly light, specially for thier size. being a 6 ft 190 lb guy, id imagine you have at least some muscle structure, and should have ZERO problems throwing that ski around. if you want something a little more jump/park friendly, an equally long, slightly narrower twin. but really, you shouldnt have a problem crankin that ski around.
Feb 8 2007 9:41PM
0 0
profile picture
jwhyte
Posts: 596 - Karma: 21
line girl skis are SHIT
Feb 8 2007 9:54PM
0 0
profile picture
timoski
Posts: 3036 - Karma: 45
a must

Click for larger image
Feb 8 2007 9:57PM
0 0
profile picture
Aenigma
Posts: 11256 - Karma: 424
I'm 30 pounds lighter than you and I found the PR's to be way too soft and light for regular riding.  For park they were great, but everywhere else they were easily overpowered an unstable. 


However, if you really do think PR's are heavy maybe you should ride a 167 women's ski.
Feb 8 2007 10:07PM
0 0
profile picture
CTD
Posts: 6300 - Karma: 348
hahaha yup. no shit.
Feb 8 2007 10:26PM
0 0
profile picture
drewsmom
Posts: 42 - Karma: 10
alright bitches, I am five feet, six inches, weigh 135-40 pounds (depending on my current colon status) and ski the 181 Armada Pipe Cleaner for my park/jib/all mountain ski. If i can get them around with out a problem in the park/on rails there is honestly no reason you need a woman's ski..that is unless you have a strange attraction to snolerblades, in which case I would highly reccomend them
Feb 8 2007 11:01PM
0 0
profile picture
Grimace.
Posts: 8345 - Karma: 25
i'd make fun of you because of the length, not ski.
Feb 8 2007 11:15PM
0 0
profile picture
james44
Posts: 3323 - Karma: 578
hahaha im 5'4" and i ride 161s
Feb 8 2007 11:20PM
0 0
profile picture
TWoods
Posts: 10014 - Karma: 8,385
I'm 6' and 160... I ride 190s and 186s, real fat. If you think that the PRs are too heavy and long, then you must be a p.... no.... you are an alias.

Chilll out guys, this isn't serious. he's obviously an alias
Feb 9 2007 12:28AM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)