Member of the Month

JalmarKalmar
April, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

T-Halls or Fujatives?

profile picture
Hobo_De_Esquiar
Posts: 154 - Karma: 64
So, I've been skiing on AR5s for 3 seasons and they have no edges anymore. I have a pair of Seth Viciouses (I never could figure out how to pluralize that name), so I want a pair of park specific skis. I was just wondering if there is much of a difference between the T-Halls & the Fujatives. I would prefer to spend as little cash as possible, but I don't want to sacrifice too much performance.
Jan 25 2007 1:33PM
0 0
profile picture
BigJew
Posts: 6974 - Karma: 79
They're both pretty soft but I'd get Fujatives, they're incredibly cheap and make a decent park ski.
Jan 25 2007 1:36PM
0 0
profile picture
dat_ski_dude
Posts: 554 - Karma: 15
if your wanting to save cash get the fujis. great ski super poppy and durable ive got a pair and luv em. needless to say ive never ridden t halls but ive heard nothing but good things
Jan 25 2007 1:37PM
0 0
profile picture
smokeblunts
Posts: 414 - Karma: 10
...t-hall
Jan 25 2007 1:43PM
0 0
profile picture
Rez4frederick
Posts: 4740 - Karma: 40
def get fujis if u want to save money. 
Jan 25 2007 1:43PM
0 0
profile picture
tribefan226
Posts: 2122 - Karma: 209
fujis
Jan 25 2007 3:33PM
0 0
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61146 - Karma: 118,672
If you loved your ar5s and the construction and such, get the thalls. If you want to try cap construction and different specs, get the fujis.
Jan 25 2007 3:35PM
0 0
profile picture
MEGAZORD
Posts: 4531 - Karma: -7
Yeah spending money sucks. 
Jan 25 2007 3:35PM
0 0
profile picture
lyndon
Posts: 7266 - Karma: 127
lol.

Ive demoed the fujis, and own t-halls. I would say t-halls. The fujis felt bulky to me. I demoed a 169, and i ride a 176 t-hall. My t-halls feel so much more agile and manuverable than the fujis. only downside is the topsheep chips around the sidewall very easy, but just epoxy the chips down, and your golden.
Jan 27 2007 7:32PM
0 0
profile picture
poofartpee
Posts: 7436 - Karma: 1,537
t-hall prob is the better overall ski but since u want to spend as littile money as possible the fungative sounds like ur ski...unless u can find a rockin deal for some t-halls
Jan 27 2007 8:11PM
0 0
profile picture
rockymountainmilitia
Posts: 2706 - Karma: 12
whats the difference? come one man, on ski is made of cheap materials with a cap construction so they can lower the price. the other ski has a a higher quality core and is built better and will last longer. Dont compare a price line ski to a park specific top of the line ski. If you have the cash go with the t-hall, you wont regret it.
Jan 27 2007 10:42PM
0 0
profile picture
Pigletpen
Posts: 1137 - Karma: 18
It would be vicious'
and go for the t'halls. i mean he did just win the xgames pipe.. what did pep ever do?
Jan 27 2007 10:54PM
0 0
profile picture
tyfighter
Posts: 36 - Karma: 10
T-Halls all the way...
Jan 27 2007 11:03PM
0 0
profile picture
___ASP___
Posts: 3857 - Karma: 459
your comparing an "ok ski" in the k2 to one of the best park skis ever made in the t hall pro, def go with armada on this one!!!!!!!1
Jan 27 2007 11:53PM
0 0
profile picture
Drewykins
Posts: 230 - Karma: 12
t-halls better constuction, cooler graphics, but if you cant fork over the cash go w/ fujatives
Jan 28 2007 2:12AM
0 0
profile picture
nitsua
Posts: 4631 - Karma: 726
t halls
Jan 28 2007 2:15AM
0 0
profile picture
kabozo101
Posts: 4429 - Karma: 20
fujis if you want to save money but other wise get thalls if you have the extra cash
Jan 28 2007 10:10AM
0 0
profile picture
StanMcStanson
Posts: 2772 - Karma: 1
i demoed t-halls they're sick but they cost a lot. I've got ar6's, but if i was buying a new pair i'd spend the extra money to get t-halls cuz they dominate
Jun 21 2007 1:08PM
0 0
profile picture
B-Har406
Posts: 2484 - Karma: 6
You can get T-Halls on sierrasnowboard.com for around 290. Check that out
Jun 21 2007 1:11PM
0 0
profile picture
Ryanvdonk
Posts: 12808 - Karma: 1,945
silencers seem to do better than fujis. fujis are too soft so they loose their camber really fast and break. it depends on what you like, but if you weigh over 160lbs i'd stay away from the fujis.
Jun 21 2007 1:13PM
0 0
profile picture
CFSGabe
Posts: 354 - Karma: 11
Fuj to save money, really fun ski but they won't last as long as the t-halls, the fuj may last the season prob not, t-halls you will be able to get a few years out of like your ar5
Jun 21 2007 1:16PM
0 0
profile picture
TheButterHashira
Posts: 9691 - Karma: 1,702
i got fujis last season i think theyre still good but 08-09 ill probly fork over some cash for a good pair of lines or armadas
Jun 21 2007 1:29PM
0 0
profile picture
ijibgoremtn
Posts: 4221 - Karma: 13
i hope your not serious
Jun 21 2007 2:02PM
0 0
profile picture
wlm
Posts: 477 - Karma: 176
i've riddn fujatives for 2 seasons and i love them, a little heave but stabil and really soft.. i bet i have bent them about 90ยจ sometimes..
Jun 21 2007 2:05PM
0 0
profile picture
396222687862
Posts: 0 - Karma: 350
i've ridden fujis, and have t halls but havent ridden em. i got thalls for a better deal than fujis, so i can't wait to compare. i'm thinking the t-halls will be better, usually more $$ means better quality. i dunno if they can get any better... i loved my fujis!
Jun 21 2007 4:30PM
0 0
profile picture
invader7
Posts: 5756 - Karma: 49
id say thalls but if you looking for cheap go with the fujis
Jun 21 2007 5:06PM
0 0
profile picture
StanMcStanson
Posts: 2772 - Karma: 1
the fujatives are decent...ive only ridden them for a day, but in my opinion the t-halls are much better if you want a high end floppy park ski
Jun 21 2007 6:23PM
0 0
profile picture
grubix2
Posts: 2628 - Karma: 25
Alright you gotta look at it this way. You want to spend as little cash as possible, right? You can get fugatives for $200. T-Halls on the other hand run about $350 or so.

So you're looking at almost twice the price for the T-Halls. Personally I'd choose the Fugatives for these reasons:

#1 - They're cheap as shit.

#2 - The only real durability issue you're going to be dealing with is the loss of camber. K2 makes good edges, and who really cares about cosmetic stuff?

#3 - Let's say that they only last you 1 year, maybe a little longer. Well if you're abusing the T-halls too, they're probably only last you 2, maybe 3 years at the very most. And that whole time after the first year, you would be riding the T-Halls out of Warrenty. Worst comes to worst... late season... let's say you're fugatives break... guess what, new skis next year.

#4 - Fugatives are a little wider underfoot. Idk personal preference, and plus i think it gives you a little more stability on jumps. (but i know someone is going to jump on my ass about noodles not being stable on jumps either).
Jun 21 2007 6:48PM
0 0
profile picture
grubix2
Posts: 2628 - Karma: 25
I also forgot...

#5 At the end of the year, your fugatives could make a nice beater set for Urban.


Jun 21 2007 6:50PM
0 0
profile picture
Dustin.
Posts: 13839 - Karma: 7,704
over the time period you will have your skis, its worth the money for the better ones
Jun 21 2007 7:37PM
0 0
profile picture
bemmis
Posts: 1602 - Karma: -3
definately t-hall. they are a better ski, no debate. i found t-hallys for $275 in 176 and 181 in you want me to give you the link, tell me.
Jun 21 2007 9:16PM
0 0
profile picture
K2_Pubz_360
Posts: 906 - Karma: 10
what ski is lighter?

...sorry i know this is your thread, but it might help you decide as well as me.
Jun 21 2007 11:19PM
0 0
profile picture
bemmis
Posts: 1602 - Karma: -3
i think t-hall. t-hall is lighter than ar6 which is pretty light. k2s are not known for being light. i could be wrong, but i dont think so.
Jun 21 2007 11:25PM
0 0
profile picture
steezyjibber
Posts: 15967 - Karma: 11,016
t's
Jun 22 2007 9:40AM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)