Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Tight Pants and Skiing

profile picture
2Ski4Life7
Posts: 56 - Karma: 15
I think its cool if they are like not super tight but they are tighter then the usual ski pant. what are your opinions?
May 29 2006 10:56PM
0 0
profile picture
ski_cartel
Posts: 6598 - Karma: 18
i like my pans bagy
May 29 2006 10:56PM
0 0
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61110 - Karma: 118,309
Tight pants=gay.
May 29 2006 10:58PM
0 0
profile picture
Holte
Posts: 10730 - Karma: 7,744
only if:
A. You're a racer
B. You're over 50
C. You can really, really shred the BC
D. You're a superhero
May 29 2006 10:58PM
0 0
profile picture
Dkrew13
Posts: 249 - Karma: 15
whatever, I dont give a fuck, I just go ski
May 29 2006 11:00PM
0 0
profile picture
Aclique_Clothing
Posts: 1807 - Karma: 19
*cough* emo *cough* yeah tight pants suck
May 29 2006 11:02PM
0 0
profile picture
FNJ
Posts: 3026 - Karma: 110
what about
E. You're jon hartman
I think he can pull it off ok
May 29 2006 11:02PM
0 0
profile picture
skifree919
Posts: 5842 - Karma: 35
WHY DONT PEOPLE JUST WEAR PANTS THAT FIT????
May 29 2006 11:03PM
0 0
profile picture
2Ski4Life7
Posts: 56 - Karma: 15
Not EMO pants but retro pants all right like Blake Nyman in the 11th hour but maybe a little looser then that.
My reason for slightly tight panst is that if the pants are to baggy you can't move in them at all
May 29 2006 11:06PM
0 0
profile picture
Edward.
Posts: 9366 - Karma: 445
the only way you can wear tight pants is if they have neon colors
May 29 2006 11:09PM
0 0
profile picture
siversex
Posts: 1254 - Karma: 16
yeah.....no no no
May 29 2006 11:11PM
0 0
profile picture
Fashion_Geek
Posts: 157 - Karma: 53
JUST WEAR PANTS THAT FIT!!!!
May 29 2006 11:15PM
0 0
profile picture
TheWallaby
Posts: 297 - Karma: 16
everyone has a different idea of what fits...

i won't hate on tight pants, i just prefer the way larger, baggier ones look.
May 29 2006 11:18PM
0 0
profile picture
mkb311
Posts: 106 - Karma: 10
tight pants are fo dick eaters
May 29 2006 11:19PM
0 0
profile picture
2Ski4Life7
Posts: 56 - Karma: 15
well aren't we mr. positive
May 29 2006 11:22PM
0 0
profile picture
tom_nz
Posts: 321 - Karma: 10
i lik bagy pants!!!
May 29 2006 11:29PM
0 0
profile picture
CKpolicy
Posts: 2587 - Karma: 2,463
that was going to be my only criteria.
May 29 2006 11:31PM
0 0
profile picture
albatross.
Posts: 4380 - Karma: 772
heh
May 29 2006 11:36PM
0 0
profile picture
QuazBotch
Posts: 3908 - Karma: 216
pants are better then no pants when skiing. I yardsailed good while wearing shorts. It was scrape-ey
May 29 2006 11:37PM
0 0
profile picture
Itsbackfliptime
Posts: 18901 - Karma: 75
Tight pants restrict movement and arent as warm because there is less air insulating you.
May 29 2006 11:39PM
0 0
profile picture
albatross.
Posts: 4380 - Karma: 772
noope, definitley warmer haha.
May 29 2006 11:41PM
0 0
profile picture
2Ski4Life7
Posts: 56 - Karma: 15
not really cause if you were the pants where they should be worn you can do all sorts of movements and in order to stay warm you just where more under the pants like one or two pairs of long under wear
May 29 2006 11:42PM
0 0
profile picture
joshbryant
Posts: 2133 - Karma: 228
Jon Hartman wears jeans with no insulation in the backcountry, miles from any warmth. Something about freezing his emotions...
May 29 2006 11:45PM
0 0
profile picture
Ski^^bum
Posts: 189 - Karma: 26
2Ski4Life7*
22 Posts
Lame
May 29 2006
11:42:59
Quote Reply not really cause if you were the pants where they should be worn you can do all sorts of movements and in order to stay warm you just where more under the pants like one or two pairs of long under wear

Exactly. Tight pants= more layers= less movement. baggys good as long as its not fucking huge.
May 29 2006 11:49PM
0 0
profile picture
2Ski4Life7
Posts: 56 - Karma: 15
i like that thinking


do you not no were the quote reply button is
May 29 2006 11:52PM
0 0
profile picture
Ski^^bum
Posts: 189 - Karma: 26
ya my bad. I got it now thanks
May 29 2006 11:53PM
0 0
profile picture
2Ski4Life7
Posts: 56 - Karma: 15
no prob just trying to help
May 29 2006 11:56PM
0 0
profile picture
skitheslopes
Posts: 864 - Karma: 9
there are some who can rock the tight pant steeze, some who cant.
May 29 2006 11:57PM
0 0
profile picture
IHOP
Posts: 2155 - Karma: 19
From what I've seen it dosen't really look like that Hartman guy can pull it off that well either. Something about tight pants and skiing makes him look constantly flaily/sketchy, in pictures anyways.
May 29 2006 11:59PM
0 0
profile picture
Anathema
Posts: 21048 - Karma: 5,061
i like em somewhat baggy, but i dont go overboard. how comfortable can it be to have to reach back to pull them up every 3 seconds. sure it is the OMG GANGSTA thing to do.. but isn't very practical. sure you can wear a belt, but i find it still doesn't work right
May 30 2006 12:01AM
0 0
profile picture
joshbryant
Posts: 2133 - Karma: 228
He pulled it off pretty well here:

Click for larger image
May 30 2006 12:30AM
0 0
profile picture
2Ski4Life7
Posts: 56 - Karma: 15
I agree gree
May 30 2006 12:38AM
0 0
profile picture
albatross.
Posts: 4380 - Karma: 772
screw you guys, its all about new era hats celtic jerseys and oakley pants.

har har.
May 30 2006 2:59AM
0 0
profile picture
johanblaze
Posts: 4987 - Karma: 343
i sew all my pants and jackets up nice and tight.

tight pants wide stance fat skis skinny bitches!
May 30 2006 3:15AM
0 0
profile picture
therealjerk
Posts: 2806 - Karma: 26
Actually, tighter pants restrict the amount of dead (cold) airspace between your body, which creates heat, and the layer... but they do get wet, hence, you have to be a badass
May 30 2006 3:57AM
0 0
profile picture
jS.torgeRseN
Posts: 1155 - Karma: 11
baggy is way better....
May 30 2006 6:06AM
0 0
profile picture
Min_Soo
Posts: 2307 - Karma: 293
do whatever you like, i just like my pants a little baggy, not like xxl, i think baggy is just more comfy
May 30 2006 6:20AM
0 0
profile picture
-_-Johnny-_-
Posts: 480 - Karma: 39
I think the really tight pants looks weird because the boot is massive, the pants should atleast have the same diameter as the boots. However I hate baggy pants when I'm not skiing.
May 30 2006 8:34AM
0 0
profile picture
K2-fujative
Posts: 451 - Karma: 10
It can't be any better than baggy pants, wide stance fat skis cork threes =D
May 30 2006 10:04AM
0 0
profile picture
wallner_m
Posts: 181 - Karma: 44
i prefer baggy pants
May 30 2006 10:41AM
0 0
profile picture
IrideWI
Posts: 2882 - Karma: 316
baggy is where its at
May 30 2006 10:49AM
0 0
profile picture
the_zissou
Posts: 927 - Karma: 193
who cares.
May 30 2006 10:58AM
0 0
profile picture
DANETRON
Posts: 6671 - Karma: 137
i agree, but whatever just do ur o wn thing
May 30 2006 10:58AM
0 0
profile picture
asfffffffffdd
Posts: 1554 - Karma: 1,103
word
May 30 2006 10:58AM
0 0
profile picture
switchmisty
Posts: 407 - Karma: 9
wear whatever you want unless it is a skirt- that really would be gay. but plenty of people besides emo kids wear tight pants; 80s'metal gods, Hessians, Ninjas, skaters, greasers, punks and a whole assortment of aerobics teachers.
May 30 2006 12:53PM
0 0
profile picture
Fashion_Geek
Posts: 157 - Karma: 53
Most tighter pants are made out of stretch material so you can still move in them just fine. And you don't have to worry about your XXL's falling off all the time and just ski....
May 30 2006 12:59PM
0 0
profile picture
Download-My-Apps
Posts: 5069 - Karma: 1,017
i odnt really care, but i think it looks pritty cool and will be a big fad in the near future
May 30 2006 1:07PM
0 0
profile picture
r5tommy
Posts: 3608 - Karma: 89
just that jibij hartman dude can rock it well, and i have yet to see it look decent on somone else...
May 30 2006 1:09PM
0 0
profile picture
hans_aschim
Posts: 1188 - Karma: 11
'boot fit' snow pants are okay/ tight holdens in XL are acceptable but really do whatever you feel
May 30 2006 1:29PM
0 0
profile picture
lineskier12345
Posts: 14 - Karma: 10
i like seeing your stuffing
May 30 2006 1:50PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)