Finding Neverland

humm, sounds good the way you put it. my mom said it was a documentry about the guy who wrote peter pan and that sounds really shitty.

__
the next time your about to make a racial slur stop, think about all the delicious foods that come from his or her country and channel your energy towards the purchase of your next international delight.

-guttermouth

It wasn't a straight up documentary. It was very loosely based on his life. It was very good though. I got dragged to see it by my girlfriend but I thought it was extremely well done and as usual Jonny Depp is the man

yes, johnny depp is the man. i find that chick that played peter pan in the end play was... i dunno. something about her was very attractive. except she wasn't really hot... it's strange.

i love apple and lanks and skibum_ and lucyford and dfresh and d-rocket and cko and nopoles and gustle and caden and mikee and wrightgirl and missy and jessbuff and seanpistol and doc.dre and dynstrtm and schweitzerski and almostaskiier and katesd and lateralis and eastcoastpride and ekunz and *jay* and t-schill and *pinkgrinder* and J.D._May and shorty_t and jib_tech and niwanyshyn and ever_murky and nsnski240 and the rest of you are a-holes. smiles :)) :)):): ):) :)): :):):)) ):)):)

yeah man it wasn't a documentary at all. It was just based off his life. But yeah, that movie was fuckin awsome.

nornornornornornornornornornorn ornornornornornornornornornorno rnornornornornornornornornornor nornor nonornornornornornornornor nornornorno rnornornornornornor rnornornornornornornornornornor nornornornornornornornornornorn ornornornornornornornornornorno rnornornornornornornornornornor nornornornornornornornornornorn ornornornornornornornornornorno rnornornornornornornornornornor nornornornornornornornornornorn ornornornornornornornornornorno rnornornornornornornornornornor nornornornornornornornornornor

i didn't think it was amazing, very enjoyable maybe. depp is good as always (its pretty much gauranteed at this point). however, you do have to give the film credit for being one of the few thats 'heartfelt' but not nauseating (because thats pretty rare). maybe its just my taste, but i thought the aesthetic of his imagination could have been done a little better - although it does put it in a historical perspective...on second thought i think that the director was right on in his thinking that cgi shit would have just cheapened the fantasy. so props for that i suppose - way to be balsy in the age where directors rely on cgi to keep their movies up to date.

"if you stay ill totally put out." - markd13 in regards to my having had it with this site.

cgi? please explain.

nornornornornornornornornornorn ornornornornornornornornornorno rnornornornornornornornornornor nornor nonornornornornornornornor nornornorno rnornornornornornor rnornornornornornornornornornor nornornornornornornornornornorn ornornornornornornornornornorno rnornornornornornornornornornor nornornornornornornornornornorn ornornornornornornornornornorno rnornornornornornornornornornor nornornornornornornornornornorn ornornornornornornornornornorno rnornornornornornornornornornor nornornornornornornornornornor

cgi, you know computer generated imagery.

this is my analysis for those that care: if you'll ,in the film all of the stuff that showed his imagination was all very sort of 'stagey.' it felt like a really well done high school play. you'd think that in this day and age, with this much star power (depp, winslett, hoffman) and backed by a big film company (miramax) that they would have used cgi for sure. instead the director (possibly producer) made the decision to go with something that was much more natural looking. not only was this a nice change of pace from the usual cgi stuff (which unless its a film like lotr, has lost a lot of its ability to wow), but it was more relative to the historical context of the film. i think that his imagination would have been relative to the time that he lived in. this is not to say that he couldn't have imagined things to the degree that we do now, but that because of the way his imagination was represented that it made it 'fit' historically. furthermore, if he was a playwrite then his imagination would have been geared towards the stage (as it somewhat appeared in the film)... if that makes any sense.

"if you stay ill totally put out." - markd13 in regards to my having had it with this site.

cgi is a computer generated image. It's the term used to define all the special effects and computer edited scenes and graphics in much of all Hollywood movies these days.

There is also another cgi which is generally a web based computer protocol used to translate between web forms and a program. It shares alot of similarities between C / perl programming languages.


Hope that answers your question.

/////ENEMY () WITHIN\\\\\

^ hey, it's justin

i love apple, lanks, skibum_, lucyford, dfresh, d-rocket, cko, nopoles, gustle, spokaneskier, plumpwonton, melvs, caden, freeskigrl24, mikee, wrightgirl, missy, jessbuff, seanpistol, doc.dre, dynstrtm, Spyderxtra789, schweitzerski, hey_cutie, almostaskiier, katesd, lateralis, eastcoastpride, ekunz, *jay*, t-schill, *pinkgrinder*, J.D._May, shorty_t, jib_tech, niwanyshyn, ever_murky, nsnski240 and the rest of you are a-holes. smiles :)) :)):): )):): :):))): :) :))