It looks like you are using an ad blocker. That's okay. Who doesn't? But without advertising revenue, we can't keep making this site awesome. Click the link below for instructions on disabling adblock.
First the specs:
Weight-9 lbs 11 oz for the pair
Skied the Rossignol slat for the 2014-15 season. I bought it for the purpose of an all-mountain ski that I could ride in the park, powder, and in all conditions. For the most part it served its purpose well. I mounted them at the recommended mount because I wanted plenty of nose length to ski deeper snow. They can be mounted center for strictly park and groomed snow performance. First I'll compare it with a ski of the same category then I'll get to some of the technical details of the slat's performance.
Previously I had skied the Armada ARV at 185 (130/95/119mm) with 100% traditional camber and it could ski whatever I felt like with confidence. It was stable and super poppy, which made it a true all-mountain ski. The slat is in the same category, but doesn't have as much camber or sidecut. This is a good thing and a bad thing, kind of a problem you want to have in some circumstances. If you want a ski that is going ski better all over the mountain go with the ARV or the ARVti. The slat is more of a park ski that can ski elsewhere pretty good. The slat however is a much better park ski. If you like a wide park ski go with the slat, you'll have a good ass time.
Now I'd like to tell you about some cool technical aspects of the slat I really liked. First thing I noticed right off the bat is the core in the tails is periodically shaved down behind the binding giving the tail a soft buttery flex. Same with the nose, but not as prominent as the tails. So the slat is stiff underfoot, but has a nice soft flex in the tip and tail. Especially the tail, which easily presses any feature it touches. The tip and tail also have a nice gradual rocker that keeps an edge while carving, but gives you plenty of freedom if you want to spin while carving up the lip of jump. I was surprised how well these skis kept their edge in firm snow conditions. The rocker doesn't hurt their performance on hard/firm snowpack. The slat is also exceptional in slush.
My only complaint about the slat is that it didn't hold up as well as I wanted when things got steep and deep. I took it out on a couple 2'+ powder days and felt like I was really pushing the skis past what they could handle. If they were a tiny bit fatter and at a length of 188cm things would be different, but they aren't so at the end of the day the slat is a kick-ass park ski that can tear up almost the whole mountain. I plan on keeping my slat's for another year so if you're thinking about buying them you're not making a bad choice.