Replying to Frankenski vs magnus 102
As someone who has ridden neither, the Frankenski looks more attractive on surface level even with the similarities. Bamboo core, durasurf bases, square ass tips, hell the frankenski even has carbon stringers and that super proprietary triple camber and normally costs $100 less than a magnus 102.
My question is, why would you buy a magnus 102 over the frankenski, unless the huge rocker, bigger width and on3p hype accounts for the extra cost? (or do they just ski a lot more differently than I think they do?) Anton linden makes them look like they ride similar to on3p at least. Anyone who's ridden both able to provide some input?
Click to expand post