Line Sick Day 104

I have a pair and depending on what you are used to they may be too light for you, what do you like to ride/ride right now OP?

You should checkout the Blister review, they do a really good job of describing the ski and how it will ride. https://blisterreview.com/gear-reviews/2017-2018-line-sick-day-104

I have a pair of the 186's and have ridden them around a dozen times with Pivot 14s mounted at the recommended point. I think the Blister review is pretty spot on. They're fun in anything soft but as the snow gets cruddy/chunkier they get knocked around some. Lots of fun in the spring, they carve well and are very surfy and fun in fresh snow, even if its low angle. They're pretty comfortable skiing relatively fast, especially if its on soft or smooth snow, but not a charging ski as they get tossed around and don't want to plow through crud as much as a stiffer, heavier ski. If you don't need a full twin tip and don't want them as an aggressive charging ski I think they're a great all-mountain option. I'm really tempted to put AT bindings on mine at some point, I'm sure they would be a pretty good touring ski since they're light and easy/fun to ski in most conditions.

**This post was edited on Mar 14th 2021 at 5:54:49pm

what is a recommended mount point on 104? Line's site says -7,2cm from true center, blister review describes as -10,1 from true center. WHICH IS CORRECT?!

The rec on mine is -10cm

severniywhat is a recommended mount point on 104? Line's site says -7,2cm from true center, blister review describes as -10,1 from true center. WHICH IS CORRECT?!

LazylightningThe rec on mine is -10cm

Thanx.

I think blister is referring to the fact that they pushed the mount point up +3cm from recommended and still liked it

severniyThanx.

I confused myself....I don't think stance is synonymous with mount point

LazylightningI think blister is referring to the fact that they pushed the mount point up +3cm from recommended and still liked it