It looks like you are using an ad blocker. That's okay. Who doesn't? But without advertising revenue, we can't keep making this site awesome. Click the link below for instructions on disabling adblock.
Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
TRVP_ANGELthe consequence of setting your din at 21 is the perfect exanple of when keeping it real goes wrong
You see, if she had a non ejecting binding, she could have had more elasticity without the need to release. Truly shameful that manufacturers are this far behind the times.
These days, a boot only moves a centimeter or two before releasing from the ski. A binding without the need to eject could have let the boot rotate as much as necessary, allowing a lower binding spring setting. A true non ejecting binding could have mitigated the crash in the first place.
jompcockYou see, if she had a non ejecting binding, she could have had more elasticity without the need to release. Truly shameful that manufacturers are this far behind the times.
These days, a boot only moves a centimeter or two before releasing from the ski. A binding without the need to eject could have let the boot rotate as much as necessary, allowing a lower binding spring setting. A true non ejecting binding could have mitigated the crash in the first place.
BradFiAusNzCoCaI can’t tell if this is sarcasm or legit
Nothing exists on the market as of now, but industry insiders have leaked through the grapevine talk of a binding that can provide multidirectional elasticity without the need for the skier to be separated from the ski. Though the earliest rumors of such a binding date to around 2016, stringent testing is required for such a binding to be certified for use with any boot on the market today.
Furthermore, we may see a total shift in boot sole design in order to reduce unnecessary shell stack height and create optimal compatibility with a non ejecting binding. Such a change in boot design may add on to time required for testing of boot compatibility. We may see non ejecting binding on the market for ISO 5355 and 9523 boots as early as 2023, and lighter weight touring versions within the next 8 years. I hope my knees can tolerate the rudimentary bindings of today until a truly elastic binding is released for safe consumer use. Early editions may be on the more expensive, as are all first editions of state of the art technology.
jompcockNothing exists on the market as of now, but industry insiders have leaked through the grapevine talk of a binding that can provide multidirectional elasticity without the need for the skier to be separated from the ski. Though the earliest rumors of such a binding date to around 2016, stringent testing is required for such a binding to be certified for use with any boot on the market today.
Furthermore, we may see a total shift in boot sole design in order to reduce unnecessary shell stack height and create optimal compatibility with a non ejecting binding. Such a change in boot design may add on to time required for testing of boot compatibility. We may see non ejecting binding on the market for ISO 5355 and 9523 boots as early as 2023, and lighter weight touring versions within the next 8 years. I hope my knees can tolerate the rudimentary bindings of today until a truly elastic binding is released for safe consumer use. Early editions may be on the more expensive, as are all first editions of state of the art technology.
Never used a knee binding. Something as rudimentary as the knee binding pales in comparison to a non ejecting binding. Entirely different release design, built from the ground up. Think outside the box.
jompcockNever used a knee binding. Something as rudimentary as the knee binding pales in comparison to a non ejecting binding. Entirely different release design, built from the ground up. Think outside the box.
PoikenzFIS should allow competitors to use ski tip connectors
They need remote controlled binding ejectors, maybe the coach can have his finger on the button so when they fall the skis can be released cause if that fall doesn't make the bindings release then what will?
Ive thought of this as well, like some button on your glove but accidental release would be an issue. Also the pranks you could play just by pushing someone else's button
a_pla5tic_bagThey need remote controlled binding ejectors, maybe the coach can have his finger on the button so when they fall the skis can be released cause if that fall doesn't make the bindings release then what will?
