Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post.
Register to become a member today!
Enforcer 104 vs Ranger 102 Fr
Blister seems pretty high on both these skis, I’ve got a wider pair of wildcats and got a pair of the enforcers but am having second thoughts on whether the Ranger 102 would’ve been better for carving and on harder snow (being my narrowest ski), as well as in the park.
any reports from people who’ve skied either?
Live on the East and have 10 days on the Ranger 102fr this season. Hands down the best ski I’ve been on in years. I have the 191 so it’s a lot of ski, but I can drive em so hard on ice and groomers with ease. They’re low key really poppy off side hits and rollers. Can make any turn, flick em super quick, trees/bumps whatever. Everything I wanted in a sub 110 ski to round my quiver. I have skied the enforcers but I believe the Fischer’s are stiffer vs. the enforcers. Which I wanted.
Both fantastic skis and above mentioned, the Fisher 102 FR is a bit stiffer and lighter and the Enforcer 104 is a bit softer and heavier. The Fisher 102 FR is more precise and lighter on it’s feet, the E104 is a more forgiving ski that hauls still because of it’s heavier weight. Fisher is a better carver on piste, the Enforcer more forgiving in bumps.
I could happily live with either.
Ditto to everything above. Only thing I'd add is that I'd personally prefer the 102 FR for park since it feels notably lighter in the air. Both are awesome, pretty stable all-mountain skis that are also pretty playful.
All times are Eastern (-5)