Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Candide 2.0 Sizing

profile picture
ngates_EC
Posts: 1464 - Karma: 807
Thinking about getting the Candide 2.0

5'8", 150lbs, advanced skier looking to ski 60/40 park vs. groomers and trees in the East.

Do I want a 172 or a 178?
POLL
Edit Poll
Votes:

Take care when editing a poll; Options should be similar to maintain vote integrity.

More options will be added automatically as you type. You must supply a question and at least two options. No HTML is allowed.

Nov 22 2016 1:07PM
2 0
profile picture
ngates_EC
Posts: 1464 - Karma: 807
I meant to say 60/40 groomers vs. park. Spending a little more time around the mountain
Nov 22 2016 1:10PM
0 0
profile picture
ngates_EC
Posts: 1464 - Karma: 807
So who has skied these? Can they rip the entire mountain like everyone claims?
Nov 25 2016 6:29PM
0 0
profile picture
Aparker
Posts: 727 - Karma: 1,674
It doesnt matter just always get the bigger size. If you dont like them you can return them or sell or trade
Nov 25 2016 6:38PM
0 0
profile picture
Willows
Posts: 442 - Karma: 2,624
It's a life changing ski... Rips everywhere and yes go for the longer length 178!
Nov 27 2016 5:27PM
0 0
profile picture
tallteesteeze
Posts: 158 - Karma: 55
I also ordered a pair but in 184cm. I know the 2.0 is a symmetrical ski (135-102-135) but I'm wondering where ya'll would recommend I mount them.

I'd estimate I'll be using them for about 65% park 35% All mountain/pow.

I have a pair of k2 obsetheds from a few years back that's a 105 underfoot, but not sure I'll want to carry those around in addition to the candids when I'm travelling for the rare chance of a pow day.

Suggestions?
Nov 27 2016 8:07PM
0 0
profile picture
Willows
Posts: 442 - Karma: 2,624
tallteesteezeI also ordered a pair but in 184cm. I know the 2.0 is a symmetrical ski (135-102-135) but I'm wondering where ya'll would recommend I mount them.

I'd estimate I'll be using them for about 65% park 35% All mountain/pow.

I have a pair of k2 obsetheds from a few years back that's a 105 underfoot, but not sure I'll want to carry those around in addition to the candids when I'm travelling for the rare chance of a pow day.

Suggestions?


mount after the recommended -2cm from dead. You don't really notice in the park, but it just makes them that little bit more at home when skiing the whole mountain
Nov 28 2016 10:41AM
0 0
profile picture
ngates_EC
Posts: 1464 - Karma: 807
Faction recommends skiing your height. First time I've heard that I shouldn't size up. Any thoughts?
Nov 30 2016 2:21PM
0 0
profile picture
Wrangler307
Posts: 11 - Karma: 17
I'm 5'9, 170 lbs, and I spend about the same time around the mountain and in the park, which is steamboat. This will be my second season with the 2.0 in the 178 size and i love it. It handles any type of riding I feel like that day, even does pretty well in a good amount of deep snow. I would go with the longer ski. Whenever you pick them up you won't regret the purchase
Nov 30 2016 2:28PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)