Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Thoughts on K2 102 Shreditors?

profile picture
T-T
Posts: 96 - Karma: 996
Worth the money?
Sep 27 2016 1:38PM
1 0
profile picture
SammyDubz
Posts: 2168 - Karma: 7,217
fun ski if you like noodles
Sep 27 2016 5:20PM
0 0
profile picture
ICary
Posts: 322 - Karma: 777
Love them, but they are soft. Soft in the tip and tail and have a decent amount of rocker. Still stable though. Spent the entire summer on them too and they took the test and didn't have any major issues. Plus low-key the graphic from last year was amazing! Blend is a similar too. Overall fun ski to butter and just a ski that is fun to ride.
Sep 28 2016 10:15AM
0 0
profile picture
T-T
Posts: 96 - Karma: 996
ICaryLove them, but they are soft. Soft in the tip and tail and have a decent amount of rocker. Still stable though. Spent the entire summer on them too and they took the test and didn't have any major issues. Plus low-key the graphic from last year was amazing! Blend is a similar too. Overall fun ski to butter and just a ski that is fun to ride.


Good in the park?
Sep 29 2016 12:55PM
0 0
profile picture
ICary
Posts: 322 - Karma: 777
T-TGood in the park?


Didn't blow up on me, or ever take any serious damage from usual summer riding, I loved how easy it was to butter, I think that is what made the ski so fun. Still ok pop, I feel like the pop now a days is so similar and more the skier than the skis so.
Sep 29 2016 2:02PM
0 0
profile picture
.squirrely.
Posts: 7563 - Karma: 7,540
T-TGood in the park?


Got them towards the end of last season and skied like a month on them, mostly park, and I loved them. Way softer than I thought but I have them in 189 so they're long enough to still be pretty stable at most park speeds, but they carve really well on groomers too. Would highly recommend them if you're looking for a soft midfat park ski
Sep 29 2016 2:02PM
0 0
profile picture
T-T
Posts: 96 - Karma: 996
.squirrely.Got them towards the end of last season and skied like a month on them, mostly park, and I loved them. Way softer than I thought but I have them in 189 so they're long enough to still be pretty stable at most park speeds, but they carve really well on groomers too. Would highly recommend them if you're looking for a soft midfat park ski


im 5'11, 170's to short?
Sep 29 2016 2:36PM
0 0
profile picture
tomPietrowski
Posts: 7097 - Karma: 17,017
T-Tim 5'11, 170's to short?


yeah you want the 177 at least. Im the same height and had them in 184 and they were great fun. Used them as my main ski last year for everything from backcountry to park. Super fun ski. Certainly soft in the tip and tail but with some good stiffness underfoot so they are not too soft. If you were looking for a ski for mostly park though, check out the new poacher. They are so good in the park and all mnt allthough not as good in pow as the 102's if that matters to you.
Sep 29 2016 3:02PM
0 0
profile picture
T-T
Posts: 96 - Karma: 996
tomPietrowskiyeah you want the 177 at least. Im the same height and had them in 184 and they were great fun. Used them as my main ski last year for everything from backcountry to park. Super fun ski. Certainly soft in the tip and tail but with some good stiffness underfoot so they are not too soft. If you were looking for a ski for mostly park though, check out the new poacher. They are so good in the park and all mnt allthough not as good in pow as the 102's if that matters to you.


word thanks dude
Sep 29 2016 4:50PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)