And what the fuck does bush care about the enviorment?
He'll die of old age in 30 years regardless, he doesn't give a flying fuck,
and his theory is probably that the rich people can afford sunblock...
fuck em...
(what i meant is He ISN"T going To live long enough to watch
his political blunders fuck up the entire world,
Bush really could be a world leader and example forceing India, and china
to modernies (Sp? and reduce there oncoming industrail growth
The world is fucked, come to think of it...
we haven't even hit the 2% carbon dioxiced levels in the air yet,
and look how fucked our weather parterns are getting,
and isn't there another HURRiCane Hitting florida as we speak?
Yeah Global warming is a hoax kids...
Watch these movies...
http://www.thememoryhole.org/pol/bush-hitler-ads.htm
Five less developed nations tackle Bush on Kyoto
By Fiona Harvey and Caroline Daniel in Gleneagles
Published: July 8 2005 03:00 | Last updated: July 8 2005 03:00
The developing nations attending the summit of the Group of Eight leading economies sent a strong rebuff to the US on climate change yesterday.
They strongly endorsed the Kyoto protocol on climate change, which the US has rejected, and called on developed nations to reduce their emissions of greenhouse gases, in a joint statement ahead of the G8's expected communiqué on climate change.
China, India, Brazil, Mexico and South Africa noted that climate change had and would have "a profound impact on the development prospects of our societies".
Referring to the Kyoto protocol, which requires developed countries to cut their greenhouse gas emissions, they said: "Developed countries should therefore take the lead in international action to combat climate change by fully implementing their obligations of reducing emissions."
This was clear criticism of the US, which has strongly opposed the inclusion of any mandatory emissions reduction targets in the text of the G8 communiqué.
Friends of the Earth, the environmental non-governmental organisation, welcomed the five nations' statement as "extremely positive".
A spokeswoman said: "This holds confidence in Kyoto. They are clearly asking [G8 countries] for cuts in emissions and for defined targets and the G8 countries can't afford not to listen."
However, the five developing countries did not pledge to reduce their own emissions, invoking the terms of the Kyoto treaty that said developed nations were in a stronger position to make emissions cuts.
Instead, they called for more money to help them adopt sustainable energy technologies, such as solar and wind power, that would reduce their reliance on fossil fuels, and money to help them adapt to the effects of climate change, such as drought and flood, which they said were borne mainly by the poor.
The call echoed a hint by Gordon Brown, the chancellor of the exchequer, that the World Bank would provide more financing for clean energy projects in the developing world, in addition to the assist-ance in setting up such projects it already provides under the Kyoto protocol.
Their appeal for technology also reflects the position of President George W. Bush.
The president has emphasised the need to seek new technology to lower emissions in the future in preference to taking any steps to cut emissions now.
Earlier in the morning Mr Bush appeared to strike a conciliatory note, holding out hope that the US might agree to a statement endorsing the scientific basis for climate change, as other G8 leaders want. Referring to a speech on climate change he made in 2001, Mr Bush said: "If you look at the speech, I recognised that greenhouse gases were an issue and that we must deal with it.
"I said that based upon scientific evidence, the goal of the United States is to neutralise and then reduce emissions of greenhouse gases over time.
"And so my position has been pretty steady."
However, though Mr Bush's 2001 speech conceded that the earth was warming, it emphasised the uncertainty in scientific research, particularly on what constituted a dangerous level of warming.
The speech made clear a preference for developing new technology to deal with climate change rather than adopting targets for emissions reduction.
live by the N.E.R.D 
