ski length AND rails

not the sliding part , but the lightness and short spin factor doesnt hurt.



member#13687



'i just rented good will hunting , how is it?'

'lets put it this way, even matt damon cant make it suck.'

'matt damon? hes in con air right?'

'yes , yes he is.'

and where they are mounted> how balanced they are



i looked on google but all i could find was 3D Animation porn-sxmarty6



ECS headwear, hit me up!

i reckon if they are centre mounted it helps
See, there's three kinds of people: dicks, pussies, and assholes. Pussies think everyone can get along, and dicks just want to fuck all the time without thinking it through. But then you got your assholes, Chuck. And all the assholes want us to shit all over everything! So, pussies may get mad at dicks once in a while because pussies get fucked by dicks. But dicks also fuck assholes, Chuck. And if they didn't fuck the assholes, you know what you'd get? You'd get your dick and your pussy all covered in shit!

I've found that my almost center mounted 168 scratch FS's are easir to grease rails on. I'm a fan of shorter wide skis for rails. Makes sense if you think about it.



_______________________________________

Making skiing preppy again since 1999.

ive gone straight from smaller 1260's to old 180cm straight skis circa 1990 on rails and i hardly noticed a diff at all. for spinning and doing switchups, shorter and closer to centermounted is obviously easier tho
_____________________________________

oh yeah? well me and my friends have been bathing off the southern coast of st. bards, chilling with spider monkeys. tripping on acid gave us a whole new perspective on shit.

i think i have more balance








311 is the Fuckin Shit Mutha Fucka

doesnt really matter... its only a few centemetres difference... you may notice a bit... its mmore where your bindings are mounted on the skibut yea...obviously you will be alot better on rail if you have a 180 than a 130
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~

When your not sure about something, just HUCK IT!