Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Devastator reviews//vs kartel 98

profile picture
TheDetectives
Posts: 634 - Karma: 1,472
i was thinking of getting a ski around 100, at the waist but im leaning towards something even more versetile. i at first thought the kartel 98 then after seeing Pete Arneson's self edit v2 (http://vimeo.com/101362850) noticed he was riding the devistators and i looked into them, saw that they had full rocker, and i loved the full rocker on my volkl bridges so i thought these would be a great option
POLL
Edit Poll
Votes:

Take care when editing a poll; Options should be similar to maintain vote integrity.

More options will be added automatically as you type. You must supply a question and at least two options. No HTML is allowed.

Jul 26 2014 12:23AM
48 6
profile picture
TheDetectives
Posts: 634 - Karma: 1,472
my computer is trippinnnn
Jul 26 2014 12:27AM
1 0
profile picture
profa_212
Posts: 8620 - Karma: 32,325
Why are you comparing them to the 98? Why not the 106?
Jul 26 2014 12:35AM
2 0
profile picture
TheDetectives
Posts: 634 - Karma: 1,472
Profahoben_212Why are you comparing them to the 98? Why not the 106?


i wasnt thinking of going over 100 at the waist untill i looked into the devistators
Jul 26 2014 12:48AM
1 0
profile picture
TheDetectives
Posts: 634 - Karma: 1,472
The referenced post has been removed.


everything, park, pow, all mtn
Jul 26 2014 1:02AM
1 0
profile picture
shin-bang
Posts: 4100 - Karma: 6,992
well the kartel will feel more poppy, because it has camber.
Jul 26 2014 1:05AM
3 0
profile picture
TheDetectives
Posts: 634 - Karma: 1,472
i really liked my bridges so i think id be fine
Jul 26 2014 1:34AM
1 1
profile picture
TheDetectives
Posts: 634 - Karma: 1,472
_J.T.well the kartel will feel more poppy, because it has camber.


TheDetectivesi really liked my bridges so i think id be fine


this was a reply to you,,,,,,,,and if anyone who has used the devistators in park could gimmie a little review
Jul 26 2014 1:36AM
1 0
profile picture
profa_212
Posts: 8620 - Karma: 32,325
The referenced post has been removed.


Actually because their rocker is the exact same as the sidecut, the edge will contact the snow all the way up the ski when put on edge. Meaning the Devastators will actually grab the snow almost as well as a full camber ski, and why they are such a versatile ski.
Jul 26 2014 1:47AM
2 1
profile picture
LOLZfajitas
Posts: 393 - Karma: 1,054
i don't really like their shape, i've always been a even tip and tail height kinda guy
Jul 26 2014 5:20AM
2 1
profile picture
TheDetectives
Posts: 634 - Karma: 1,472
LOLZfajitasi don't really like their shape, i've always been a even tip and tail height kinda guy


most all mtn skis are like that, even the symetrical candide 2.0 doesnt have the same amount of rocker in the tip and tail
Jul 26 2014 10:51AM
1 0
profile picture
LOLZfajitas
Posts: 393 - Karma: 1,054
TheDetectivesmost all mtn skis are like that, even the symetrical candide 2.0 doesnt have the same amount of rocker in the tip and tail


yeah, i guess, but im just saying, it looks kinda eh, i was just throwin it out there
Jul 26 2014 12:26PM
1 1
profile picture
RudyGarmisch
Posts: 25443 - Karma: 13,845
Materials used in construction would also be something to consider, as those lend a fair amount to the performance and are somewhat different.
Jul 26 2014 1:04PM
2 0
profile picture
shin-bang
Posts: 4100 - Karma: 6,992
i personally havent ridding the devys, but ive heard first hand that they rip grooms too because of the reflect tech design. ive never riddin a fully rockered ski in the park so i dont know how they will do in that aspect, but i have seen people use them in the park. i would say that this ski would be perfect for you, but idk about the park
Jul 26 2014 1:46PM
1 0
profile picture
VANULAR
Posts: 1930 - Karma: 5,131
Faction Soma
Jul 26 2014 2:48PM
1 0
profile picture
Twig
Posts: 6335 - Karma: 57,038
VANULARFaction Soma


Faction 2.0
Jul 26 2014 4:42PM
2 0
profile picture
powderwhore92
Posts: 119 - Karma: 24
I got to demo the Kartel 106 for a few runs this year and it is a fucking awesome ski. Beefy, damp, poppy, amazing through crud and floaty enough in soft. If I had the money for them I would buy them without hesitation.
Jul 27 2014 12:03AM
1 0
profile picture
cobra_commander
Posts: 16909 - Karma: 4,682
so a edit of a guy sponsored by 4FRNT, made you think about buying 4FRNT skis?

rounds on target, 4frnt, well done.
Jul 27 2014 8:45AM
7 0
profile picture
TheDetectives
Posts: 634 - Karma: 1,472
cobra_commanderso a edit of a guy sponsored by 4FRNT, made you think about buying 4FRNT skis?

rounds on target, 4frnt, well done.



well it made me look into them, and theyre tight,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,also still waiting on that review, anyone?
Jul 27 2014 10:43PM
1 0
profile picture
BskiP
Posts: 1369 - Karma: 223
I'm also totally biased towards 4FRNT due to being an employee, but I can say that 90 percent of my season last year was spent on devastators. I don't really need anything else. Park laps, pow laps, jumps, groomers, you name it. The ski has some pop due to the reflect tech, I never ever felt like this ski was dead. If you liked the Turbo before, its like that except for wayyy more playful with a pretty killer ability to charge.
Jul 28 2014 5:15PM
1 1
profile picture
lil_cote_93
Posts: 50 - Karma: 16
Are the devastators too heavy though?
Oct 16 2014 3:28PM
0 0
profile picture
Scotty_Boy
Posts: 777 - Karma: 1,449
lil_cote_93Are the devastators too heavy though?


Light skis are for the weak.
Oct 16 2014 10:26PM
4 0
profile picture
TheWakes.
Posts: 685 - Karma: 235
both are good choices. devastator vs cartel 106 is a more accurate comparison. u would be happy with either.
Oct 16 2014 11:59PM
0 0
profile picture
ghosthop
Posts: 631 - Karma: 1,027
Thought the devastators gripped just fine. +1 on all the comments saying they rip, the skis are aptly named. Its an all metal ski, would not be my first choice in the park, especially if I was going to session a rail all afternoon.
Oct 17 2014 2:45AM
0 0
profile picture
BskiP
Posts: 1369 - Karma: 223
ghosthopThought the devastators gripped just fine. +1 on all the comments saying they rip, the skis are aptly named. Its an all metal ski, would not be my first choice in the park, especially if I was going to session a rail all afternoon.


There is zero metal in the devastator
Nov 7 2014 8:06AM
1 0
profile picture
Scotty_Boy
Posts: 777 - Karma: 1,449
Profahoben_212Actually because their rocker is the exact same as the sidecut, the edge will contact the snow all the way up the ski when put on edge. Meaning the Devastators will actually grab the snow almost as well as a full camber ski, and why they are such a versatile ski.


4FRNT is so creative with their shapes, I've never heard of a ski like that before. Sounds dope.
Nov 7 2014 12:55PM
0 0
profile picture
.lencon
Posts: 6753 - Karma: 17,178
Scotty_Boy4FRNT is so creative with their shapes, I've never heard of a ski like that before. Sounds dope.


Volkl did the same thing, they just don't call it reflect tech. I'm not sure who came up with the idea first tho.
Nov 7 2014 2:01PM
0 0
profile picture
p.arneson
Posts: 165 - Karma: 1,275
Devastators all the way
Nov 10 2014 3:25PM
1 0
All times are Eastern (-4)