On August 21st 2013, chemical weapons were utilized yet again in the Syrian conflict.
Particularly, the US and France did not waver for a moment to take advantage of this terrible
tragedy, calling it, ‘A Crime Against Humanity’ as well as urging forceful action upon
ostensible findings. All in using it as a catalyst to announce preparation for military strikes
against the Syrian Government.
The United States has had Syria and Iran in its crosshairs for quite some time. Four Star
General Wesley Clark states, “I talked to one of the Generals in the Joint staff, he showed me a
memo that describes on how we are going to take out seven countries in five years. Starting
with Iraq, then Syria, then Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and finishing off with Iran.” The US
government does not like to present their wars as empire building but instead paints
themselves as defenders of democracy. They are willing to flat out lie and kill thousands of
people just to advance their political objectives. For example, during the Iraq War they tried
accusing Saddam Hussein with still harboring the chemical weapons that the US provided him
in his War against Iran. Thirty or so years ago, the US was trying to take out the Iranians
because they did not like the fact that their marionette ‘The Shah’ had been ousted in 1979. As
Wesley Clark pointed out the endgame is still and always will be Iran.
The US government tried to go after Iran directly by accusing them of building nuclear
weapons. However, this pitiful propaganda decked itself, when elements within the CIA and
Mossad came forward stating that there was no evidence that Iran intended on even building
nuclear weapons. Thus, they switched their strategy and went after Syria to expose Iran.
Aforementioned, Syria and Iran have a Mutual defense agreement; hence if in fact NATO forces
enter Syria Iran will be drawn into the fight.
The US and NATO have been running a proxy war by arming and funding the FSA. Funneling
these resources through their allies in the region. To obscure the source of this support, Qatar
has been used to purchase the weapons from countries like Sudan and route them to Syria via
Turkey. Qatar is a close military ally of the US; they provided tank support in the Gulf War of
1991 and Qatar also served as the US Central Command Headquarters during the US invasion
of Iraq in 2003.
January of 2013, it was reveled that emails and a large quantity of sensitive documents from
Britam Defense, a UK based military contractor, were leaked by a hacker. These documents
exposed a proposal coming from Qatar to launch false flag chemical weapons attacks in Syria
and to blame it on the Syrian Government. According to the documents the plan had the full
support of Washington and enormous sums of money had been offered for the project. David
Goulding, the managing director of Britam was the person sending these emails. The recipient
was Phillip Doughty, dynamic director and founder of Brtiam Defense. The hacker was able to
obtain the scans of Doughty’s passports, resume as well as the passports of the Ukrainian
operatives that the email suggested should be used to carry out the attack. The documents
also revealed details regarding a contract with Saudi Arabia to help prepare their forces for a
War with Iran. The mainstream media never mentioned the hacked documents and what was
being discussed here was clearly a war crime. “Verify via linked documents.”
Three months later, March 19th sarin gas was used in Aleppo, Syria. Israel and the US blamed
the Syrian government for the attack, even though many of those killed were Syrian
government soldiers. Obama then began talking about the event as a ‘red line’ that had been
crossed. However, the UN investigated the issue and on May 6th 2013 UN investigator Carla
Del Ponte went public, stating that it was in fact the Syrian rebels that utilized sarin gas and
that there was no sign that the Syrian government launched any chemical attacks whatsoever.
Russian’s US ambassador Vitaly Churkin agreed with Del Ponte after Russian experts visited
the location and took their own samples. Those samples were then analyzed in a Russian
laboratory certified by the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. According to
the lab results, they discovered that the presence of Hexogen utilized as an opening charge
and which is not used in standard chemical emissions pointed to the attack being launched by
the Syrian rebels. Rather than cover-up this development, the main stream media simply
changed the subject.
Following this event, the US increased their support significantly. In July, the US openly began
discussing kinetic strikes against Syria as if their lies hadn’t been exposed. Shortly after, on
August 21st 2013 the US attempted once again to frame the Syrian government. Initially, the
media coverage tried to pin the attack on the Syrian government and the US and France
instantly came out condemning Assad. By August 24th the Pentagon already announced plans
for missile strikes. That very day the Syrian army came forward with footage to back up their
report that they uncovered a massive chemical weapons stash in Rebel tunnels in the
Damascus suburbs of Jawbar. This is the exact neighborhood of where the chemical weapon
attack took place.
Evidence, on May 31st 2013 Turkey finds a 2kg cylinder filled with sarin gas in homes of Syrian
On July 7th the Syrian army went public regarding a chemical lab that they found belonging to
the Syrian rebels outside the city of Damascus. In addition, the documents showing that the US
was backing a plan to frame the Syrian government.
What is the motive? The only parties that benefit from the ensuing attack are the Syrian rebels,
the US and its allies. The Syrian government knows full well that NATO and the US have been
looking for any accuse to invade. The rebels on the other hand have already been caught
committing ruthless killings as well as creating fake videos of civilian casualties. Two days
after the attack, the Syrian rebels release a video statement vowing to strike back with any and
all means. They claimed to have access to chemical weapons and they stated that they now
intended to use them with zero misgivings from this point forward. Basically, they are using
their own crime for a pretext to openly utilize chemical weapons in battle.
Russia and china have both openly sided with Syria and Iran. Russia has also warned that a
thermonuclear war could occur if in fact the US continues down its path. If the US invades a lot
of civilians will die. Their situation is not going to be enhanced by the US attacking, anymore
than it was in Iraq.
Leaked Britam Defense Documents-
The bombings in Syria conducted by Israel are actually indirect attacks on Iran. Syria and Iran
are bound by a mutual defense pact and are strategic alliances. The US and Israel's senate
resolution 65, surely to pass states that congress reaffirms the long-standing bonds of
friendship and cooperation between the United States and Israel, supports the full
implementation of U.S. and international sanctions on Iran, recognizes the tremendous threat
posed to the United States, the West, and Israel by Iran's pursuit of a nuclear weapons
capability, yet they haven't even decided to create a nuclear warhead as stated by the CIA. It
also urges that if Israel is compelled to take military action in self-defense against Iran's
nuclear weapons program the U.S. government should provide Israel with diplomatic, military,
and economic support. Thus, the foreign relations committee voting to endorse resolution 65,
(April 17, 2013) is the latchkey should Israel attack Iran. By now, people should know Israel
has openly indicated its desire to use military force on Iran. Formerly, on January 30th of this
year the US government stated that the Syrian government was using chemical weapons
against its own people. However, findings via Del Ponte state that it in fact was the Syrian
rebels that used chemical weapons. Thus, mysteriously, the Obama Administration backed
down from previous claims. I believe this was done to create the ostensible reason for military
involvement. To back these claims, documents from a UK base defense contractor revealed
that a plan by Qatari was to have the firm provide false evidence that Syria would give the go
ahead to use chemical weapons in said country. According to these documents, this plan had
full proof from the US government. Hence, NATO possibly facilitated the use of chemical
weapons. Iran-backed Hezbollah weapons were said to be the target according to Israel. The
real motive however, was to derail Syria’s progress in their fight against foreign militants
originally from Lebanon. Hezbollah who sides with president Assad’s regime, says that it was a
war against foreign backed terrorists. Iran has sent over 4,000 troops to aid Assad and RUssia
s-300, have responded to take Syria's side as well as China. Hence, NATO is backing up these
rebels despite carnages and the use of chemical weapons. This is all about how Iran has one of
the largest oil reserves; in addition they are not cooperating with the US. The USA's excuse to
invade Syria is the excuse to draw Iran into an exposed conflict. The benefits using a figure
head is that they are completely disposable. The Egyptian Revolution ties into what is going on
in Syria. IMF/world bank loans, US backs this fully and ElBaradei urges consensus to win IMF.
Suez Canal is a wanted geological feature (75% of worlds sea-trade.) Understand that the
leaders of Egypt are puppets and when a puppet such as Mubarak does not send troops to Iraq
during the 2003 invasion and rejects the joining of US Nuclear Umbrella the US will covertly
fund opposition groups to take him out of office. Egypt at the time was the second largest
power under foreign aid. THe leaders are puppets, Egypt's military should be reinvented in the
case that they have the right to pick their leader.
Huh...What happened in January?