The bombings in Syria conducted by Israel are actually indirect attacks on Iran. Syria and Iran
are bound by a mutual defense treaty and are strategic alliances. The US and Israel's senate
resolution 65, surely to pass states that congress reaffirms the long-standing bonds of
friendship and cooperation between the United States and Israel, supports the full
implementation of U.S. and international sanctions on Iran, recognizes the tremendous threat
posed to the United States, the West, and Israel by Iran's pursuit of a nuclear weapons
capability, yet they haven't even decided to create a nuclear warhead as stated by the CIA. It
also urges that if Israel is compelled to take military action in self-defense against Iran's
nuclear weapons program the U.S. government should provide Israel with diplomatic, military,
and economic support. Thus, the foreign relations committee voting to endorse resolution 65,
(April 17, 2013) is the latchkey should Israel attack Iran. By now, people should know Israel
has openly indicated its desire to use military force on Iran. Formerly, on January 30th of this
year the US government stated that the Syrian government was using chemical weapons
against its own people. However, findings via Del Ponte state that it in fact was the Syrian
rebels that used chemical weapons. Thus, mysteriously, the Obama Administration backed
down from previous claims. I believe this was done to create the ostensible reason for military
involvement. To back these claims, documents from a UK base defense contractor revealed
that a plan by Qatari was to have the firm provide false evidence that Syria would give the go
ahead to use chemical weapons in said country. According to these documents, this plan had
full proof from the US government. Hence, NATO possibly facilitated the use of chemical
weapons. Iran-backed Hezbollah weapons were said to be the target according to Israel. The
real motive however, was to derail Syria’s progress in their fight against foreign militants
originally from Lebanon. Hezbollah who sides with president Assad’s regime, says that it was a
war against foreign backed terrorists. Iran has sent over 4,000 troops to aid Assad and RUssia
s-300, have responded to take Syria's side as well as China. Hence, NATO is backing up these
rebels despite carnages and the use of chemical weapons. This is all about how Iran has one of
the largest oil reserves; in addition they are not cooperating with the US. The USA's excuse to
invade Syria is the excuse to draw Iran into an exposed conflict. The benefits using a figure
head is that they are completely disposable. The Egyptian Revolution ties into what is going on
in Syria. IMF/world bank loans, US backs this fully and ElBaradei urges consensus to win IMF.
Suez Canal is a wanted geological feature (75% of worlds sea-trade and oil) Understand that
the leaders of Egypt are puppets and when a puppet such as Mubarak does not send troops to
Iraq during the 2003 invasion and rejects the joining of US Nuclear Umbrella the US will
covertly fund opposition groups to take him out of office. Egypt at the time was the second
largest power under foreign aid. THe leaders are puppets, Egypt's military should be
reinvented in the case that they have the right to pick their leader.
Here are my sources-
http://beta.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/senate-resolution/65
http://www.presstv.com/detail/2013/01/30/286331/ukqatari-plot-against-syria-revealed/
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/05/17/us-g8-russia-idUSBRE84G18M20120517
http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/05/01/17997650-iran-backed-hezbollah-warns-it-may-intervene-in-syria-war?lite
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/05/us-syria-crisis-blasts-idUSBRE94400020130505
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-22424188
http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/ene_oil_res-energy-oil-reserves
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/05/world/middleeast/israel-syria.html?_r=1&
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/04/24/us-syria-crisis-usa-sarin-idUSBRE93N01W20130424
http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/barak-nuclear-iran-far-more-dangerous-than-preemptive-israeli-strike-1.453645
http://www.euronews.com/2013/07/10/russia-claims-evidence-of-chemical-weapons-use-by-syrian-rebels/
Huh...What happened in January?
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-202_162-57575054/syria-rebels-regime-blame-each-other-for-first-alleged-chemical-weapons-attack/
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/04/24/usa-egypt-imf-idUSL2N0DB13M20130424
http://uk.reuters.com/article/2013/02/12/uk-egypt-elbaradei-economy-idUKBRE91B1J720130212
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/middleeast/2013/07/2013775214936989.html
http://www.thestar.com.my/News/World/2013/07/04/ElBaradei-tops-list-to-head-Egypt-government--sources.aspx
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323419604578569830070537040.html#articleTabs%3Dvideo
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/aug/30/egyptian-leader-iran-syrian-rebels
http://www.ipsnews.net/2009/08/disarmament-egypt-rejects-us-nuclear-umbrella/
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/15/world/15aid.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
http://www.thenational.ae/news/world/middle-east/ex-mubarak-deputy-says-us-funded-opposition-during-uprising
http://www.bodley.ox.ac.uk/dept/scwmss/projects/suez/ms-eng-c-6168.html
http://www.eia.gov/countries/regions-topics.cfm?fips=wotc&trk=p3
http://www.nti.org/gsn/article/egypt-rules-out-joining-us-nuclear-umbrella/
http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/138623/joshua-stacher/why-the-generals-back-morsi