Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

RMU Apostle vs. Fat-ypus L-toro vs. ON3P Jeronimo

profile picture
easy.steezy
Posts: 2931 - Karma: 1,056
I'm looking for a 100ish waisted ski that performs well all over the mountain but can still kill it in the park for a wider ski. I've heard nothing but good things about all of these skis, but I'm just looking for some more input from more people! I'm 5'10" 160 lbs, and I'll be riding Whiteface, NY next year.

While I've heard plenty about the Jeronimo in these forums, I'm looking for me info on the Apostles and L-toros! How well do they ride on icy hardpack? Are they light, heavy, inbetween?

Since the Apostle only comes in 175 and 185, I would probably get the 185 since 175 is too short. Should I worry about the extra length even though it's a rockered ski?

Any and all help with get some karma, much appreciated guys!
May 31 2013 12:07AM
7 0
profile picture
MothaHucker
Posts: 4678 - Karma: 2,589
I ride on a pair of RMU Wisco's, essentially a symmetrical apostle. These things fucking rip, best all mountain ski I have ever owned, they slay everything from rails to ice to cliffs and pow. If you can get your hands on a pair of these you should get them ASAP, and if not, you should still go with the Apostle's. RMU is a solid company that makes solid skis.
May 31 2013 12:18AM
1 0
profile picture
easy.steezy
Posts: 2931 - Karma: 1,056
Sounds great! How is the durability? I've heard very good things concerning durability on the other two skis, so it'd be great if I didn't even have to think about that with my decision1
May 31 2013 12:23AM
0 0
profile picture
MothaHucker
Posts: 4678 - Karma: 2,589
bomber, only problems I have had after season of shredding them everywhere has been minor topsheet chipping.
May 31 2013 10:10AM
1 0
profile picture
broto
Posts: 9039 - Karma: 25,658
nothing but good things to say about j-mos here.
May 31 2013 10:25PM
1 0
profile picture
Jewschoolers
Posts: 1785 - Karma: 1,142
these are ll good skis made by good dudes. im sure you wont be disappointed with whatever you choose. ive personally never ridden rmu but fatypus and on3p make some great skis. i love my jmos
Jun 1 2013 4:11PM
1 0
profile picture
life_is_hood
Posts: 502 - Karma: 1,972
L-toros are sick, pretty soft though so if you dont like that dont get l-toros. nothing but good things to say about them though.
Jun 3 2013 1:24PM
1 0
profile picture
easy.steezy
Posts: 2931 - Karma: 1,056
Does there softness hinder their ability to charge through crud? How're they on jumps?
Jun 3 2013 4:02PM
0 0
profile picture
T.O.
Posts: 740 - Karma: 97
Bumping this thread. Deciding between these three for an everyday ski. Be used 85% allmountain/powder and 15% rails. I prefer my skis softer and to be real playful. What you guys think? I'm more leaning towards the l-toro or apostle.
Sep 24 2013 10:12PM
0 0
profile picture
Park.
Posts: 2480 - Karma: 4,582
RMU skis are sooo underrated but fatypus makes some killer gear. I would say RMU is more fun simplyu from the design of the ski. think of it is as a fat Halo and the the fatypus reminds me of a line ski. couldnt tell u which one tho. probably the abang playfullness with way more backbone and better tho.
Sep 24 2013 10:30PM
0 0
profile picture
Ducky.
Posts: 5811 - Karma: 1,420
.
Sep 24 2013 10:33PM
0 0
profile picture
Slowbro
Posts: 3672 - Karma: 19,030
how long are your wiscos?
Sep 24 2013 11:09PM
0 0
profile picture
XtRemE11
Posts: 5680 - Karma: 268
care to explain a little more? hows the flex? flat underfoot? width? length? how much rocker and how early does it start? the website doesnt say much.
Sep 25 2013 12:20AM
0 0
profile picture
MothaHucker
Posts: 4678 - Karma: 2,589
170 length, moderately stiff, cambered underfoot, rocker in tip and tail, not sure of the exact profile. Dimensions are 114-121-102-121-114
Sep 25 2013 12:49AM
0 0
profile picture
life_is_hood
Posts: 502 - Karma: 1,972
They destroyed whatever shitty snow was left at A basin in June so I'd say they charge through crud. I haven't really hit anything bigger than 20 ft on them yet seeing as I got them late season but my overall impression is that they are a very fun, playful, soft/buttery yet stable ski. Just my $.02 but I would totally recommend them.
Sep 25 2013 2:53AM
0 0
profile picture
brizz
Posts: 1051 - Karma: 74

Rode the apostles all last year. The RMUs were a very playful ski that handles its own in the woods and park. The flex underfoot feels fairly stiff but tips seem a bit softer but I never really felt the ski was a noodle. They do seem to like to be on edge and they get a tad squirrely when going real fast straight. They excel in tight spaces in soft snow. Durability seems extremely solid but I did need some work done when I first got them cause the base was concave (and still isn’t quite flat). Really don't think you could go wrong with either

Sep 25 2013 2:19PM
0 0
profile picture
T.O.
Posts: 740 - Karma: 97
Do fatypus measure true to length?
Sep 25 2013 2:33PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)