Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Will Tanner ever move to Armada for outerwear?

profile picture
3rik
Posts: 549 - Karma: 1,651
With JP's switch to the Armada Outerwear program, maybe Tanner is feeling a need for change too. Tanner's got a sick Oakley pro-model, but hell JP had a sick Orage pro-model too so what's stopping Tanner from switching, aside of course from a contract, but who know's maybe he'll choose to put in the same testing and knowledge on Armada's outerwear program as JP is now. JP said in his BroBomb interview that he really thought it made sense to make the switch since he was a part-owner and maybe Tanner feels the same way. Feel free to put in your thoughts CCREWSOLDIER.



BOOMSHOT
Nov 19 2012 10:02PM
3 1
profile picture
~~~~~~~~
Posts: 2345 - Karma: 2,104
Maybe, maybe not.
Nov 19 2012 10:03PM
0 0
profile picture
NPCPLUS
Posts: 162 - Karma: -155
who is Will Tanner?
Nov 19 2012 10:06PM
0 0
profile picture
Chubz.
Posts: 13918 - Karma: 25,656
i'd be crushed if he left oakley.
Nov 19 2012 10:06PM
0 0
profile picture
Holte
Posts: 10730 - Karma: 7,744
Probably. Give it 30 years.
Nov 19 2012 10:07PM
0 0
profile picture
Mr.Sloth
Posts: 5091 - Karma: 13,469
I heard he skis with Todd Wallnuts and the 2bi4 crew
Nov 19 2012 10:11PM
0 0
profile picture
Bogs
Posts: 4296 - Karma: 1,361
doubt it. i bet he makes a lot wearing oakley than he would wearing armada
Nov 19 2012 10:18PM
0 0
profile picture
CrotchKiller
Posts: 9037 - Karma: 6,940
not unless Oakley drops him
Nov 19 2012 10:19PM
0 0
profile picture
Parrish
Posts: 8695 - Karma: 1,007
.

I don't see tanner moving away from Oakley as they have backed him so long in outerwear and in optics. As far as I know they have a pretty good relationship.
Nov 19 2012 10:27PM
0 0
profile picture
PeppermillReno
Posts: 4750 - Karma: -557
I got his Oakley jacket the Jamaica one its fuckin sick. I can ski in it with only a tee shirt on underneath if I want on days that aren't particularly warm and you can't do that in many non insulated jackets.

Oakley's gore tex stuff is bomb the snow pants are sick too.

Dunno why he'd drop them.


I'd consider Armada's if they made the AK JJ 10 cm longer and stopped having short turn radius's.

Short turn radius skis are gay (unless you have a reason for wanting to make a lot of turns.) But dudes making tons of tight turns on corduroys look like fuckin idiots and almost as dumb as snowboarders.
Nov 19 2012 10:40PM
0 1
profile picture
585.
Posts: 4059 - Karma: 77
Maybe
Nov 19 2012 10:44PM
0 0
profile picture
Forcillo
Posts: 3801 - Karma: 3,580
He is the freeskiing face of Oakley. Red Bull picked up Bobby before dropping Tanner, which made sense, as one was, in a way, replacing the latter. But Oakley hasn't made any recent additions nor do they have another big time freeskier with outerwear and optic pro models. It just would not be logical for them until they add another huge athlete.
Nov 19 2012 10:53PM
0 0
profile picture
CrotchKiller
Posts: 9037 - Karma: 6,940
that was pretty relevant
Nov 19 2012 11:03PM
0 0
profile picture
BE..
Posts: 1185 - Karma: 81
For one this whole post is terribly irrelevant.

And also since when has a short turning radius on a ski been a bad thing? It's not as if you can only turn that length, you just can turn them tighter if you want to. If Tanner Hall can ski them in Alaska, I'm sure they would work fine for you.
Nov 19 2012 11:25PM
0 0
profile picture
willysworld
Posts: 2116 - Karma: 5,482
Do you cry your self to sleep at night?
Nov 19 2012 11:28PM
0 0
profile picture
Nieds
Posts: 832 - Karma: 1,926
I hope your joking.
Nov 19 2012 11:33PM
0 0
profile picture
3rik
Posts: 549 - Karma: 1,651
Alright I forgot that everyone on Newschoolers is a fag.


JP left Orage to work with Armada in their outerwear department, why wouldn't Tanner? I did not say that Oakley would drop him and I'm aware of how long they've been working together.

Just thought I would get the idea out there and see what everyone else had to say.
Nov 20 2012 12:13AM
0 0
profile picture
GML
Posts: 224 - Karma: 192
more sponserors=more money going to him
Nov 20 2012 12:33AM
0 0
profile picture
SSteezle
Posts: 9221 - Karma: 9,939
you seem like one of those people that talks about themselves, then why someone tries to jump in on the conversation, instead of listening you just start thinking up of more stuff to talk about
Nov 20 2012 12:43AM
0 0
profile picture
3rik
Posts: 549 - Karma: 1,651
Tanner riding Armada Outerwear = More kids riding riding in Armada Outerwear = More money into his company
Nov 20 2012 12:55AM
0 0
profile picture
SKI.ING
Posts: 2695 - Karma: 2,535
"Kids" don't like Tanner, so no. We, I will assume you're older since you said kids, like Tanner. For kids their hero is Tom Wallisch and that's okay. Just pointing out that you have his demographic wrong.
Nov 20 2012 1:09AM
0 0
profile picture
CrotchKiller
Posts: 9037 - Karma: 6,940
haha ya we are all such fags

But seriously why would Tanner leave Oakley?

Not sure why JP left Orage but i feel like he is getting paid about the same and is now sponsored for outerwear by the company he is a part owner in.

If Tanner was to leave Oakley he would loose a ton of money and a ton of exposure, since his separation with Red Bull i would say Oakley is his biggest sponsor(unless he was in fact picked up by rockstar.)


Nov 20 2012 1:57AM
0 0
profile picture
Bateman
Posts: 8590 - Karma: 8,600
which they should
Nov 20 2012 2:34AM
0 0
profile picture
CrotchKiller
Posts: 9037 - Karma: 6,940
disagree,
and they won't

Nov 20 2012 3:01AM
0 0
profile picture
Crispy.
Posts: 6102 - Karma: 7,626
MAYBE.
Nov 20 2012 7:19AM
0 0
profile picture
KravtZ
Posts: 6637 - Karma: 2,629
well now we all know your some 15 year old kid who is pretty awful at skiing becuse apparently you cant turn. There are no "short radius" twin tips especially the AK JJ your an idiot.
Nov 20 2012 7:27AM
0 0
profile picture
250r
Posts: 2274 - Karma: 1,020
not trying to defcnd that kid, but jjs do have the turning radius of snowblades...definitely not high speed chargers. Just look at the difference in sidecut between jjs and other armadas compared to the sidecut on praxis skis.
Nov 20 2012 7:59AM
0 0
profile picture
blindside
Posts: 5619 - Karma: 1,199
As many have pointed out, Tanner is a huge sunk cost for Oakley and vice versa. Barring some catastrophic event -which you can't rule out with Tanner- it is very unlikely he would switch, or be dropped.
Nov 20 2012 10:48AM
0 0
profile picture
Blurst
Posts: 13577 - Karma: 10,168
Classic relevant post!
Nov 20 2012 10:52AM
0 0
profile picture
Session
Posts: 5318 - Karma: 21,362
.
Nov 20 2012 11:43AM
0 0
profile picture
Justo8484
Posts: 3905 - Karma: 204
I guess you haven't heard of this guy named Seth Morrison?
Nov 20 2012 11:56AM
0 0
profile picture
Peach.
Posts: 3879 - Karma: 933
He'll stay on Oakley. At least that's my guess. They've been behind Tanner forever. Not to mention that Oakley is also one, if not the, biggest names in the Optics game.
Armada isn't.
Nov 20 2012 12:03PM
0 0
profile picture
Forcillo
Posts: 3801 - Karma: 3,580
Fuck, I forgot he was on Oakley. Disregard my post, it is possible.
Nov 20 2012 2:58PM
0 0
profile picture
Forcillo
Posts: 3801 - Karma: 3,580
Nevermind, I remember my logic: Seth is a baller big mountain charger, and Tanner is more of Oakley's comp/park/BC Booters guy, since Simon essentially dropped from the face of the earth.
Nov 20 2012 3:00PM
0 0
profile picture
CrotchKiller
Posts: 9037 - Karma: 6,940
Almost all of NS has heard of Seth but the general public hasn't. Tanner is still one of the main faces of freeskiing
Nov 20 2012 3:07PM
0 0
profile picture
rzarector
Posts: 590 - Karma: 70
Taylor (Michigan)

What is your favorite trick to pull off? and what kind of gear do u run in?

Tanner Hall
(7:28 PM)


MY FAVORITE KIND OF TRICK TO PULL OFF IS ANYTHING SMOOTH, AND MY GEAR IS OAKLEY. ALWAYS HAS, ALWAYS WILL BE.

Nov 20 2012 3:39PM
0 0
profile picture
zbphoto
Posts: 7789 - Karma: 12,037
A whole 18m!!!! Damn thats a long turn!!!! I'm sorry but what in the fuck am I reading?

Don't get me wrong a short radius ski is fine if thats your thing, they are probably easier to ski for park skiers getting into the pow game (basically 95% of Armada's customers), your post is just so beyond wrong. Once you get up to speed nothing can match a 30m+ turn, anything sub 20m will just squirl out and deflect especially if it has a crazy rocker/taper profile (JJ).

Just for reference:
4frnt Ren - 35m
ON3P C&D - 33m
Rossi Squad 7 - 29m
Nov 20 2012 4:00PM
0 0
profile picture
K-Thomas
Posts: 2700 - Karma: 604
Dumont, and like mentioned above... Morrison. Speaking of, I've got a pair of Dumont Splice's for sale if anyone's interested haha.
Nov 20 2012 4:42PM
0 0
profile picture
PeppermillReno
Posts: 4750 - Karma: -557
Yah this is it.

I don't know what that kid is after in his skis but you can't go fast AND make short turns in powder.

30m is the bare minimum a turn radius should be for a powder ski...(unless you feel the need to make a shitload of turns.)
Nov 20 2012 7:31PM
0 0
profile picture
mode2n
Posts: 2856 - Karma: 255
I'll be very surprised if Tanner leaves Oakley's outerwear program
Nov 20 2012 7:48PM
0 0
profile picture
4man
Posts: 159 - Karma: 151
Seth Morison and Simon dumont?
Nov 20 2012 8:23PM
0 0
profile picture
JWeinstock
Posts: 3439 - Karma: 1,352
.
Nov 20 2012 9:21PM
0 0
profile picture
easy.steezy
Posts: 2931 - Karma: 1,056
This, Tanner's been with Oakley since his very beginning.
Nov 20 2012 9:38PM
0 0
profile picture
SwagtasticWalrus
Posts: 1268 - Karma: 184
Or Simon Dumont?
Nov 20 2012 10:00PM
0 0
profile picture
EARL
Posts: 598 - Karma: 3,052
Oh but if you care about money is this sport you're a sell out and everyone hates on you so... scratch that idea right? Because hell, travel is free and so is everything else!
Nov 20 2012 11:11PM
0 0
profile picture
ski_ENDUB
Posts: 2535 - Karma: 86
fuck that shit, it's not selling out, it's cashing in. anyone who says they're selling out is jealous because they hate what they get paid to do
Nov 20 2012 11:25PM
0 0
profile picture
EARL
Posts: 598 - Karma: 3,052
I know, without money there wouldn't be professionals of any sorts. That's why I HATE the fact that a lot of the NS community and skiing kids in general call people sell out's / talk shit on people who sign legitimate contracts with companies with legitimate money. They say that it's lame when people sign with companies such as RedBull, Target, ect., but in reality without those companies our sport won't grow. It won't get to the general public and if it doesn't ever reach the public and people don't know about it, then the sport will die just like any other sport that had lack of interest / funding. Whether people like it or not, those are the companies with money and those are the athletes that will continue to be able to just AFFORD to keep skiing and doing what they love.. That's my $.02 from observing the sport in general in the last couple of years / discussing with other skiers.
Nov 20 2012 11:37PM
0 0
profile picture
ianj
Posts: 536 - Karma: 167
This. Simon hans't really been heard from in a while. Last photo I saw of him was a Head AD in the Freeskier Buyers Guide. Haven't seen anything else. His suit for this season looks hideous.... Irrelevant post I know but I thought I'd share it.
Nov 20 2012 11:51PM
0 0
profile picture
NPF
Posts: 5152 - Karma: 12,116
Nailed it. this is from his profile...

Just your average 27 y/o entrepreneur. Try to approach my occupation the same way I approach a steep bowl of fresh powder. I am from Boston. In the winter I live in the casinos, bet college basketball, and ski tahoe mountains :). Very sorry if you don't like my posts its the internet I really can't help but troll like an immature teenager when I do post on forums. Only losers take internet forums seriously.



he also seems like one of those people that think they are really good at skiing and talk it up a lot then act like a douche because of it, but actually they suck.
Nov 20 2012 11:53PM
0 0
profile picture
fennjack
Posts: 286 - Karma: 128
He seems more loyal to Armada than Oakley
Nov 20 2012 11:56PM
0 0
profile picture
Noha
Posts: 1281 - Karma: 2,684
NOOOOOOO, hes set with oakley. They give the dude fucking signature shit. So does armada, so he should stay with oakley to have his name on more variaties of shit
Nov 21 2012 12:18AM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)