Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

how are these skis?

profile picture
gnay
Posts: 278 - Karma: 10
how are the stls in the back country and in powder?
Oct 21 2004 7:55PM
0 0
profile picture
scofield
Posts: 7973 - Karma: 2,466
they have a waist of like 78.. i doubt they're any good



-Bon Bons
**Stept Productions**
Enom Headwear.

'got caught with underage drinking and a bong. anyone know what charges i could be facing?' -keukawake
'being a badass, first degree'- Melvs
Oct 21 2004 8:09PM
0 0
profile picture
gnay
Posts: 278 - Karma: 10
they are no good? humm anyone have them that knows
Oct 21 2004 8:14PM
0 0
profile picture
LastEmperor
Posts: 347 - Karma: 10
not what they're meant for, but guess it depends on how long they are and how deep the snow is...



www.westcoastwakeskates.com
www.wakeup-wakeboards.com
'everyday above ground is a good one'
Oct 21 2004 8:57PM
0 0
profile picture
ARSpickert
Posts: 533 - Karma: 25
just get msp's


GET CRAZY WITH THE CHEEZE WIZZ!!!!
Oct 21 2004 9:01PM
0 0
profile picture
SKlAN
Posts: 1109 - Karma: 205
lets see probably like any other park ski under 80 under foot would. Bad.
www.DeValeclothing.com
Oct 21 2004 9:02PM
0 0
profile picture
LastEmperor
Posts: 347 - Karma: 10
the 177's are 82 underfoot, only a cm diff than the msp's there. i mean, they're not gonna be great, but you'll def be able to use them and be fine with it if they're pretty long. it'd be easier with somethin fatter, but if u don't plan on skiin that much pow then go for it. i'd rather jib on fat skis than use park skis in powder, but that's just me



www.westcoastwakeskates.com
www.wakeup-wakeboards.com
'everyday above ground is a good one'
Oct 21 2004 9:06PM
0 0
profile picture
gnay
Posts: 278 - Karma: 10
what are some good fat skis that have smaller sizes
Oct 21 2004 9:24PM
0 0
profile picture
thejackamo
Posts: 1785 - Karma: 11
pistols, pollards, motherships...

there's probably a couple more but i can't think of them right now


_____________________
'yeah line stuff blows, i got a pair of the new pollards and once i took the wrapper off the spontaneously combusted' - schlonginator
Oct 21 2004 9:46PM
0 0
profile picture
Aseets
Posts: 2171 - Karma: 17
i always thought msp's at 180 cm had a 92 mm waist. but whatever
Oct 21 2004 9:49PM
0 0
profile picture
thejackamo
Posts: 1785 - Karma: 11
^yeah, he said one centimeter.


_____________________
'yeah line stuff blows, i got a pair of the new pollards and once i took the wrapper off the spontaneously combusted' - schlonginator
Oct 21 2004 9:51PM
0 0
profile picture
PowderCanuck
Posts: 2626 - Karma: 10
i like how he said 'only one cm'... that's a pretty big difference from 82mm to 92mm


_______________________

Screw this I'm going skiing
Oct 21 2004 10:16PM
0 0
profile picture
kjfreerider
Posts: 2495 - Karma: 14
uh ya cm arnt a big difference for length but for width mm make a big difference




dont get it twisted
Oct 22 2004 12:05AM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)