Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

US pulling out of Iraq

profile picture
CluckaChuck
Posts: 1541 - Karma: 734
By next year, watching it on TV
Oct 21 2011 12:46PM
0 0
profile picture
uosdwiSrjewoH
Posts: 4220 - Karma: 121
pulling out of a rack.
Oct 23 2011 9:58PM
0 0
profile picture
theline
Posts: 1507 - Karma: 92
lawyer'd
Oct 23 2011 11:38PM
0 0
profile picture
Gorilla.Steeze
Posts: 2215 - Karma: 43
This is all talk. Of course we will still have troops in Iraq for years to come. We still have troops in Korea, Japan and Germany for gods sake.
Oct 23 2011 11:46PM
0 0
profile picture
arandomname
Posts: 1989 - Karma: 18
We armed the Mujahideen against the Russians 20 years ago.  This guy is either implying that what we armed them with back then is the only thing they have against us now or we were arming them while fighting them, both of which are complete bullshit.  Overall, what we gave them during the days of the Mujahideen is pretty much completely irrelevant.
Oct 24 2011 2:32PM
0 0
profile picture
BrewskiJr
Posts: 5738 - Karma: 1,478
I was supposed to pull out of your mom a dozen or so years ago....




And you see how that went?
Oct 24 2011 2:33PM
0 0
profile picture
arandomname
Posts: 1989 - Karma: 18
There could probably be a number of places.  People act as if Al Qaeda doesn't have the sources to get weapons.
Oct 24 2011 2:38PM
0 0
profile picture
corona
Posts: 12752 - Karma: 32,258
They gave them less than 500. There's no way there have been any left for years.
Oct 24 2011 2:40PM
0 0
profile picture
corona
Posts: 12752 - Karma: 32,258
I also doubt this, Al Qaeda doesn't strike me as an organization that would buy shoulder missiles at 40 grand a piece. And stingers are the kind of weapon that would be incredibly difficult to get a hold of in any kind of quantity without US officials knowing.
Oct 24 2011 2:43PM
0 0
profile picture
corona
Posts: 12752 - Karma: 32,258
But stingers weren't the only weapons the US gave them in the 80's
Oct 24 2011 2:45PM
0 0
profile picture
arandomname
Posts: 1989 - Karma: 18
They're the largest terrorist organization in the world.  I also really doubt that if US officials knew, they would be telling the whole public that Al Qaeda has huge missiles capable of killing many US soldiers.
Oct 24 2011 2:47PM
0 0
profile picture
corona
Posts: 12752 - Karma: 32,258
oh, and to add another thought. The US had a buy back program for the stingers that weren't used. They got almost all of them back. Some they didn't, but the amount that would have been left were almost all sold outside Afghanistan apparently. Any that would have been left in the country are so small in number it barely even matters.
Oct 24 2011 2:48PM
0 0
profile picture
corona
Posts: 12752 - Karma: 32,258
doesn't mean they have the money or the ability to buy stingers from a strictly regulated Arizona company which no doubt has the CIA/whoever breathing down their back on every sale they do outside the US government. It would be more likely they have Chinese equivalents.
Oct 24 2011 2:50PM
0 0
profile picture
theabortionator
Posts: 51261 - Karma: 157,412
Lol.


They're so over hyped it's unreal. We could take them out if we wanted to
Oct 24 2011 7:01PM
0 0
profile picture
arandomname
Posts: 1989 - Karma: 18

Yeah, totally, same with the Viet Cong, right?

You are ignorant of any real knowledge about the War on Terror, as is most people on Newschoolers, myself included.

Oct 24 2011 7:27PM
0 0
profile picture
theabortionator
Posts: 51261 - Karma: 157,412
The "war on terror".

Such a well defined war, with well defined and easily achievable goals.

^sarcasm.



Oct 24 2011 7:29PM
0 0
profile picture
arandomname
Posts: 1989 - Karma: 18
You are proving my point.  That is why it's so hard to fight Al Qaeda.
Oct 24 2011 7:32PM
0 0
profile picture
theabortionator
Posts: 51261 - Karma: 157,412
Proving what point?
Oct 24 2011 7:33PM
0 0
profile picture
arandomname
Posts: 1989 - Karma: 18
That we can just take them out whenever we want.
Oct 24 2011 7:42PM
0 0
profile picture
thelizards
Posts: 4042 - Karma: 43
this.

and the taliban/radicals have been making huge threats to get us out by 2012 (says my history teacher who is a muthafucking genius)
Oct 24 2011 7:55PM
0 0
profile picture
feihlination
Posts: 8356 - Karma: 1,084
face it that the US achieved close to nothing and you just ruined your own country with the associated costs. getting out of there is absolutely necessary, as this problem CAN NOT BE solved with weapons.

it was a blind and uncontrolled revenge, conducted by the worlds leading, western, civilized and christian nation to go the afghanistan with idk how many violations of international laws. hundreds of thousands civilians died because 3000 americans died. this is plain and simple wrong.

iraq war was based (just like the vietnam conflict) on fake information and again footed on highly doubtful legal grounds. hussein was a monster, yes, thanks for destroying him though.

the nato-alliance in lybia was a shithole too (although the US didnt play the biggest part i guess).

so, right now, its afghanistan, iraq and lybia, all of them will NOT experience long phases of freedom and peace because the problems behind the obvious problem werent tackled. iraq is an artifical country, before the british occupation, there was never some state with these borders. groups within the inhabitants hate each other to death and this wont work, plain and simple. afghanistan will soon be back to taliban-control with all the corresponding problems (lack of education, raise of fundamentalism,...). in lybia, the scharia will probably be the base for the legal system and its probable that it will become a fundamentally islamic state.

then, there is syria, massacres against civilians without an end, but no intervention there? could it be that syria has too less oil or opium plants?

i hate to think of our world like that, but if you take the facts its kinda obvious that weapon lobbyists, oil lobbyists and drug traffickers control more than you want them to.
Nov 22 2011 10:52AM
0 0
profile picture
DaveM
Posts: 2936 - Karma: 1,558
mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm, greatest thing ever.
Nov 22 2011 11:01AM
0 0
profile picture
Dustin.
Posts: 13839 - Karma: 7,704
I think you just completely contradicted yourself. I thought you said taking out Al Quaeda is easy (stupid statement) and now you are sarcastically acknowledging how difficult that task?

Normally what you say is stupid, but this is funnier than usual.
Nov 22 2011 11:49AM
0 0
profile picture
Dustin.
Posts: 13839 - Karma: 7,704
Well, I think it's safe to say that well over 50% of the people in the military now joined after 9/11 when war seemed/was a certainty, so I think that first point is not only weak but completely wrong. If you join almost any service, it is well known that you will deploy at some point.

And I disagree on the Afghani leaders padding wallets. What is the value of excessive amounts of cash in Afghanistan? There's one highway in the whole country, made of dirt in most parts. What are you going to buy? A summer home in Pakistan? I don't know, I just don't see eye to eye there simply because I don't see the motivation. I'm sure I'm missing something.

Afghanistan was a nice country before the Soviet invasion and ensuing Taliban rule. Many of the older patriots in that nation want to turn it back into what it once was before their history is gone forever.
Nov 22 2011 11:56AM
0 0
profile picture
geteducated
Posts: 6410 - Karma: 86
uhh for starers, the money that we gave to the war/druglords so that we can buy some of their influence will go right back into asserting their tribal dominance when we leave.
Nov 22 2011 11:59AM
0 0
profile picture
Dustin.
Posts: 13839 - Karma: 7,704
Do you still consider them the political leaders of Afghanistan? That's kind of the grey area that has our troops there still, but I see what your stance. That's the trouble with the whole situation.
Nov 22 2011 12:01PM
0 0
profile picture
geteducated
Posts: 6410 - Karma: 86
i skimmed this article, but i did see this sentence,

Many warlords in Afghanistan occupy government posts, but their reach extends well beyond their appointed role.

http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Asia-South-Central/2011/0808/Will-Afghanistan-return-to-an-era-of-warlord-rule-after-NATO-leaves

there has been rumors that we have been paying warlords not to attack the fuel convoys. for the warlords, taliban is bad for business, so we pay the warlords and they keep the taliban away from the convoys for the time needed, then its back to business as usual.
Nov 22 2011 12:06PM
0 0
profile picture
theabortionator
Posts: 51261 - Karma: 157,412
"and now you are sarcastically acknowledging how difficult that task?"

Um where the fuck did I say that. Def not. The "war on terror" is a fucking scam at best. This is a war that we won't "win" The goals aren't well defined, so we'll probably be able to stay fighting in the middle east for a long long time.

We should have never been over there. We should bring our troops home now.

"Normally what you say is stupid, but this is funnier than usual."

learn to read, herp derp.
Nov 22 2011 12:08PM
0 0
profile picture
Curb.
Posts: 370 - Karma: 91
i think i love you?
Nov 22 2011 12:57PM
0 0
profile picture
RubberSoul
Posts: 11249 - Karma: 14,642
my brain's still recovering from that guy on the first page saying that al qaeda had enough nukes to blow up half the world, and that if we had left iraq 3 years after we went in, the US probably wouldnt exist

holy fuck

Nov 22 2011 1:12PM
0 0
profile picture
theabortionator
Posts: 51261 - Karma: 157,412
I hear you. That post was amazing. Would have been brilliant if trolling. Instead it was just massively WUT
Nov 22 2011 1:22PM
0 0
profile picture
Toasty.
Posts: 6195 - Karma: 2,278
oh hai

well from what the most elite special forces team in the military on my base has told me, i like to believe them
Nov 22 2011 1:23PM
0 0
profile picture
no_steeze
Posts: 23992 - Karma: 4,270
in my history class last year we were talking about pulling american troops out of afghanistan and a girl in my class said "well wouldn't we have to do it secretly because if the taliban knew we were pulling out all of our troops on a certain day they'd attack a day later"

pulling out means gradually decreasing the number of troops, not teleporting every piece of military equipment down to the last bullet casing back to the us. it's inevitable that we will always have troops in iraq, iran, and afghanistan. that's the shitstorm we've created
Nov 22 2011 1:26PM
0 0
profile picture
theabortionator
Posts: 51261 - Karma: 157,412
For sure. Even if trying to be quick it would take time.



And people seriously don't seem to understand how safe we are in the U.S. with a massive military and all. We don't have to be in all these countries to be safe.
Nov 22 2011 1:29PM
0 0
profile picture
Toasty.
Posts: 6195 - Karma: 2,278
saying that a country has nukes isnt always a classified info. the gov't announces it all the time
Nov 22 2011 1:33PM
0 0
profile picture
RubberSoul
Posts: 11249 - Karma: 14,642
either you're fucking with me, you completely misinterpreted what they guy said, or the guy was completely talking out of his ass. you can't honestly be sitting here telling me that al qaeda has enough nukes/power to blow up half the world. or to think that if we had pulled out of iraq, the US probably wouldnt exist right now. i mean, are you even thinking about the claims youre making?

pull your head out of your ass and realize that the shit youre saying is pants-on-head retarded and you sound like an idiot. stop spreading such insane misinformation, there are probably kids on this site stupid enough to believe nonsense like that. jesus christ
Nov 22 2011 1:35PM
0 0
profile picture
Toasty.
Posts: 6195 - Karma: 2,278
whoa dude, simmer down.

i believe i said on the first page that they DID have enough nukes. but obviously we have found a lot of them.
Nov 22 2011 1:40PM
0 0
profile picture
RubberSoul
Posts: 11249 - Karma: 14,642
you could help me "simmer down" by not saying the most stupid shit ive ever heard in my life. deal?
Nov 22 2011 1:58PM
0 0
profile picture
Toasty.
Posts: 6195 - Karma: 2,278
deal
Nov 22 2011 2:03PM
0 0
profile picture
feihlination
Posts: 8356 - Karma: 1,084
thx

now the whole shit goes into the next round with iran. some joined forces operation (israel/US/nato) will invade iran and not find a single fuck.

Nov 22 2011 2:08PM
0 0
profile picture
Toasty.
Posts: 6195 - Karma: 2,278
one more thing, they guy that told me a lot of this stuff, was MaSgt Adams...... they guy that died for your country.....

kbai
Nov 22 2011 2:15PM
0 0
profile picture
feihlination
Posts: 8356 - Karma: 1,084
so respect to him.

but it has no influence on the validity of his "story".
Nov 22 2011 2:19PM
0 0
profile picture
theabortionator
Posts: 51261 - Karma: 157,412
one more thing, the guy that told me you were wrong was Jesus...... The guy that died for your sins

kbai
Nov 22 2011 2:23PM
0 0
profile picture
TheClap.
Posts: 21649 - Karma: 4,013
its amazing how dumb some of you truly are, so misinformed and influenced its funny
Nov 22 2011 2:23PM
0 0
profile picture
Toasty.
Posts: 6195 - Karma: 2,278
im an atheist
Nov 22 2011 2:28PM
0 0
profile picture
theabortionator
Posts: 51261 - Karma: 157,412
You can believe what you want but he's still real.



There are no atheists in fox holes
Nov 22 2011 2:30PM
0 0
profile picture
feihlination
Posts: 8356 - Karma: 1,084
youre tough to figure out
Nov 22 2011 2:33PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)