*Looks around* Oh. No. I guess I missed the part where I was sitting in front of my computer typing. Here I was thinking I was still out on the hill.
I have read every word of everything you've posted, and it has continued to make less and less sense as we go along. If you've bothered to read any of my previous posts in this thread, you would see that I have addressed a minimum of 1 sentence of your grade school level jabber in each one.
As for pulling the "I'm sorry you are?" card, last time I checked, this is a public discussion. You should expect the, ready for it? PUBLIC to chime in.
How old are you honestly? I am guessing somewhere between 10 and 18, because this kind of behavior is really only prevalent in that demographic. Well, that one, and liberal academics who are WAY too uncool and crusty to ski.
So that you don't fly off the handle with another comment about money, dude, you can stop reading here unless you want to read discussion related back to the ORIGINAL topic of this discussion.
OP, I agree 100%. The bottom line is that you could take the names and sexes off of a contract COMPLETELY, and an exec who is controlling the money is going to pay a woman less than a man, because BY THE NUMBERS, your average female athlete is currently pulling in less money.
I don't think it's right, but it's also out of my control and the nature of the beast.