Wall vs Cron Crypt

Bump.

i ski the 09' walls and they are beastly, they have flex when you need them to but are also amazing for buttering and sick for huge jumps. iv switched off with people with different line skis (iv skiied anthems, afterbangs, cronics, and blends. in my opinion the walls for sure beat the cronics. but if you are looking for like an allmountain and park ski that what the cronics are for. my walls have held up against much beating and i love em. also if you dont want to spend the cash for the walls buy anthems, iv had my 07' anthems for 3ish years now and there has not been one major chip off the topsheet or any damage to the edges, you really cant kill anthems.

bump

I have 2010 walls and I love them, by far the best skis I have ridden provided I have not skied the other skis you mentioned. But I love the walls, i'm a light guy at 135 pounds and ski 177 walls and i wouldnt want a ski thats any flexier or stiffer. I think it hits the sweet spot. The symmetrical side cut is sick in the park but I also like how they are not symmetrical flex. I like having softer tails then tips, makes ripping up groomers a lot nicer. I have had no edge cracks, or other damage besides standard top sheet chipping. This is my second season on them. Overall can't go wrong with this ski.

i think walls are symmetrical and chronics aren't. thats kind of a difference. ive only skied chronics and they are on the stiffer side, and are more of an all mountain ski, at least in my experience.

cronic crypts are stiff