Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

T2i lens question

profile picture
MTshred
Posts: 117 - Karma: 22
Thinkin about picking up one possibly but would not have enough dough to get an additional lense other then the 18-55 kit lens. I am new to dslrs and just basicaly wanted to know if the kit lens is usable in many different situations, particularly filming skiing. and also when i do get a new lens what should be the first I go for?
Feb 10 2011 12:48PM
0 0
profile picture
eheath
Posts: 61087 - Karma: 118,024
Its usable, but the 18-55 kit lens is probably the worst lens canon makes. If you get a 50mm 1.8, which is 90-100 bucks brand new, that will be a nice starter lens too along with your kit lens.
Feb 10 2011 12:52PM
0 0
profile picture
TetonGravity
Posts: 104 - Karma: 5,344
The lens will work if that is all you can afford. My favorite lens for shooting skiing is the 70-200 IS 2.8. You can't use the zoom on the kit lens without getting exposure shifts. For now that lens will work just fine though. Shoot with what you can afford and take it from there.
Feb 10 2011 12:52PM
0 0
profile picture
MTshred
Posts: 117 - Karma: 22
thanks guys!
Feb 10 2011 12:54PM
0 0
profile picture
jibbinc.
Posts: 3355 - Karma: 2,497
Sigma 18 - 50 f2.8 is a great upgrade

zoom and focusing are internal so the lens doesnt change in length ever.

the HSM also makes focusing very quiePr
Feb 10 2011 5:02PM
0 0
profile picture
WillStart
Posts: 3955 - Karma: 3,192
true, the 50mm f/1.8 is great (i have the 50mm f/1.4 myself), but you have to also keep in mind that the T2i is a crop sensor camera, meaning that the 50mm is going to act more like an 80mm, making it pretty tight and hard to film with if not on a tripod or very good with a glidecam. for a wider lens that will act like a 50mm, i suggest looking into the Sigma 30mm f/1.4.

I have Canon's 17-55mm f/2.8 lens, it's amazing. However, it's really expensive so another good one, as i believe kelsey suggested, is the tamron 18-55 f/2.8
Feb 10 2011 5:12PM
0 0
profile picture
WillStart
Posts: 3955 - Karma: 3,192
i mean sigma. i think tamron might make a decent one too though
Feb 10 2011 5:13PM
0 0
profile picture
p.hawks
Posts: 2832 - Karma: 581
just wondering, but wouldn't he want something wider than a 50mm to compensate for the 1.6x crop? I had heard the the sigma 30mm f1.4 was a pretty popular lens for the t2i, but it is like $440 (not that much compared to others, but half the cost of his camera with the kit lens)

anyone else know anything about this?
Feb 10 2011 6:25PM
0 0
profile picture
WillStart
Posts: 3955 - Karma: 3,192
haha yea read my post :)
Feb 10 2011 6:28PM
0 0
profile picture
p.hawks
Posts: 2832 - Karma: 581
sorry, i just saw the first part and assumed it was all about the zooms.
Feb 10 2011 6:32PM
0 0
profile picture
jibbinc.
Posts: 3355 - Karma: 2,497
Sigma 18 - 50 f2.8
Tamron 17 - 50 f 2.8

differences, i am not sure
Feb 10 2011 7:21PM
0 0
profile picture
MTshred
Posts: 117 - Karma: 22
So if i just buy the body and the Tamron 17 - 50 f 2.8 , would that be a good setup? Are the tamron lenses good lenses? And also with the tamron lens would the 2.8 aperture eliminate the exposure changes when zooming that happens with the kit lens? ( I have been playing around with a friends with a kit lens and i hate it for that reason!)
Feb 19 2011 6:04PM
0 0
profile picture
WillStart
Posts: 3955 - Karma: 3,192
i don't know how good the lens is, never used it. but that focal length/speed will be a good lens for many different uses. i use my 17-55mm f/2.8 for just about everything. and yea, the aperture won't change while zooming. that only happens when the speed is a range (such as f/3.5-5.6) not when it's a single number (such as f/2.8).
Feb 19 2011 6:06PM
0 0
profile picture
MTshred
Posts: 117 - Karma: 22
okay awesome! Does anyone have any experience with any of the off brand lenses? Just want to make sure it is decent quality if possible
Feb 19 2011 6:18PM
0 0
profile picture
TetonGravity
Posts: 104 - Karma: 5,344
We own a few sigma lenses and they are quality. We use their 10mm fish and 10-20 wide angle. I like them alot.
Feb 19 2011 6:48PM
0 0
profile picture
50in07
Posts: 3070 - Karma: 1,471
I bought the 17-50 about a month ago and love it! Its super sharp and you can find them pretty cheap on ebay.
Feb 20 2011 12:15AM
0 0
profile picture
Ben.
Posts: 21463 - Karma: 683
Tamron 17-50 is a nice lens. Ive read reviews that say its sharper than the canon 17-40l, and for about half the price.


just be sure to buy the NON vc version. the one with vc is significantly less sharp.
Feb 20 2011 1:12AM
0 0
profile picture
MTshred
Posts: 117 - Karma: 22
Really? it seems like on ebay the ones with "vc" on them are more expensive.
Feb 20 2011 3:14AM
0 0
profile picture
MTshred
Posts: 117 - Karma: 22
Do you guys think as my first and only lens it would be best to have the tamron 17-50 2.8 or I have found a really good deal on craiglist for a tamron 28-75 2.8
Feb 20 2011 4:29AM
0 0
profile picture
[~_~]
Posts: 20239 - Karma: 1,273
A Pentax 50mm SMC 1.4 will absolutely slay any prime mentioned in this thread, and they cost around $100.
Feb 20 2011 3:17PM
0 0
profile picture
1337
Posts: 31038 - Karma: 29,000
dont you have to mod them though?
Feb 20 2011 11:04PM
0 0
profile picture
Ben.
Posts: 21463 - Karma: 683
nope. just need an adapter ring. only need to mod on full frame. and even then its super simple.


and to mtshred, yeah the vc is more expensive, but its actually less sharp. something with the vc throws off the elements just enough to make them not line up perfectly or something. idk the exact reason, i just know its proven that the vc is less sharp.
Feb 20 2011 11:26PM
0 0
profile picture
erikK
Posts: 3245 - Karma: 2,324
16-85 is my favourite zoom range for shooting snow sports, you might want to look into one
Feb 21 2011 1:39AM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)