Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Canon EF 8-15mm f/4L

profile picture
MADDECENT
Posts: 5579 - Karma: 951
Click for larger image

This lens looks amazing.

Discuss.
Oct 5 2010 12:07AM
0 0
profile picture
MADDECENT
Posts: 5579 - Karma: 951
A few sample shots about halfway down this article

http://philipbloom.net/2010/09/01/canon-4k-concept-camera-and-first-images-from-canon-expo-on-ny/

That single shot multi band camera looks insane too
Oct 5 2010 12:12AM
0 0
profile picture
BK
Posts: 2353 - Karma: 1,122
Wow that is really something. Just checked BH, that had no price or estimated date available yet. Have you heard what this lens will cost?
Oct 5 2010 3:12AM
0 0
profile picture
AviadIL
Posts: 245 - Karma: 30
i'd say it's gonna be like 900$ at most for not being f/2.8...
Oct 5 2010 3:56AM
0 0
profile picture
Ben.
Posts: 21463 - Karma: 683
this has been talked about for a while now. and last i saw it was supposed to be over a grand. like 1200 or something. which eliminates any sort of action sports use because not many people can afford to take a hit to a $1200+ lens.
Oct 5 2010 5:35AM
0 0
profile picture
canterbury
Posts: 2382 - Karma: 55
i hope you're kidding, an L series Ultra wideangle fisheye zoom for $900? yeah right
Oct 5 2010 6:54AM
0 0
profile picture
IanAvery-Leaf
Posts: 9926 - Karma: 9,344
I don't really understand it, why would they stop producing the 15mm f2.8 for this? They should have kept that and then made a crop sensor fisheye, like the excellent Nikkor 10.5 f2.8
Oct 5 2010 8:46AM
0 0
profile picture
skinnylove
Posts: 6807 - Karma: 167
f/4 stinks.
Oct 5 2010 11:31AM
0 0
profile picture
john7elway
Posts: 419 - Karma: 248
Meh, not stoked on the "circular" fisheye, looks as good as most trendy kid's on fb.
Oct 5 2010 11:32AM
0 0
profile picture
Aenigma
Posts: 11256 - Karma: 424
You're not going to get much isolation shooting that wide anyway, so 2.8 would really only give you a speed advantage.
Oct 5 2010 2:33PM
0 0
profile picture
RileySnyderPhoto
Posts: 688 - Karma: 1,451
Exactly why I'm sticking with the Sigma 10mm f/2.8. speed helps
Oct 5 2010 3:04PM
0 0
profile picture
skinnylove
Posts: 6807 - Karma: 167
That's what I mean. If I'm going to be paying $1000+ for a fisheye/wide angle I would want it to be pretty quick.
Oct 5 2010 3:14PM
0 0
profile picture
Strobe
Posts: 279 - Karma: 8
they are stopping the 15 2.8? Fuck I got to get my hands on one quick then, its on my list
Oct 5 2010 3:37PM
0 0
profile picture
Balto
Posts: 25985 - Karma: 4,398
do want
Oct 5 2010 8:23PM
0 0
profile picture
SeanTom
Posts: 7936 - Karma: 1,747
Looks cool but i dunno, for a fisheye i'd rather just have the 2.8 with a fixed focal length. Personal opinion. also i think i read somewhere it was going to retail at $1300 or something like that
Oct 5 2010 11:50PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)