Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Ski sizing rule??

profile picture
Baskin.
Posts: 1387 - Karma: 13
I know it's a generalization but do u think it is a bad idea to buy skis that are taller than you?is that just to much ski to handle?

im 5 6" which is about 168 cm. is geting a 178 anthem a bad choice?
Sep 10 2010 11:08PM
0 0
profile picture
585.
Posts: 4059 - Karma: 77
the longer the ski the more stability you will have
Sep 10 2010 11:21PM
0 0
profile picture
AJizzle
Posts: 1882 - Karma: 522
Post what type of skier u are, and what the main use of the ski is; ie. If u charge, only hit jumps and want a ski that will somewhat float, plus ur looking at growing its probably not a bad idea, but if ur looking for a rails only ski and u don't ever ski pow, and don't ski hard its probably a horrible idea, but in my experience, if ur considering going with a ski that a lot of people would say was too long for u, its probably about the right size. At least it will force u to either become a better skier, or be hopelessly out of controll all the time...lol
Sep 10 2010 11:23PM
0 0
profile picture
AJizzle
Posts: 1882 - Karma: 522
Its def, more about weight and skier ability
Sep 10 2010 11:24PM
0 0
profile picture
c4t_l0ver
Posts: 5485 - Karma: 810
5'8 with 179's. park and pow.
Sep 10 2010 11:40PM
0 0
profile picture
Baskin.
Posts: 1387 - Karma: 13
ok so im about 140 lbs.
east coast so im a rail and jib skier but im trying to improve my jump game.I ski the pow when i can....i ski very frequently so im pretty sure i can adjust to the ski size

i just feel like im at the point where i should start riding some bigger skis to make me a better skier because even though its more to handle there are definitly benefits
Sep 11 2010 12:10AM
0 0
profile picture
Taylor_A
Posts: 529 - Karma: 4
1. rails are the same as jib
2. id say like a 174 ski for u cause im 5'8'' and i have 176
Sep 11 2010 12:43AM
0 0
profile picture
Baskin.
Posts: 1387 - Karma: 13
Rails ARE jibs but jibs can be basically anything besides snow
taps,boxes,wallrides,anything creative

ND THEY ONLY COME IN 171 OR 178
Sep 11 2010 12:48AM
0 0
profile picture
Taylor_A
Posts: 529 - Karma: 4
i know thats wut i was saying and get a diff ski unless u absoluty cant, maybe afterbang or the crytonite
Sep 11 2010 12:59AM
0 0
profile picture
the604
Posts: 1067 - Karma: 10
skis dont know how tall you are, they know how heavy you are, buy based on your weight, because they will control better to your weight, tis how theyre made
Sep 11 2010 3:00AM
0 0
profile picture
Bonobo
Posts: 437 - Karma: 11
the longer your skis are, the more stability you have when charging and you are less likely to wash out on imperfect landings.
plus, you dont look like a snowblader dumbass.
buuuttttt....
having to handle that much ski will take getting used to, but in the end will make you a better skiier.

I think that as long as you think you can handle them (and you weigh enough), get 178's
Sep 11 2010 3:17AM
0 0
profile picture
niklasturku
Posts: 135 - Karma: 475
i'm 5'8-5'9(176cm) will the K2 domain 179cm be too long or perfect? I've been skiing with 173cm punx's
Sep 11 2010 5:15AM
0 0
profile picture
DHogg
Posts: 3462 - Karma: 234
Depends on many things such as:
-Height/Weight
-Skier ability
-Type of terrain you ski
-Ski flex
-Twin tip/ flat tail
-Mount position

Sep 11 2010 5:19AM
0 0
profile picture
DUKES
Posts: 5149 - Karma: 686
well k2s skis are usually 3cm longer than what they say they are so yeah they will be a bit longer but the rocker will make the skis ride shorter so yeah you should be fine
Sep 11 2010 8:34AM
0 0
profile picture
Baskin.
Posts: 1387 - Karma: 13
i see where your coming from,if i get em im going to have to adjust to them 1 way or another
idk coming off a 160 and being a rail skier im not sure 178 is right for me
Sep 11 2010 10:18AM
0 0
profile picture
Bonobo
Posts: 437 - Karma: 11
If your worried about being slowed down on rails by too much ski, then go ahead and stay in the 160's, just keep in mind though that if you go too short, you lose some balance on rails.
But really, it all depends on your personal preference and what you will be using the ski for.
Sep 11 2010 12:56PM
0 0
profile picture
Baskin.
Posts: 1387 - Karma: 13
im looking at 171's
Sep 11 2010 1:53PM
0 0
profile picture
Bonobo
Posts: 437 - Karma: 11
oh dude go for it. I used to have this years anthems in 171, they'll be great for rails and progressing your jump game.
Sep 11 2010 1:57PM
0 0
profile picture
Baskin.
Posts: 1387 - Karma: 13
fuck...they only have 178's left and im getting getting a killer deal
its either get the 178's for 250$
or pay a lot more for the 171's online
Sep 11 2010 8:15PM
0 0
profile picture
^BEANS^
Posts: 624 - Karma: 248
hight: 5foot 3inches
weight:130
skiing: 80% park 20%mtn
i'm thinking about buying the rossignol s3(09-10) in 168. how much will rocker effect how long the ski feels when riding?
Sep 11 2010 8:31PM
0 0
profile picture
Bonobo
Posts: 437 - Karma: 11
yeah i don't know about that one..
do your new skis have to be anthems?
Sep 11 2010 10:33PM
0 0
profile picture
Myfirstname.
Posts: 1581 - Karma: 312
If you haven't already, go with 178 for sure.

Lines measure closer to 174, along with the center mount. You will be fine. Seriously.
Sep 11 2010 10:59PM
0 0
profile picture
Baskin.
Posts: 1387 - Karma: 13
ok thanks dude the fact that they are actually a bit shorter has convinced me to get the 178
Sep 11 2010 11:52PM
0 0
profile picture
Bonobo
Posts: 437 - Karma: 11
nice, anthems are great skis
Sep 11 2010 11:54PM
0 0
profile picture
Baskin.
Posts: 1387 - Karma: 13
im stoked, coming off of some pretty beat skis
Sep 12 2010 12:12AM
0 0
profile picture
AJizzle
Posts: 1882 - Karma: 522
Def go with the 178, ur gonna have a ton of fun. Soo many benefits to longer skis, more stability, pop, just all around a good idea
Sep 12 2010 12:35AM
0 0
profile picture
Bonobo
Posts: 437 - Karma: 11
i think he said something about wanting to get better at jumps too, 178s will help him a lot with that
Sep 12 2010 1:05AM
0 0
profile picture
Baskin.
Posts: 1387 - Karma: 13
yessir
Sep 12 2010 12:13PM
0 0
profile picture
meeesh
Posts: 353 - Karma: 56

Rocker will put your contact points closer to your feet, making it ski shorter. On an S3 2010 has rocker in the tip but not a ridic amount and still has camber under foot, you probably won't notice it at all.

Original Post: I'm 5'4" and under 120lbs. I ski 167 in the park and 175 all mountain. If I read correctly, moving up from a 160? I think you're going to laugh at a 160 after you try something else :)

Sep 12 2010 1:49PM
0 0
profile picture
Mr_pretzel
Posts: 4616 - Karma: 1,289
Rule, if it sounds to big it probably is.
Sep 12 2010 1:50PM
0 0
profile picture
Baskin.
Posts: 1387 - Karma: 13
does it sound too big to you?.....
Sep 12 2010 7:11PM
0 0
profile picture
ReetsAdeets
Posts: 1531 - Karma: 611
Im 5'7ish and ski 184s and 181s. Youll adjust, and if theyre center mounted, they will still feel pretty short.
Sep 12 2010 7:23PM
0 0
profile picture
Mr_pretzel
Posts: 4616 - Karma: 1,289
i would suggest something a little shorter maybe a 173.
Sep 13 2010 2:11AM
0 0
profile picture
Baskin.
Posts: 1387 - Karma: 13
im not going to stress over an extra 2 cm on each side of my skis

last minute advice yes or no????
Sep 13 2010 3:06PM
0 0
profile picture
AJizzle
Posts: 1882 - Karma: 522
Doooo ittttttt
Sep 13 2010 3:28PM
0 0
profile picture
Baskin.
Posts: 1387 - Karma: 13
ok
Sep 13 2010 3:29PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)