Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Anyone interested in a 191cm park ski?

profile picture
iggyskier
Posts: 10434 - Karma: 9,753
Been meaning to put this thread up for awhile.  I know there has long been talk of someone making a long park ski for you crazy tall kids.  Well....if you want it, I will build it for you for next season.  I just need to be convinced I am not going to get left high and drive with a bunch of 191cm blue steeles or jeronimos (as the short kids left us this year with our 171cm skis =0).

so if you ware interested, post it up.  There is a number we basically need to reach to make it possible materials wise, but figured I would get the interest going.

A 191cm jeronimo is where I would be leaning, but if there was enough interest in a true 191cm symmetrical park ski - a la blue steele, I would be happy to make it for you guys.

post up here if you are at all interested.  If there is no interest, then sadly I will just focus more on more human sizes.  So if you want it, make it happen!
Feb 7 2010 6:27PM
4 1
profile picture
Deletedtoday
Posts: 4060 - Karma: 398
just go 175, 181 and 186
Feb 7 2010 6:41PM
2 0
profile picture
iggyskier
Posts: 10434 - Karma: 9,753
I would be open to something like that too.  I guess I just wanted to see.  I've talked to a few people who've asked for a straight up 191cm park ski, so just gauging interest for now.
Feb 7 2010 6:42PM
0 0
profile picture
phishfood
Posts: 2542 - Karma: 298
i definitely appreciate the interest- no other company has done that really. i'm 6'3'', so not super tall and i've been really happy on some 185 walls this season. unfortunately also i just got a pair of really cheap skis for next year as well, so i can't say i'd buy a pair next season.

but yah see what this thread brings in. if you were to make a 191 85 waist park ski you would be the first company to do so. maybe email some of the people who purchased 181s and ask what they would think about a longer version of the ski?

also IMO, keep the tail/tip nice and low profile and skis are lighter, and look longer/better.

Feb 7 2010 6:54PM
0 0
profile picture
psychkub
Posts: 1788 - Karma: 16
The only way I would want something in the 191 range is if I was planning on centermounting. I would love a park ski in the high 180s. 191 might be too much. I have really fond memories of my Chronic Wide 187s. I am 6'2" 240lbs and that was the perfect park length ski for me.

If you have like a 187 or 188 blue steele with same rocker dimensions as the blue steele, I'd be HIGHLY interested.
Feb 7 2010 8:27PM
0 0
profile picture
charmander
Posts: 10636 - Karma: 372
get all the other boards done first...

but, i know a couple kids that could bump 191 blue steeles pretty happily
Feb 7 2010 8:32PM
0 0
profile picture
Big_Spence
Posts: 16177 - Karma: 4,352
191 J-Mo's would be pretty sick.
But I have to agree with Derek, nothing over a 186. I would but that though.
Feb 7 2010 8:34PM
0 0
profile picture
carbon.pulse
Posts: 3348 - Karma: 22
I want a 210 C+D with knives on the tips.....
Feb 7 2010 8:38PM
1 1
profile picture
Legion
Posts: 1374 - Karma: 29
a 185/186 blue steele would be sick, i would definitely consider it
Feb 7 2010 8:45PM
0 0
profile picture
_Alex_
Posts: 160 - Karma: 31
I'm 6'7 and pretty much all park skis feel super short. Sign me up.
Feb 7 2010 8:50PM
1 0
profile picture
MayorWest
Posts: 1596 - Karma: 160
175/181/186
this would be ideal!
i would most definatly buy a 186 but id say 181 would be a bit much. and volkl is the only brand thats got a 185 so with you guys having a 186 it would fill the market real nice and im sure plenty would sell
Feb 7 2010 9:21PM
0 0
profile picture
iggyskier
Posts: 10434 - Karma: 9,753
It should be noted, too, we measure final not flat material length.

So our 181cm is similar to most companies 184cm.
Feb 7 2010 9:23PM
0 0
profile picture
charmander
Posts: 10636 - Karma: 372
and rockets
Feb 7 2010 9:33PM
0 0
profile picture
Deletedtoday
Posts: 4060 - Karma: 398
even a better reason for the 186
Feb 7 2010 9:52PM
0 0
profile picture
Literature
Posts: 13673 - Karma: 3,086
Ha. No park feature would be left standing.
Feb 7 2010 9:54PM
0 0
profile picture
Balto
Posts: 25985 - Karma: 4,398
i to am going to agree with derek on the 186 max for BSs, but a 191 j-mo would help draw people who are on 189 seths over i think
Feb 7 2010 10:18PM
0 0
profile picture
skibikeclambake
Posts: 2346 - Karma: 27
191 JERONIMO
Feb 7 2010 10:21PM
0 0
profile picture
Deletedtoday
Posts: 4060 - Karma: 398
never thought id hear that come out of you hah
Feb 7 2010 10:29PM
0 0
profile picture
Yung_Gnarley
Posts: 9091 - Karma: 3,016
please...
Dec 25 2013 2:40PM
0 0
profile picture
wasatch_rat
Posts: 1771 - Karma: 2,937
6'3" here and i would love bigger park skis. almost all park skis stop between 179-181, but a 186 would be perfect for me but i'm sure there's others out there who would appreciate a 191 as well
Dec 25 2013 5:01PM
0 0
profile picture
Tucks
Posts: 2120 - Karma: 161
I would be interested but a 187/189 would probably be sufficient. A fully symmetrical long park skis would be a great idea though
Dec 25 2013 6:17PM
0 0
profile picture
SEABURN
Posts: 4859 - Karma: 2,751
!!! this.
Dec 25 2013 6:23PM
0 0
profile picture
Shifties4Dayz
Posts: 1657 - Karma: 553
A 188-190 jmo would be the BESTthing ever to happen
Dec 25 2013 8:15PM
0 0
profile picture
AJizzle
Posts: 1882 - Karma: 522
I have never skied an on3p ski, but am a firm supporter of the 187+ skis, and if I were to buy an on3p of any type it would most likely be in the longest length possible.
Dec 25 2013 10:03PM
0 0
profile picture
blindside
Posts: 5619 - Karma: 1,199
Soft, mid-fat, zero camber, symmetrical rocker, 191. I will buy this.
Dec 26 2013 1:30AM
0 0
profile picture
srg_bchkv
Posts: 200 - Karma: 170
I'd buy this too. In a shorter size, I'm not tall. But I'd really like a soft symmetrical rockered ski from on3p.
Dec 26 2013 2:53AM
0 0
profile picture
ggfski42
Posts: 651 - Karma: 700
If you make 191 JMO's I will purchase them. I loved my 186's but sold them and regretted it ever since.
Dec 26 2013 8:55AM
0 0
profile picture
Thadius.Castle
Posts: 1436 - Karma: 250
If I could afford FR's, sure. I'm 6'4 so I'd ride 191's. But I can't afford the alas, so my opinion doesn't matter.
Dec 26 2013 9:39AM
0 0
profile picture
k2andcannoli
Posts: 644 - Karma: -36
I have old k2 piste pipe tele twintips mounted with fks 15's, they claim 189cm which is actually 194cm. I fucking love them!

So yes go big or go home...if u make em, we'll buy em.
Dec 26 2013 11:16AM
0 0
profile picture
haggis_hunter
Posts: 399 - Karma: 207
191 JMOs would make me happy, and not left buying a 190 SFB, Id like something that suits my height and weight to have fun on.
Dec 28 2013 6:41AM
0 0
profile picture
HolySchimmel
Posts: 1601 - Karma: 1,297
Would love a ski slightly bigger than the 1,85m that are around everywhere. 191 would be more or less perfect for me
Dec 28 2013 9:56AM
0 0
profile picture
haggis_hunter
Posts: 399 - Karma: 207
Actually a 191 Jeffry would be even more ideal
Dec 28 2013 12:13PM
0 0
profile picture
AJizzle
Posts: 1882 - Karma: 522
My current all-mtn/park ski is the 188 ARVti and 192 tst. I have 190 magic j's, 192 solly rocker and 196 blizzard bodacious, we'll buy me for sure.
Dec 28 2013 3:43PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)