I am just curious how judging works. It seems to me that it seems to be a little to subjective. For example Dumont's snow basin pipe runs. His second run appeared to be worse then his first and some how he managed to score better on the second. It seems that they aren't using a good system if things like that happen.
So basically i'm wondering if there is a system for judging or the judges just give a score that they feel is appropriate. Because if you ask me the current way isn't working very well.
Im also wondering what would it take to reform the way it works, because it seems a lot of people don't agree with the way it is. I know not everyone is going to be happy with the judging but there must be a better way then the current one.