Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
Check TGR, they have more detailed reviews. The CRJ has gotten great reviews as a ski with a jib feel. The EHP has gotten great reviews as a ski you can smear like a reverse sidecut ski or turn like a normal sidecut ski. The 186 will ski as short as you want it to without working very hard..
The CRJ was designed with more switch riding in mind and playing around in pow(not saying it can't ski hard though, just saying what it's design was made for), where the EHP was designed as a ski that Eric H. could make any turn shape he wants(smearing or cutting) while skiing all types of billy goat lines and open faces, and went through a ton of protos(the CRJ went through a decent amount too but nowhere close to as many as the EHP).
And like I said above, for powder and crud skiing, the EHP rocker shape slices perfect smooth turns, where the normal tip at the end of the CRJ gets tossed around more.
Here ya go, a 145lb guy talking about the 193s: http://www.tetongravity.com/forums/showthread.php?t=73644
And a 186 review: http://www.tetongravity.com/forums/showthread.php?t=108404
I'd think you would be fine on a pair of 193s even..but I do like loner skis. When I was about to get a pair of 193s in November I ran into a pair of 202 Lotus 138s(with holes already put in for large dukes at -1) for about $80 more, which I couldn't put down.
The rocker(and flat underfoot) and especially taper are going to make them turn easily.
According to 4FRNTs site, 186 EHPs are 10.4lbs/pair and 188 CRJs are also 10.4lbs/pair. CRJs aren't on the lighter side of pow jib skis, but they're not too far from the middle(179 bents being 11.2, EPs being 10.1ish, 189 LL2s being 9.2, Chetlers being about the same as CRJs I think and JJs being 9.5ish).
I'd guess that if he is mounting just one pair of skis with AT bindings, and is deciding between EHPs and CRJs, he is probably touring for powder runs. IMO, rockered(but not truely reverse camber) skis tour better in powder(even if you're on somebody elses track on a soft day) then normal camber skis. The normal camber of Coombas(which have a larger than normal tip) dug the tip in while touring a bit, and on one of the BD skis(i don't remember which, rockered tip and flat underfoot though) I felt the rocker and flat camber kept the ski gliding over the snow better. On bullet proof days touring with camber would be better though(but all I tour for is powder and warmer spring conditions).
...you dont happen to know niall motson do you?
im his friend tyler, i came up and stayed with him a few times