Line Cronics?? I say so

the kung fujas were my first thought. 
are you expecting any kind of performance in pow?

the chronics are a sick ski but they dont really have the girth for powder. well just remembered about the chronic kryptonite, i would recommend that. its a little fatter then the regular chronic and i think it would suit you better for 70/30 allmtn/park

not really any super performance, My skis now are only 76 underfoot and cronics are 80something so anything would be an upgrade really.

how do you feel about the volkl bridge?

If you are a good enough skiier you can ski powder on anything ( im not bagiin on fat skis cause i have some im just sayin) fat skis just make it eaisier

truth

164cm K2 Extremes

Of all the skis being talked about in this thread the prophets are probably the best, but can you really lose? I mean there are probably 20 comapnies that make a ski that will do what you need it to, and do it very well. I wouldn't agonize over it too much, just find one of these many, many skis you like the look of, in a reasonable price range, from a company you want to support (that last one is very important) and go with that. Odds are, you'll be happiest with the choice that way, not if someone else talks you into something.

look in to the ar6...

Seems lime you've done a decent amount of research and looking, which is something mroe people should do. That's better than "wat r teh best park skiz."

Anyway, I put my vote in for the chronics. I have 07-08s, the orange ones, and they are awesome. I pretty much ride more outside the park then in it, and they kill the entire mountain. I know how to ski outside the park very well, but my park riding is limited to 180s, 360s and other basic stuff right now. Since I'm in New Jersey, i can say they ski ice rather well and they kill slush/whatever else we get too. I'm 5'4 116lbs and ride 166cm for reference. They were/are my first pair of twins too. They aren't really soft, although coming from carver ski that i would assume is very stiff comapred to any park oriented twin, they'll feel softer. Everybody on here will say they are super stiff, but that's probably becuase half of them ride invaders (very soft) They are playful though, I can feel the energy store up an rebound in the tails going over rollers and such. They are super fun on ramps, i'm kinda bad at rails so i can't exactly speak for the preformance their. You can't really loose whith most of the choices you have, I don't know how the snow is in CT, the prophet 90s may be good if it actually snows there too. I saw some guy skiing slush and crap on those and he blew through everything. They don't seem much like a park ski though.

I'd say get chronics, hope that helped. I have salomon z10s on mine since they are pretty light, I don't know much about bindings though so i'll stop here.

Honestly I consider Chronics a park ski regardless of how they're marketed. That's not to say you can't ride them everywhere nut you can do that on almost any ski out there (Even invaders if you're determined). It's important to remember that until recently a 90mm waist ski was considered a fat ski. It's all about where you mount them. Obviously the closer to center the harder they'll be to ski in powder but the better they'll be in the park. But of all the skis you've mentioned I think you'd be happiest with the Fujas if you're planning on mounting close to center and skiing powder at all. But if your looking for a stiffer park ski that wont cost too much and that isn't intended to be center mounted I'd say the chronics may be the right ski for you. You might also wanna check out the ARV's or Alpha 2's (for the rocker) by Armada. As far as I'm concerned Armada makes one of the best skis out there and you definitely won't be disappointed at all with any ski you get from them.

Not to threadjack, but he^ is right, you can ski any ski anywhere. I'm taking my chronics to colorado at one point this year, and i hope i get to ski some pow on them. I've never skied a fat ski, and i think i've only ski real pow once at loveland, and i did it on rental skis that had to beunder 80mm in the waist.

Armadas are good though, i used some ar6s once and they were super fun too, very light and very poppy.

this. they are gonna be way better than the kung fujas and honestly id say the fujas are too wide and heavy for a beginner to learn park. the extremes have a huge big shovel so they will go through pow well depending on your mount and they kill it in the trees. i have p.e.s which are the same ski and they were fun except i had them mounted 6 or 7 back(i had no clue what i was doing). get em 2 or 3 back and youll love em. as far as size the 164 or 159 would suit

It's the Chronic yo!

truth ive skied my invaders in heavy ass waist deep pnw powder and tthey were fine

line chronic kryptonites. they're stiff and will ride similarly to the volkl's you have now. they are plenty wide for anything and kick lots of ass. you cannot possibly be disappointed with them.