Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Armada alpha 1 mounting

profile picture
MNBlake
Posts: 658 - Karma: 32
so i just got some armada alpha ones, and the factory reccommended is -2.5, but im considering mounting them at true center since im in minnesota and i really can't do much "all mountain" skiing.

opinions on this?
Jul 24 2009 4:45PM
1 0
profile picture
TastyZ
Posts: 491 - Karma: 45

How much park do u ski?

Jul 24 2009 4:46PM
0 0
profile picture
MNBlake
Posts: 658 - Karma: 32
ALOT. Im there almost 95% of my minnesota riding. i also do some urban stuff and i dont wanna have my weight all messed up.
Jul 24 2009 4:51PM
0 0
profile picture
iFail
Posts: 2066 - Karma: 65
2.5 back doesn't matter for swing weight.  Think about it, your heel piece always ways much more than toe, your body weight is behind your boot midsole, etc., so from -1.5 to -2 I would say.  I guess center wouldn't be too bad on these like it is on many park skis, though, do they have equal tip and tail rocker?  I fondled a pair and now want to try them(but I can just use my LL2s in park when I want a rockered ski and PCs when I don't, so I won't buy them.)
Jul 24 2009 5:00PM
0 0
profile picture
Lemuel
Posts: 14477 - Karma: 10,515
2.5 Back will definitely make a difference for swing weight.  It will not be much, but it will be noticeable.  And the weight of the heel piece is not going to make a difference, it is so close to your foot that it will not be noticeable.  click into your ski and see if it tips back because your heel piece weighs more, it won't. 
Jul 24 2009 5:09PM
0 0
profile picture
iFail
Posts: 2066 - Karma: 65

the main guys in Armadas crew do not have park skis mounted center.  It may make a small difference, but I still think -1.5 to -2.5 is best for anything except rails.  The farthest forward I was told about on PCs was -1.5 for Tanner, and -2 to -3 for others.

Jul 24 2009 5:15PM
0 0
profile picture
fLyInG-liNeS
Posts: 1562 - Karma: 223
my alpha 1's are at center
Jul 24 2009 5:22PM
0 0
profile picture
iFail
Posts: 2066 - Karma: 65
and..?  you have to comment on how they ski like that. ever skied them anywhere else?
Jul 24 2009 5:38PM
0 0
profile picture
fLyInG-liNeS
Posts: 1562 - Karma: 223
i haven't got to ski them yet
Jul 24 2009 5:38PM
0 0
profile picture
Balto
Posts: 25985 - Karma: 4,398
due to the fact that in a normal stance you are leaning forward a little and while skiing you want to be in an anthletic stance so you will be putting more weight on your toes not your heels, mount em center
Jul 24 2009 5:50PM
0 0
profile picture
MNBlake
Posts: 658 - Karma: 32
yeah i mean my last ski was an invader, and of course they are a true twin and factory recommended for center, but. i loved centered skis.. i mean is there any real advantage to mounting them back in terms of park? i can't think of any
Jul 24 2009 6:22PM
0 0
profile picture
Balto
Posts: 25985 - Karma: 4,398
more nose for presses/butters?
Jul 24 2009 6:26PM
0 0
profile picture
Twinjibber77
Posts: 6239 - Karma: 2,356
I'd go for -2. But i do that with every park ski.
Jul 24 2009 7:50PM
0 0
profile picture
MNBlake
Posts: 658 - Karma: 32
yeah but you'd need even more weight to get that same butter since your farther back, i feel like the two would just cancel each other out?
Jul 24 2009 8:59PM
0 0
profile picture
MNBlake
Posts: 658 - Karma: 32
thought id dust this thread off... anyone else got any suggestions on this?
thanks for the help
Oct 23 2009 2:06PM
0 0
profile picture
snomaster
Posts: 3336 - Karma: 5,677
-1.5 for Tanner...
Oct 23 2009 2:36PM
0 0
profile picture
buckers
Posts: 448 - Karma: 12
+1 if you wanna get real dirty.
Oct 23 2009 2:39PM
0 0
profile picture
MNBlake
Posts: 658 - Karma: 32
haha i like how you think my friend
Oct 24 2009 1:01AM
0 0
profile picture
PaleCelery
Posts: 7228 - Karma: 608
at lest -15.  Maybe as far back as -20 for all mountain.
Oct 24 2009 1:50AM
0 0
profile picture
stuff
Posts: 53 - Karma: 56
Thing is that tip and tail rockers aren't quite equal on Alphas, so i measured my 182s and figured out, that recommended mounting point at -2,5 is recommended for a reason - it's just an actual center of the ski running length or whatever it's called. So it was actually between -2,5 or -5 for me since i don't really want tails that long (longer then tips) and i went -2,5 for tips of these skis appeared to be quite a bit stiffer than i expected, so they won't wash out on switch landings.
So i'd say it's either -2,5 for park or -5 for AM if you ever decide to ride these all mountain.
Hope that helps.
Oct 24 2009 6:33AM
1 0
All times are Eastern (-4)