Harry Potter 6 Harry is missing his scar???

deleted5

Posts: 14507 - Karma: 13,500

Karma: 13,500

Posts: 14507

Crazy Fool

be like me. just don't see it

Jul 17 2009 2:12AM

0 0

Brian.

Posts: 466 - Karma: 210

Karma: 210

Posts: 466

Ridiculous

agreed if anyone is planning to watch it don't.... it was a waste of time and money

Jul 17 2009 2:14AM

0 0

spliff.Life

Posts: 7847 - Karma: 1,549

Karma: 1,549

Posts: 7847

Crazy Fool

i thought it was bomb, and he had his scar the entire movie.....

anyone who doesnt like hp can eat some smelly poop!!!

Jul 17 2009 2:16AM

0 0

WytePwrRnger007

Posts: 281 - Karma: 40

Karma: 40

Posts: 281

Loner

yeah it was def there

Jul 17 2009 2:17AM

0 0

deleted5

Posts: 14507 - Karma: 13,500

Karma: 13,500

Posts: 14507

Crazy Fool

k as long as I don't see it that's fine with me

Jul 17 2009 2:17AM

0 0

Brian.

Posts: 466 - Karma: 210

Karma: 210

Posts: 466

Ridiculous

haha i love HP im a huge fan movies are a disappointment though...
and i was talking about it with friends half the time his scar was defs not there

Jul 17 2009 2:21AM

0 0

Funnel

Posts: 7808 - Karma: 1,414

Karma: 1,414

Posts: 7808

Crazy Fool

I would so go and see this movie. Too bad I never go to the movies.

Jul 17 2009 2:45AM

0 0

PattyFow

Posts: 540 - Karma: 51

Karma: 51

Posts: 540

Ridiculous

i read the books, and thats all the harry potter i need in my life. movies are just a waste of my time and money when i could be doing shit outside.

Jul 17 2009 3:12AM

0 0

RRhighrider

Posts: 2137 - Karma: 1,105

Karma: 1,105

Posts: 2137

Addict

you are very wise. i love the books but the movies are always disappointing

Jul 17 2009 4:10AM

0 0

polso

Posts: 201 - Karma: 6

Karma: 6

Posts: 201

Loner

i liked it. to much emphasis on the relationships, that aside i thought it was good!

Jul 17 2009 4:37AM

0 0

7-3instacall

Posts: 999 - Karma: 1,005

Karma: 1,005

Posts: 999

Insane

édidn't like the movie really, it was a cool movie but not good enough to fit my harry potter 6 demands. I mean, Even Dumbledore's sizzurp wasn't green,,,,wtf

Jul 17 2009 12:10PM

0 0

gwhitey

Posts: 2249 - Karma: 312

Karma: 312

Posts: 2249

Addict

suked ballsssss. i was goin to c public enemies but all my friends went to go c potter so i went with them. suchhh a waste of time. any one c public enemies, i want to

Jul 17 2009 12:21PM

0 0

WytePwrRnger007

Posts: 281 - Karma: 40

Karma: 40

Posts: 281

Loner

i heard public enemies sucked too...sooo

Jul 17 2009 12:44PM

0 0

ARSpickert

Posts: 533 - Karma: 25

Karma: 25

Posts: 533

Ridiculous

I thought Harry Potter and Public Enemies were both dope. I guess I'm the only one though...

Jul 17 2009 1:04PM

0 0

yourthemannowdog

Posts: 4541 - Karma: 313

Karma: 313

Posts: 4541

No Life

did anyone notice all the drug references in the movie besides me?

Jul 17 2009 1:34PM

0 0

awsomebob69

Posts: 408 - Karma: 12

Karma: 12

Posts: 408

Ridiculous

movie wasnt bad, but easily could have been better. the 6th book was really good thats why the movie was but it was actually poorly acted and way to corny. and in the end there was supposed to be an all out battle where George dies and lupin dies. but w/e. ide give it a 6 out of 10

Jul 17 2009 1:37PM

0 0

Kajex

Posts: 1069 - Karma: 178

Karma: 178

Posts: 1069

Insane

public enemies wasnt horrible, but wen i saw the preview i thought it was gonna be so much more epic. watch the rotten tomatoes review of it, they pretty much describe it perfectly.

Jul 17 2009 1:46PM

0 0

cashdebt

Posts: 2383 - Karma: 349

Karma: 349

Posts: 2383

Addict

meh, lord of the rings kicked ass in both movie form and book form, harry potter though has not been to incredible in the cinema

Jul 17 2009 1:54PM

0 0

babujib

Posts: 5039 - Karma: 104

Karma: 104

Posts: 5039

No Life

i fell asleep during it. but im surprised more parents arent pissed because all they did was get hammered and get high off "potions."

Jul 17 2009 2:21PM

0 0

KellyK

Posts: 1781 - Karma: 706

Karma: 706

Posts: 1781

Insane

to be fair, its a tough book to translate into a movie. if they'd done them right it probably would have taken at least 30 years to make all 7.

Jul 17 2009 2:24PM

0 0

Brian.

Posts: 466 - Karma: 210

Karma: 210

Posts: 466

Ridiculous

i would've waited that long to see a good HP movie....
they missed out all the important parts of the movie like the big battle at the end and lupin and others dying...
yet they put so much attention into unneccesary stuff like ron making the team and relationships and stuff.. the movie was wayyyyyyyyy too cheesy the whole time... the first HP movie was probably the best one that actually made the movie seem like the book. Other movies they cut out too much like 5th book quidditch wasn't even mentioned. Id rather pay more money to go watch a full like 5 hour movie with every detail of the book in the movie

Jul 17 2009 2:30PM

0 0

KellyK

Posts: 1781 - Karma: 706

Karma: 706

Posts: 1781

Insane

nobody but dumbledore dies in this book. pretty sure lupin dies at the end of the last book. but they did leave out the entire big battle which was wierd. that's something people would really want to see, i mean its basically the climax to the whole movie. but i do see what you're saying here. its super jumpy, like they just go from one point to the next and it follows no logical path. like they'll be playing quidditch, and the next scene its the middle of winter. no transition at all.

Jul 17 2009 2:45PM

0 0

steezeandskis

Posts: 646 - Karma: 21

Karma: 21

Posts: 646

Ridiculous

hmmm two hour movie or 30 hours reading the book.. or 10 bucks for a movie ticket or 20 for the book. care to rethink your argument?

Jul 17 2009 2:47PM

0 0

Jamestown

Posts: 4002 - Karma: 51

Karma: 51

Posts: 4002

No Life

haha yeah
the luck syrum=E
love potion=weed
and hermione got hammered at the 3 broomsticks

Jul 17 2009 3:52PM

0 0

JstHuckIt

Posts: 422 - Karma: 16

Karma: 16

Posts: 422

Ridiculous

They made Dumbledore obviously Gay in this one too...I just go for the cinematography...I really like it. And yes I noticed all of the references.

Jul 17 2009 4:00PM

0 0

r0dubs

Posts: 1764 - Karma: 19

Karma: 19

Posts: 1764

Insane

hah

Jul 17 2009 4:05PM

0 0

Robert.T

Posts: 230 - Karma: 230

Karma: 230

Posts: 230

Loner

I liked the movie. It was entertaining and did exactly what it said it would do. The credits say "Based on the book". I don't think they set out to make an exact copy. I found it to be a very funny and entertaining movie.

Jul 17 2009 4:12PM

0 0

Robert.T

Posts: 230 - Karma: 230

Karma: 230

Posts: 230

Loner

And since everyone is upset about the exclusion of the end battle scene, here are the reasons... Brian, you might be interested in this article: http://www.aceshowbiz.com/news/view/00018462.html

Jul 17 2009 4:20PM

0 0

doublexl

Posts: 8407 - Karma: 26

Karma: 26

Posts: 8407

Crazy Fool

ignant. that was ignant on like 5 levels.

Jul 17 2009 4:26PM

0 0

FoxtrotSport

Posts: 162 - Karma: 23

Karma: 23

Posts: 162

Pro

Woah woah woah, you guys say this one was cheesy? Go watch the end of the first movie and tell me again what cheesy is.

The 6th one wasn't cheesy, it was just centered on relationship and getting fucked up on potions and butterbeer instead of SNAPE KILLING DUMBLEDORE

Jul 17 2009 4:35PM

0 0

k-rob

Posts: 14217 - Karma: 2,891

Karma: 2,891

Posts: 14217

Crazy Fool

30 hours? holy balls i don't think i've ever met anybody who reads that slowly.

Jul 17 2009 5:07PM

0 0

steezeandskis

Posts: 646 - Karma: 21

Karma: 21

Posts: 646

Ridiculous

i dont fucking know how long it took, i obviously didnt read the book

Jul 17 2009 5:20PM

0 0

DouglasFRESH

Posts: 164 - Karma: 329

Karma: 329

Posts: 164

Pro

you havent met me.

oh you think the book was better? know what i liked about the movie? no reading.

Jul 17 2009 7:20PM

0 0

SkiAlyeska

Posts: 100 - Karma: 20

Karma: 20

Posts: 100

Pro

i noticed that too! the only time you see it is when hes showing it to someone- i don't remember who...
i thought it was pretty good even tho i feel asleep hahahaha i was just really tired. i woke up when everyone in the theater screamed haha

Jul 17 2009 7:22PM

0 0

grams.

Posts: 7406 - Karma: 186

Karma: 186

Posts: 7406

Crazy Fool

I've never read any of the books, saw the last movie, but I'm not into harry potter at all. I went to the midnight showing with this girl and her brother dressed up as Harry as a joke. The near 1000 people outside of the theater were all cheering for us while he rode his broom around, it was legit. I thought the movie sucked, but then again I'm just not into wizards and crap.

Jul 17 2009 7:29PM

0 0

SkiAlyeska

Posts: 100 - Karma: 20

Karma: 20

Posts: 100

Pro

/\ that's so legit! sounds like fun hahaha. i love doing shenanigans like that

Jul 17 2009 7:36PM

0 0

fappy

Posts: 2960 - Karma: 15

Karma: 15

Posts: 2960

Addict

that's because you're a mindless little shit who has to be entertained like a 4-year old by moving pictures.

Jul 17 2009 8:01PM

0 0

yourthemannowdog

Posts: 4541 - Karma: 313

Karma: 313

Posts: 4541

No Life

haha ya. This was the first movie where they are 18 so bottoms up!

Jul 17 2009 8:03PM

0 0

steezeandskis

Posts: 646 - Karma: 21

Karma: 21

Posts: 646

Ridiculous

so you dont like movies? or are you a mindless little shit who has to be entertained by moving pictures too?

Jul 17 2009 8:03PM

0 0

HR8938Cephei

Posts: 1411 - Karma: 46

Karma: 46

Posts: 1411

Insane

i thought the movie was pretty good, a little disappointing but oh well

Jul 17 2009 8:08PM

0 0

PattyFow

Posts: 540 - Karma: 51

Karma: 51

Posts: 540

Ridiculous

haha well i read before bed when i have nothing else to do. if i spend thirty hours of my time on a book, who the fuck cares, thats thirty hours i would be doing nothing anyways, and i enjoy a good book much more than a good movie. call me a nerd or whatever i dont give a fuck, but if you ever read the book fight club i think thats a good enough example. or even fear and loathing. both are good movies, but great books, so i personally would rather spend the time reading the book instead of the "convience" of a movie. and to your second point, i buy books at thrift stores. two bucks a piece, so now i already saved eight dollars, plus the food that i always end up buying, and i dont have to drive anywhere to read. the closest theatre to my house is around twenty five miles. besides, i would rather go for a fucking hike than watch a movie, or save my money for a concert. so yeah, i guess i thought about it a little.

Jul 17 2009 8:27PM

0 0