Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!
ummmm....wasn't he fount not guilty of those charges? This gives me reason to believe that he didn't molest children. if a court can't find enough evidence on a fucking superstar, that means there must not have been much evidence.
So yes, i would. But i'd make him pay. What? I'm 19 i can whore myself out if i fucking want to.
I make no claims to MJ's guilt, or innocence. The question stands as it is.
We established some pros and cons to MJ molestation. I will list them for the group
Pros: The last kid they suspected was molested got a huge out of court settlement .. bling bling. You would be famous, if only for 5 min, and not necessarily for some thing good, but famous non the less. You could probably option a book or movie deal, more bling. Neverland ranch looks like fun. He would probably teach you to moon walk.
Cons: many of these have been established by the group. A creepy grown man would be touching you. Unless your gay, or very open minded you would feel very violated and most likely have serious mental issues. The therapy and reconstructive bit hole surgery may cost more then your out of court settlement. Neverland ranch is now closed.
Your an absolute moron. yes I am serious. for the record my vote is no, I would not have let him molest me. and unless you indicate otherwise i will be marking you down as a no vote aswell. Thanks for your input.