Photo Narrative Critique HELP!!!

Alright I kind of figured it out, so they're a little bigger if you click on them

first and last are sick dude. one thing i can say about the second though... the timing is way to early...

crop does not help the second one.

need to be more photos.

no photos of skinning

non of the photos show the work involved or how early you started. the last one kinda shows the reward

for a touring photo essay I would want to see: the work involved( how early you had to get up, how hard the ascent was, the size of the mountains, ect.) the enviroment (snow conditions, the weather, the terrain), and the reward (snow quality, views, line skied).

if you really work at it I think you may be able to show all of those in one photo.

thanks for the help, if you examine the first photo I am skinning in the bottom middle...

[IMG][/IMG]

its really irrelevant if there is some one skinning up in the first shot if the viewer can't see them. For all intended purposes it is a shot of some pretty mountains, which don't say much about the skiing. 
Even if you do notice the skier they are so small you get no feel for them and the terrain they are skinning up is nothing special.

Why are you doing these supper wide horizontal crops on the skiing? It does nothing for it.

There are a ton of tracks in the skiing photos.  No one gives two shits about skiing tracked out lines.

Sure its pretty impresive that you were willing to go on a long tour for some tracked out meh, but the pictures arn't going to be very inspiring.

Show us why you were willing to get up ridiculously early and walk up a big hill covered in snow.

Last image says you were next to some mountains that alot of people had skied down.