Armada T-hall vs Head J.O Pro

Or you could just write what ever u want bout those skis

pro-hoe?

whats your height and weight? the t-halls are really soft skis, which will make them better for jibs, rails, and butters and little jumps. they're probably be a little better in powder too.

I have the T-hall's but I don't have the J.O. They are both great park skis. The t-hall will be better for rails and will go well for small jumps. The J.O Pro's are stiff so I don't know haw they will do for rails cause I already try the one's of my friend but they were way to short for me cause I don't know. But for jumps they will go great and they are stiff so you can land sw without any probleme.The t-hall's go great for jumps but if you are doing a big jump and landing sw try not to land to forwars cause they are really soft.

So all in all they are both great park skis so if you want a softer ski go with the t-hall and if you want a stiffer ski go with the J.O. Pro's.

Neither of the above posts really know what they are talking about.  I have skied both skis, and I can almost guarantee you that the JO pro is a better ski(light, poppy, sexy).  The JO pro is not stiff, it is more of an even, medium-soft flex.  I own the T-hall, and I have to say that I am not a huge fan of the ski(I bought if super cheap).  The t-hall is super soft in the tip, and mega stiff flexing behind the binding, and then tapers off with a soft flex in the tip of the tail.  It is a strange flexing ski, and really only great on rails, and smaller jumps, as stated above.  For an all around park ski, definitely go for the JO Pro, although i love armada.  The T-hall is just a really specific ski, and takes some getting used to.