Could i ride a 164?

Posts: 254 - Karma: 17

Karma: 17

Posts: 254

Loner

Hi, I'm 5 foot 4 inches or 160 centimeters, and i want to get the blue house mr 164's, but i dont know if i can handle the ski. I am pretty good. 80% park rider. 20% all mountain. In the past i used skis that were up to my nose. but i dont know what to do. and also, please give me your opinion on bluehouse mrs please. thank you. +karma for those of you who help. thanks.

Sep 27 2008 7:36PM

0 0

treemobbin

Posts: 254 - Karma: 17

Karma: 17

Posts: 254

Loner

oh, also. im 14 and i weigh 120 lbs.

Sep 27 2008 7:39PM

0 0

division.bell

Posts: 2762 - Karma: 1,905

Karma: 1,905

Posts: 2762

Addict

Where are you planning on mounting the skis? If you are looking more for a park specific mount, the extra length might benefit you with some added stability. I would go with a longer ski. It can't hurt you, especially if you will be growing into the ski. If it doesn't kill you it makes you stronger.

Sep 27 2008 8:45PM

0 0

sirskizalot

Posts: 4370 - Karma: 161

Karma: 161

Posts: 4370

No Life

164 should be fine

Sep 27 2008 8:49PM

0 0

ReedSkis~

Posts: 2122 - Karma: 98

Karma: 98

Posts: 2122

Addict

i'm around 5'4 too and i got 171 anthems... 164 would also have suited me very well
164 will be a really good size for a park/all mountain ski, but a bigger ski will last u longer
but now that i think about it u should probably just get some MRs in 164
basically a steal!

Sep 27 2008 11:08PM

0 0

powderlvr23

Posts: 163 - Karma: 11

Karma: 11

Posts: 163

Pro

if you're a stronger skier a longer length would not be a problem. better with landings for sure. def be able to bomb it if you take it all-mtn. all personal preference really. if you think you'll be comfortable with a longer ski go for it.

Sep 28 2008 12:20AM

0 0