Member of the Month

PartyBullshiit
March, 2024

Online

Welcome to the Newschoolers forums! You may read the forums as a guest, however you must be a registered member to post. Register to become a member today!

Ski lengths

profile picture
JordanClarke
Posts: 998 - Karma: 1,922
im buying the 08/09 obsethed and wondering what length to buy? I ride alot of Big Mountain and BC, and booters in the BC/park. I need something that will work good in pow, glades, BM lines, pillows, but also something i can spin on. i was thinking 189's/bindings at +3? I'm 6'3ft 170lbs. I cant decide between the 179's or the 189's? Suggestions..
Jul 27 2008 7:17PM
0 0
profile picture
Kevski
Posts: 7056 - Karma: 2,785
I'm thinking you will likely want the 189 at your height, especially because you're going to be skiing bunches of powder.
Jul 27 2008 7:21PM
0 0
profile picture
huge-go
Posts: 1451 - Karma: 33
89's no doubt.
Jul 27 2008 7:24PM
0 0
profile picture
Parker.
Posts: 1637 - Karma: 108
definitely the 189's.
Jul 27 2008 7:25PM
0 0
profile picture
ChadThundercock
Posts: 3070 - Karma: 785
for your height do the 189's
Jul 27 2008 7:43PM
0 0
profile picture
biG_EaSt
Posts: 575 - Karma: 15
if i were you id go with the 189s cause where you goin to be skiing and your size youd prolly be dissapointed with the 79's
Jul 27 2008 8:01PM
0 0
profile picture
JordanClarke
Posts: 998 - Karma: 1,922
The only concern i have with the 189's is that i like to spin alot. Ive always had smaller ski's so im hesitant to buy bigger skis and not be able to spin. If i mounted my bindings at like +4/5 would that make up for it?
Jul 28 2008 6:40PM
0 0
profile picture
shortdawg
Posts: 1359 - Karma: 19
I'm about the same height as you and wouldn't venture past 179, although i do mostly park. If you're charging lines then 189s could be an option, but you'll die in the glades and things will feel really weird for a while considering you've skied on short skis all your life. K2 runs a bit longer than they say they do, so 179s would be better in my opinion...
Jul 28 2008 7:43PM
0 0
profile picture
skiRay
Posts: 7558 - Karma: 926
189 no doubt.
Jul 28 2008 7:49PM
0 0
profile picture
Jmanski
Posts: 1152 - Karma: 13
189.

at your high 179 would be rediculous
Jul 29 2008 12:25AM
0 0
profile picture
JordanClarke
Posts: 998 - Karma: 1,922
Only problem with the 189's is that i do ALOT of Glade skiing. I would say about 40-60% of my time is in the glades. Ive been told that longer ski's are really hard in the trees and always clip. Do you think that this is going to be a problem? or will i get use to it..
Jul 29 2008 8:10PM
0 0
profile picture
mmckechnie
Posts: 1483 - Karma: 29
189 for sure
Jul 29 2008 10:04PM
0 0
profile picture
EClay46
Posts: 2499 - Karma: 69
dont worry man, go with the 189, and if your going to be doing a lot of glades, just mount them a little further forward, its rockered so it should be cool, and this will also help with skiing switch in pow
Jul 29 2008 11:28PM
0 0
profile picture
Ski.Ballet
Posts: 2860 - Karma: 200
skiing in the trees shouldnt be a problem on the 189. i use 183's in tight trees all the time
Jul 30 2008 12:37AM
0 0
profile picture
JordanClarke
Posts: 998 - Karma: 1,922
Anymore advice? I NEED to be able to ski glades cause i do that all the time, and also spin off drops and stuff cause i do that to. But i want something that i can still charge and have stababilty, ideally i would go 185 but i am pretty decided on the obsethed so i am thinking 89, bindings at 4/5
Aug 13 2008 9:20PM
0 0
All times are Eastern (-4)